UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended
OR
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _____ to _____ |
Commission File Number
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES ☐ NO ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
|
☒ |
|
Accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the shares of common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 28, 2019 was $
The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 4, 2020 was
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Page |
PART I |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
5 |
|
Item 1A. |
|
|
15 |
|
Item 1B. |
|
|
24 |
|
Item 2. |
|
|
25 |
|
Item 3. |
|
|
27 |
|
Item 4. |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II |
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
|
32 |
|
Item 6. |
|
|
34 |
|
Item 7. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
35 |
Item 7A. |
|
|
64 |
|
Item 8. |
|
|
66 |
|
Item 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
131 |
Item 9A. |
|
|
131 |
|
Item 9B. |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III |
|
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
|
133 |
|
Item 11. |
|
|
133 |
|
Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
133 |
Item 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
134 |
Item 14. |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV |
|
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
|
135 |
|
Item 16. |
|
|
142 |
ii
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements as defined under U.S. federal securities law. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical statements of fact and those regarding our intent, belief or expectations, including, but not limited to, statements regarding: our expectations regarding the settlement we have announced with Windstream Holdings, Inc. (“Windstream Holdings”) and its subsidiaries (Windstream Holdings, together with its subsidiaries, “Windstream”) and our ability to obtain court approval for such settlement and satisfy the conditions precedent to its effectiveness, and Windstream’s ability to implement a successful plan of reorganization and emerge from bankruptcy; if the settlement is not effected, the bankruptcy and Windstream’s performance under its long-term exclusive triple-net lease with us (the “Master Lease”); if the settlement is not effected, our expectations with respect to the treatment of the Master Lease in Windstream’s petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, including with respect to Windstream’s claims that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing transaction, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and that rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease constituted constructive fraudulent transfers and that we are in breach of certain of our obligations under the Master Lease; our expectations regarding the effect of substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern; our expectations about our ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”); our expectations regarding the future growth and demand of the telecommunication industry, future financing plans, business strategies, growth prospects, operating and financial performance, and our future liquidity needs and access to capital; expectations regarding the impact and integration of Information Transport Solutions, Inc. (“ITS”) and M2 Connections, including expectations regarding operational synergies with Uniti Towers and Uniti Fiber; expectations regarding the probability of our obligation to pay contingent consideration upon Tower Cloud, Inc.'s ("Tower Cloud") achievement of certain defined operational and financial milestones; expectations regarding future deployment of fiber strand miles and small cell networks and recognition of revenue related thereto; expectations regarding levels of capital expenditures; expectations regarding the deductibility of goodwill for tax purposes; expectations regarding reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives to interest expense; expectations regarding the amortization of intangible assets; expectations regarding the impact of the operating company-property company partnership with Macquarie Infrastructure Partners (“MIP”) and related acquisition of Bluebird Network, LLC (“Bluebird”); our expectations regarding the wind down of the Consumer CLEC business; and expectations regarding the payment of dividends.
Words such as "anticipate(s)," "expect(s)," "intend(s)," "plan(s)," "believe(s)," "may," "will," "would," "could," "should," "seek(s)" and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could lead to actual results differing materially from those projected, forecasted or expected. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects or which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to:
|
• |
the future prospects of our largest customer, Windstream Holdings, which, following a finding that it is in default of certain of its debt, on February 25, 2019, and along with all of its subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code; |
|
• |
our ability to continue as a going concern if our settlement is not implemented and/or Windstream is not able to successfully emerge and the settlement is not implemented, and Windstream Holdings were to succeed in its recharacterization and fraudulent transfer claims against us, reject the Master Lease or be unable or unwilling to perform its obligations under the Master Lease; |
|
• |
the ability and willingness of our customers to meet and/or perform their obligations under any contractual arrangements entered into with us, including master lease arrangements; |
|
• |
the ability of our customers to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of the assets we lease to them; |
3
|
• |
the ability and willingness of our customers to renew their leases with us upon their expiration, and the ability to reposition our properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we replace an existing tenant; |
|
• |
our ability to renew, extend or retain our contracts or to obtain new contracts with significant customers (including customers of the businesses that we acquire); |
|
• |
the availability of and our ability to identify suitable acquisition opportunities and our ability to acquire and lease the respective properties on favorable terms or operate and integrate the acquired businesses; |
|
• |
our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness and fund our capital funding commitments; |
|
• |
our ability to access debt and equity capital markets; |
|
• |
adverse impacts of changes to our business, economic trends or key assumptions regarding our estimates of fair value, including potential impacts of recent developments surrounding Windstream that could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant impact to our reported earnings; |
|
• |
the impact on our business or the business of our customers as a result of credit rating downgrades, and fluctuating interest rates; |
|
• |
adverse impacts of litigation or disputes involving us or our customers; |
|
• |
our ability to retain our key management personnel; |
|
• |
our ability to maintain our status as a REIT, including as a result of the effects of the recent events with respect to our largest customer, Windstream Holdings; |
|
• |
changes in the U.S. tax law and other federal, state or local laws, whether or not specific to REITs, including the impact of the 2017 U.S. tax reform legislation; |
|
• |
covenants in our debt agreements that may limit our operational flexibility; |
|
• |
the possibility that we may experience equipment failures, natural disasters, cyber attacks or terrorist attacks for which our insurance may not provide adequate coverage; |
|
• |
the risk that we fail to fully realize the potential benefits of or have difficulty in integrating the companies we acquire; |
|
• |
other risks inherent in the communications industry and in the ownership of communications distribution systems, including potential liability relating to environmental matters and illiquidity of real estate investments; and |
|
• |
additional factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). |
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. Except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations, we expressly disclaim any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
4
PART I
Item 1. Business.
The Company
Uniti Group Inc. (the “Company”, “Uniti”, “we”, “us” or “our”) was incorporated in the state of Maryland on September 4, 2014. Uniti is an independent, internally managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) engaged in the acquisition and construction of mission critical infrastructure in the communications industry. We are principally focused on acquiring and constructing fiber optic broadband networks, wireless communications towers, copper and coaxial broadband networks and data centers.
On April 24, 2015, we were separated and spun-off (the “Spin-Off”) from Windstream Holdings, Inc. (“Windstream Holdings” and together with its subsidiaries, “Windstream”) pursuant to which Windstream contributed certain telecommunications network assets, including fiber and copper networks and other real estate (the “Distribution Systems”) and a small consumer competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) business (the “Consumer CLEC Business”) to Uniti and Uniti issued common stock and indebtedness and paid cash obtained from borrowings under Uniti’s senior credit facilities to Windstream. In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into a long-term exclusive triple-net lease (the “Master Lease”) with Windstream, pursuant to which a substantial portion of our real property is leased to Windstream and from which a substantial portion of our leasing revenues are currently derived.
Uniti operates as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, the Company is generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes on income generated by its REIT operations, which includes income derived from the Master Lease. We have elected to treat the subsidiaries through which we operate our fiber business, Uniti Fiber, certain aspects of our towers business, Uniti Towers, and Talk America Services, LLC, which operates the Consumer CLEC Business (“Talk America”), as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). TRSs enable us to engage in activities that result in income that does not constitute qualifying income for a REIT. Our TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
The Company operates through a customary up-REIT structure, pursuant to which we hold substantially all of our assets through a partnership, Uniti Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), that we control as general partner. This structure is intended to facilitate future acquisition opportunities by providing the Company with the ability to use common units of the Operating Partnership as a tax-efficient acquisition currency. As of December 31, 2019, we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and own approximately 98.2% of the partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we had revenues of $1,058 million, net income attributable to common shareholders of $8.4 million, Funds From Operations (“FFO”) of $300.9 million and Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”) of $412.5 million. Both FFO and AFFO are non-GAAP financial measures, which we use to analyze our results. Refer to Part II, Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this Annual Report for additional information regarding these non-GAAP measures. As of December 31, 2019, we managed our operations in four reportable business segments, which are described in more detail in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Recent Developments
Windstream is the lessee of the Distribution Systems pursuant to the Master Lease and, therefore, is presently the source of a substantial portion of our revenues. In recent years, Windstream has experienced annual declines in its total revenue, sales and cash flow, and has had its credit ratings downgraded by nationally recognized credit rating agencies multiple times.
Windstream Bankruptcy Filing
Prior to its bankruptcy filing described below, Windstream was involved in litigation with an entity who acquired certain Windstream debt securities and thereafter issued a notice of default as to such securities relating to the Spin-
5
Off. Windstream challenged the matter in federal court and a trial was held in July 2018. On February 15, 2019, the federal court judge issued a ruling against Windstream, finding that its attempts to waive such default were not valid; that an ‘‘event of default’’ occurred with respect to such debt securities; and that the holder’s acceleration of such debt in December 2017 was effective. In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as a ‘‘debtor in possession’’ under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court.
Windstream Litigation and Settlement
During the first half of 2019, Windstream’s CEO stated that it was evaluating all options as part of the Chapter 11 reorganization process regarding the Master Lease, including renegotiation, recharacterization and rejection of the Master Lease. As further described below under “Legal Proceedings”, on July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services, LLC (‘‘Windstream Services’’) filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in an adversary proceeding against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, that certain rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and that Uniti breached certain of its obligations under the Master Lease.
On March 2, 2020, Uniti and Windstream jointly announced that they have reached an agreement in principle (the “Settlement”) to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement.
Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti and Windstream will agree to mutual releases with respect to any and all liability related to any claims and causes of action between them, including those relating to Windstream’s Chapter 11 proceedings and the Master Lease. Under the Settlement, Uniti will agree to make a $400 million cash payment to Windstream in equal installments over 20 consecutive quarters beginning the first month after Windstream’s emergence at an annual interest rate of 9%, and Uniti may prepay any installments falling due on or after the first anniversary of the Settlement’s effective date (resulting in total payments ranging from $432-$490 million). Uniti will also transfer the proceeds from the sale of its common stock described below to Windstream. In exchange, Windstream will transfer to Uniti certain dark fiber indefeasible rights of use (“IRU”) contracts (that currently generate approximately $21 million in annual operating income before depreciation and amortization) and access rights to 1.8 million fiber strand miles leased by Windstream that is either unutilized or utilized for the dark fiber IRUs being transferred. Uniti will be required to pay Windstream $350 per route mile on any fiber strand miles that are sold above and beyond the fiber strand miles currently being utilized in connection with such dark fiber IRUs. In addition, Uniti will acquire certain Windstream-owned assets, including certain fiber IRU contracts generating $8 million of annual operating income before depreciation and amortization and 0.4 million fiber strand miles covering 4,100 route miles, in exchange for $40.0 million in cash and a 20-year, zero cost IRU for such strands.
Windstream and Uniti will also agree to bifurcate the Master Lease into two structurally similar, but independent, agreements to govern the incumbent local exchange carrier (“ILEC “) and competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) facilities, respectively (collectively, the “New Leases”). Certain copper CLEC assets will be governed under the New Lease relating to the ILEC facilities. The initial aggregate annual rent under the New Leases will be equal to the annual rent under the Master Lease currently in effect. Each of Windstream Services, LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and/or newly formed affiliated entities will become parties to the New Leases. The New Leases will contain cross-guarantees and cross-default provisions, which will remain effective as long as Windstream or an affiliate is a tenant under one of the New Leases. In addition, the New Leases will be amended to require that Windstream maintain certain financial covenants and to permit Uniti to transfer its rights and obligations and otherwise monetize or encumber the New Leases so long as it does not transfer interests to a Windstream competitor.
6
Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti will agree to fund up to an aggregate $1.75 billion in growth capital improvements in long-term fiber and related assets in certain ILEC and CLEC properties (the “Growth Capital Improvements”). Growth Capital Improvements will exclude maintenance or repair expenditures and expenditures toward fiber replacement in excess of $70 million per year and will be subject to Uniti’s approval based on underwriting standards to be included in the New Leases. Annual commitments by Uniti for the Growth Capital Improvements will comprise: $125 million in 2020; $225 million per year in 2021 through 2024; $175 million per year in 2025 and 2026; and $125 million per year in 2027 through 2029. Windstream will be entitled to reimbursement for any cumulative Growth Capital Improvements it incurs in excess of the foregoing annual amounts from the commitment amounts in a subsequent period. On the first anniversary of an installment of funding for a Growth Capital Improvement, the annual base rent payable by Windstream will increase by an amount equal to 8.0% (the “Rent Rate”) of such installment of funding. The Rent Rate will thereafter increase to 100.5% of the prior Rent Rate in subsequent years.
In connection with the Settlement, Uniti also entered into binding letters of intent on March 2, 2020 (each, a “Letter of Intent”) with certain first lien creditors of Windstream, pursuant to which Uniti will sell an aggregate of 38,633,470 shares of Uniti common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Settlement Common Stock”), at $6.33 per share, which represents the closing price of Uniti common stock on the date when an agreement in principle of the basic outline of the Settlement was first reached. Uniti will transfer the proceeds from the sale of the Settlement Common Stock to Windstream as additional settlement consideration. The issuance and sale of the Settlement Common Stock will be made in reliance upon the exemption from registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Certain recipients of the Settlement Common Stock will be subject to a one-year lock up, and all recipients will be subject to a customary standstill agreement. No recipient will receive any governance rights in connection with the issuance.
Finally, on March 2, 2020, Uniti, Windstream and certain of Windstream’s creditors (collectively with Uniti and Windstream, the “Parties”) entered into a Plan Support Agreement (the “Plan Support Agreement”). Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, the Parties agreed to support the Settlement and the approval of a plan of reorganization for Windstream (the “Plan”) on the terms and subject to the conditions described therein. The Plan Support Agreement is terminable by the Parties upon the occurrence of certain specified termination events, including, among other things, (i) the failure to meet certain case milestones, including failure by Windstream to file a motion to approve the Settlement by March 12, 2020 and failure to obtain approval of the Settlement from the bankruptcy court by April 6, 2020, (ii) failure by Windstream to timely appeal any order by the bankruptcy court denying the Settlement or any order overturning an order approving the Settlement on appeal, and (iii) the issuance by a regulatory authority of an order enjoining, or the commencement of an action that could be reasonably expected to enjoin, material portions of the settlement or substantial consummation of the Settlement (subject to a 10 day cure period). The parties to the Plan Support Agreement expect the Plan to become effective, and for Windstream to emerge from bankruptcy, by August 29, 2020.
The Settlement is subject to negotiation and execution of definitive documentation and certain regulatory approvals and conditions precedent, including bankruptcy court approval and Uniti’s receipt of satisfactory “true lease” opinions confirming that the New Leases are “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Business
We are an independent, internally-managed REIT engaged in the acquisition and construction of mission critical infrastructure in the communications industry. We manage our operations in four separate lines of business: Uniti Fiber, Uniti Towers, Uniti Leasing and Talk America.
Refer to Part II, Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview—Significant Business Developments, of this Annual Report for additional information regarding significant developments in our business in 2019.
7
Uniti Fiber
Uniti Fiber is a leading provider of infrastructure solutions, including cell site backhaul and small cell for wireless operators and ethernet, wavelengths and dark fiber for telecommunications carriers and enterprises. With Uniti Fiber, our goal is to capitalize on the rising demand by carriers and enterprises for dark fiber, establish ourselves as a proven small-cell systems provider and leverage wholesale enterprise opportunities as well as opportunities through the School and Libraries Program (commonly referred to as E-Rate) administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company. We believe fiber is the mission-critical focal point in the modern communications infrastructure industry and that Uniti Fiber will accelerate our growth and diversification strategy and expand our relationships with high quality national and international wireless carriers.
At December 31, 2019, Uniti Fiber’s revenues under contract were over $1.2 billion, with a network consisting of 2.0 million strand miles of fiber and approximately 20,900 customer connections. Results for Uniti Fiber are reported in our consolidated financial statements in our Fiber Infrastructure business segment.
Uniti Towers
Uniti Towers’ primary business is constructing and leasing space on communications towers to wireless service providers and other tenants in a number of other industries. Uniti Towers’ leadership has substantial experience in the telecommunications industry and has been overseeing construction and operation of thousands of wireless towers both domestically and abroad for decades. Uniti Towers provides build-to-suit opportunities using customized master lease agreements designed for long-term carrier partnerships.
At December 31, 2019, Uniti Towers’ portfolio consisted of 672 wireless communications towers located in 33 states across the eastern and central regions in the United States. Results for Uniti Towers are reported in our consolidated financial statements in our Towers business segment.
In February 2020, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell 486 of our U.S. towers located across 32 states for total cash consideration of approximately $190.0 million, subject to adjustments. Concurrent with the sale of the U.S. towers, we entered into a strategic “off-take” tower arrangement with a wireless infrastructure partner. Pursuant to the “off-take” arrangement, we will continue to build towers in the U.S. and sell those towers to our partner at an agreed upon price during 2020. We also have the option to extend the “off-take” arrangement to 2021.
The definitive agreement includes a "go-shop" provision, which permits Uniti's Board of Directors and its advisors to solicit alternative proposals from third parties. Uniti will have the right to terminate the agreement to enter into a superior proposal subject to certain terms and conditions.
On April 2, 2019, the Company sold its Uniti Towers’ Latin America business to an entity controlled by Phoenix Towers International (“PTI”) for cash consideration of $101.6 million resulting in a pre-tax gain of $23.8 million. PTI acquired 498 towers located across Mexico, Colombia and Nicaragua.
Uniti Leasing
Uniti Leasing is engaged in acquiring mission-critical communications assets, such as fiber, data centers, next-generation consumer broadband, coaxial and upgradeable copper, and leasing them back to anchor customers on either an exclusive or shared-tenant basis. Presently, a substantial portion of Uniti Leasing’s revenue is rental revenues from leasing the Distribution Systems to Windstream pursuant to the Master Lease. We believe our attractive cost of capital and advantageous REIT structure will enable Uniti Leasing to provide creative and tax-efficient solutions to additional customers, including (i) sale leaseback transactions, whereby Uniti Leasing acquires existing infrastructure assets from communications service providers and leases them back on a long-term basis; (ii) capital investment financing, whereby Uniti Leasing offers communications service providers a cost-efficient method of raising funds for discrete capital investments to upgrade or expand their network; and (iii) mergers and acquisitions financing, whereby Uniti Leasing facilitates mergers and acquisition transactions as a capital partner. Results for Uniti Leasing are reported in our consolidated financial statements in our Leasing business segment.
Consumer CLEC Business
8
We conduct the Consumer CLEC Business through Talk America Services, LLC. Talk America provides local telephone, high-speed Internet and long-distance service to approximately 10,800 customers principally located in 17 states across the eastern and central United States. Substantially all of the network assets used to provide these services to customers are contracted through interconnection agreements with other telecommunications carriers. We have commenced a wind down of our Consumer CLEC Business, which we estimate will be completed during the second quarter of 2020. Results for Talk America are reported in our consolidated financial statements in our Consumer CLEC Business segment.
Industry
The current communications infrastructure industry is marked by the growing demand for and use of bandwidth-intensive devices and applications, such as smart devices, real-time and online streaming video, cloud-based applications, social media and mobile broadband. This growth in consumption requires the support of robust communications infrastructure, of which fiber networks and communications towers are critical components. Substantial investments have been made in recent years in fiber networks, lit services and colocation facilities to keep pace with the increased bandwidth use of both enterprise- and consumer-end users. As companies attempt to keep pace with this rapidly evolving business sector, communications infrastructure continues to increase in priority and economic importance. We believe this considerable demand creates significant opportunities for us as an acquirer and operator and as a funding source for operators seeking to capitalize on these trends through build outs and acquisitions of infrastructure assets.
The wireless communications industry is a prime example of the growing importance of the bandwidth infrastructure industry. As wireless traffic and mobile data consumption continue to grow worldwide, participants in the wireless communications industry are increasing their network capacity through the development of new wireless cell sites and the addition of bandwidth capacity. Consumers are demanding network quality and coverage, and as a result wireless carriers are making significant capital investments to improve quality, expand their coverage and remain relevant in a highly competitive industry. We expect this continued growth in capital expenditures to generate high demands for wireless towers (including strong growth in long-term tower leasing), tower space and bandwidth infrastructure services.
Strategy
Our primary goal is to create long-term stockholder value by (i) generating reliable and growing cash flows, (ii) diversifying our tenant and asset base, (iii) paying a dividend, and (iv) maintaining our financial strength and liquidity. To achieve this goal, we employ a business strategy that leverages our first mover advantages in the sector and our strong access to the capital markets. The key components of our business strategy are:
Acquire Additional Infrastructure Assets Through Sale Leaseback Transactions
We actively seek to acquire communications infrastructure assets from communication service providers and lease these assets back to the communication service providers on a long-term basis. We believe this type of transaction benefits the communication service providers with incremental liquidity which can be used to reduce indebtedness or for other investments, while they continue to focus on their existing business. We will employ a disciplined, opportunistic acquisition strategy and seek to price transactions appropriately based on, among other things, growth opportunities, the mix of assets acquired, length and terms of the lease, and credit worthiness of the tenant.
This strategy also is designed to expand our mix of tenants and other real property and will reduce our revenue concentration with Windstream. We expect that this objective will be achieved over time as part of our overall strategy to acquire new distribution systems and other real property within the communications infrastructure industry to further diversify our overall portfolio.
Capitalize on the Market Demand for Increased Bandwidth Infrastructure and Performance
Bandwidth intensive devices and applications are rapidly fueling worldwide consumption of bandwidth, which in turn fuels a continuously growing demand for stable and secure bandwidth options. Communications service
9
providers and other enterprises whose services and businesses require substantial amounts of bandwidth are increasingly looking to infrastructure providers to support their bandwidth needs and to expand the reach, performance and security of their networks. We believe Uniti Fiber is well positioned to capitalize on this ongoing demand for bandwidth infrastructure solutions.
Fund Capital Extensions to Existing and New Tenants for Improvements of Infrastructure Assets
We believe the communications infrastructure industry in the United States is currently going through an upgrade cycle driven by consumers’ general desire for greater bandwidth and wireless services. These upgrades require significant capital expenditures, and we believe Uniti provides a non-competitive funding source for communication service providers to help accelerate the improvement and expansion of their networks.
We intend to support our tenant operators and other communication service providers by providing capital to them for a variety of purposes, including capacity augmentation projects, tower construction and network expansions. We expect to structure these investments as lease arrangements that produce additional rents.
Facilitate M&A Transactions in the Communication Service Sector as a Capital Partner
We believe Uniti can provide cost efficient funds to potential acquirers in the communication service sector, and thereby facilitate M&A transactions as a capital partner, including by partnering with operators through use of “OpCo-PropCo” structures, pursuant to which we acquire the underlying network and other assets and the operator acquires the operations. The highly fragmented nature of the communication service sector is expected to result in more consolidation, which we believe will provide us ample opportunity to pursue these types of transactions.
Maintain Balance Sheet Strength and Liquidity
We seek to maintain a capital structure that provides the resources and financial flexibility to position us to capitalize on strategic growth opportunities. Our access to, and cost of, external capital is dependent on various factors, including general market conditions, credit ratings on our securities, interest rates and expectations of our future business performance, including as a result of uncertainty with respect to Windstream and the Master Lease. We intend to maintain a strong balance sheet through disciplined use of leverage, aiming to lower our relative cost of capital over time, and continuing to have access to multiple sources of capital and liquidity. As of December 31, 2019, we had $142.8 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. As of February 10, 2020, with the exception of our revolving credit facility, all of our debt is fixed-rate debt.
Competition
We compete for investments in the communications industry with telecommunications companies, investment companies, private equity funds, hedge fund investors, sovereign funds and other REITs who focus primarily on specific segments of the communications infrastructure industry. The communications infrastructure industry is characterized by a high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including many local, regional and global corporations. Some of our competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we have. In addition, revenues from our network properties are dependent, to an extent, on the ability of our operating partners, like Windstream, to compete with other communication service providers.
However, we believe we are positioned to identify and successfully capitalize on acquisition opportunities that meet our investment objectives and that we have significant competitive advantages that support our leadership position in owning, funding the construction of and leasing communications infrastructure, including:
First-Mover Advantage; Uniquely Positioned to Capitalize on Expansion Opportunities
We are the first REIT primarily focused on the acquisition and construction of mission critical infrastructure in the communications industry. We believe this provides us with a significant first-mover competitive advantage to capitalize on the large and fragmented communications infrastructure industry. Additionally, we believe our
10
position, scale and national reach will help us achieve operational efficiencies and support future growth opportunities.
Large Scale Anchor Tenant
We believe the assets we lease to Windstream under the Master Lease are critical for Windstream to successfully run its business and operations, and that Windstream will need the assets subject to the Master Lease while it undergoes its restructuring as set forth under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Windstream, as our anchor tenant, provides us with a base of rent revenues as an initial platform for us to grow and diversify our portfolio and tenant base.
Windstream provides advanced network communications and technology solutions for businesses across the United States. Windstream also offers broadband, entertainment and security solutions to consumers and small businesses primarily in rural areas. Windstream continues to operate the Distribution Systems, hold the associated regulatory licenses and own and operate other assets, including distribution systems in select states not included in the Spin-Off.
Windstream has a diverse customer base, encompassing enterprise and small business customers, carriers and consumers. The Distribution Systems we lease to Windstream are located in 29 different states across the continental United States. The fiber assets in any one state do not account for more than 20% of the total route miles in our network. We believe this geographic diversification will limit the effect of changes in any one market on our overall performance.
Windstream’s stock is quoted on the OTC Markets under the ticker symbol “WINMQ.” Windstream is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC, which include the requirements to file annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information, but Windstream is not current in its reporting obligations. Windstream’s filings with the SEC can be found at www.sec.gov. Windstream’s filings are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
Strong Relationships with Communication Service Providers
Members of our management team have developed an extensive network of relationships with qualified local, regional and national communication service providers across the United States. This extensive network has been built by our management team through decades of operating experience, involvement in industry trade organizations and the development of banking relationships and investor relations within the communications infrastructure industry. We believe these strong relationships will allow us to effectively source investment opportunities from communication service providers other than Windstream. We intend to work collaboratively with our operating partners in providing expansion capital at attractive rates to help them achieve their growth and business objectives. We will seek to partner with communication service providers who possess local market knowledge, demonstrate hands-on management and have proven track records.
Experienced and Committed Management Team
Our senior management team is comprised of veteran leaders with strong backgrounds in their respective disciplines. Our senior management team has extensive experience managing telecommunications operations, consummating mergers and acquisitions and accessing both debt and equity capital markets to fund growth and maintain a flexible capital structure.
11
Insurance
We maintain, or will require in our leases (including the Master Lease), that our tenants maintain, applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Under the Master Lease, Windstream has the right to self-insure or use a captive provider with respect to its insurance obligations. We believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants are customary for similarly situated companies in the telecommunications industry. However, our tenants may elect not to, or be able to, maintain the required insurance coverages, and the failure by any of them to do so could have a material adverse effect on us. We may not continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our leases, including the Master Lease, and such insurance may not be available at a reasonable cost in the future or fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event. Moreover, we cannot guarantee the future financial viability of the insurers.
Employees
At December 31, 2019, we had 899 full-time employees. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
Significant Customers
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 65.0%, 68.2% and 74.8% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from leasing our Distribution Systems to Windstream Holdings pursuant to the Master Lease.
On February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. For a discussion of the impact that Windstream’s bankruptcy may have on the Master Lease, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement
U.S. Telecommunications Regulatory Overview
Market Overview
Our subsidiaries and our tenants operate in a regulated market. As operators of telecommunications facilities and services, both we and the current and future tenants of our telecommunications assets are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local telecommunications laws and regulations. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulates the provision of interstate and international telecommunications services, and state public utility commissions (“PUCs”) regulate intrastate telecommunications services. Federal and state telecommunications laws and regulations are wide-ranging, and violations of them can subject us and our tenants to civil, criminal and administrative sanctions. We expect that the telecommunications industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation. Changes in laws and regulations and violations of federal or state laws or regulations by us or our tenants could have a significant direct or indirect effect on our operations and financial condition, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”
Our operations require that certain of our subsidiaries across all segments hold licenses or other forms of authorization from the FCC and state PUCs in those states where we operate, and in some jurisdictions our subsidiaries must file tariffs or other price lists describing their rates, terms and conditions of the services they provide. The FCC and PUCs can modify or terminate a service provider’s license or other authority to provide telecommunications services for failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The FCC and PUCs may also investigate our subsidiaries’ operations and may impose fines or other penalties for violations of the same. In addition, our subsidiaries are required to submit periodic reports to the FCC and PUCs documenting their revenues and other data. Some of this information is used as the basis for the imposition of various regulatory fees and other assessments. In order to engage in certain transactions in some jurisdictions, including changes of control, the encumbrance of certain assets, the issuance of securities, the incurrence of indebtedness, the guarantee of indebtedness of other entities, including subsidiaries of ours, and the transfer of assets, we are required to provide
12
notice and/or obtain prior approval from certain governmental agencies. Failure to obtain such approvals could subject us to fines or other penalties.
Our subsidiaries are subject to a number of federal and state regulations that govern the way we can conduct our business. Such regulations also impose certain operating costs on our businesses. These regulations can include restrictions on pricing flexibility for certain products, minimum service quality standards, service reporting, intercarrier compensation, contributions to universal service, and other obligations. Further, the relaxation of regulatory requirements on our competitors, such as those granting us access to incumbent local exchange carrier facilities and/or services or the prices that such carriers may charge for such services or access to their facilities, may also have a detrimental effect on the businesses of our subsidiaries and/or tenants.
We have sought to structure the operations for our core real estate business in a manner to minimize the likelihood that we may be required to become regulated as a public utility or common carrier by the FCC or PUCs, but a number of our business operations are nonetheless subject to federal, state, and local regulation, and we cannot guarantee that our core real estate business will not become further subject to federal, state, and local regulation in the future.
With respect to the broadband Internet services that we provide, traditionally, the FCC has recognized that broadband Internet access services are “information services” subject to limited regulation. In 2015, the FCC issued a “network neutrality” decision that declared broadband Internet access services to be subject to certain “telecommunications services” regulation under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. These regulations would have limited the ways that broadband Internet access service providers could structure business arrangements and manage their networks and spurred additional restrictions, including rate regulation, which could adversely affect broadband investment and innovation. In 2017, the FCC voted to return broadband Internet access service to its prior classification as “information services.” As a result of these decisions, state legislators and governors have introduced, and in some cases passed, state laws and executive orders requiring different levels of adherence to “network neutrality” principles for broadband Internet access service providers active in the applicable states. As a result of these laws and regulations, it is unclear at this time how broadband services will be regulated in the future, and the potential impact those regulations may have on our broadband Internet service business.
Consumer CLEC Business
Talk America operates the Consumer CLEC Business as a reseller of telecommunication services pursuant to a Wholesale Master Services Agreement and a Master Service Agreement with Windstream. Talk America was informed by Windstream on April 23, 2019 that Windstream intended to cancel that Wholesale Master Services Agreement. Since that time, Talk America has undertaken efforts to wind down the Consumer CLEC Business operations. This has required Talk America to seek various approvals from the FCC and PUCs in order to transfer or cancel affected customer accounts. Failure to obtain requisite approvals and follow the directives issued by the FCC or PUCs with respect to these matters could subject Talk America to fines or other penalties.
Uniti Towers
Uniti Towers is subject to federal, state and local regulatory requirements with respect to the registration, siting, construction, lighting, marking and maintenance of our towers. In the United States, the construction of new towers or modifications to existing towers may require pre-approval by the FCC and the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), depending on factors such as tower height and proximity to public airfields. Towers requiring pre-approval must be registered with the FCC and maintained in accordance with FCC and FAA standards. Non-compliance with applicable tower-related requirements may lead to monetary penalties or site deconstruction orders.
Uniti Towers is subject to zoning restrictions and restrictive covenants imposed by local authorities or community organizations. While these regulations vary, they typically require approval from local authorities or community standards organizations prior to tower construction or the addition of a new antenna to an existing tower. Opposition by local zoning authorities and community residents can delay or prevent new tower construction or site upgrade projects, thereby increasing the costs and timing of new tower construction and modifications or site upgrades.
13
The failure to properly maintain towers pursuant to applicable regulatory requirements, such as but not limited to, lighting, painting, and other safety standards, can subject us to significant enforcement actions, including monetary penalties both within the United States and abroad.
Uniti Fiber
Our subsidiaries that compose Uniti Fiber own and operate significant fiber and other communications backhaul facilities throughout various regions of the United States. The provision of such services is subject to FCC and PUC licensure in many jurisdictions, and the companies are typically licensed as CLECs and/or interexchange carriers in those states where they operate. The companies also hold various FCC wireless licenses in order to provide microwave backhaul services. Because of the nature of the licenses that these companies hold, and the nature of the services that they provide, they are subject to various federal and state regulatory requirements, including, but not limited to, revenue and other reporting requirements and tariffing requirements. The companies must also maintain their wireless licenses with the FCC, which requires construction and notification reporting and other regulatory requirements. New fiber network construction is also subject to certain state and local governmental permitting and licensing requirements. Delays in the local and state permitting process can delay the construction of new facilities. Failure to abide by permit requirements can subject the company to fines and other penalties.
In some cases, our subsidiaries that compose Uniti Fiber utilize services or facilities of incumbent local exchange carriers through arrangements established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and FCC regulations. The FCC has deregulated some of those requirements that incumbent local exchange carriers offer unbundled network elements, and continues to consider whether to further deregulate access to those facilities and services. We cannot predict how the FCC will resolve those matters, nor whether such network elements will continue to be available in the future at the rates they are available today.
Regulatory Changes
Future revenues, costs and capital investment in the communication businesses of our tenants, Uniti Fiber, Uniti Towers, and other related entities could be adversely affected by material changes to, or decisions regarding applicability of, government requirements, including, but not limited to, changes in rules governing inter-carrier compensation, interconnection access to network facilities, state and federal universal service fund (“USF”) support, rules governing the prices that can be charged for business data services, infrastructure location and siting rules, access to unbundled network elements, and other requirements. Federal and state communications laws and regulations may be amended in the future, and other new laws and regulations may affect our business. In addition, certain laws and regulations applicable to us and our competitors may be, and have been, challenged in the courts and could be vacated or modified at any time. We cannot predict future developments or changes to the regulatory environment or the impact such developments or changes would have on our business.
In addition, regulations could create significant compliance costs for us. Delays in obtaining FCC and PUC certifications and regulatory approvals could cause us to incur substantial legal and administrative expenses, and conditions imposed in connection with such approvals could adversely affect the rates that we are able to charge our customers. Both our subsidiaries and our tenants may also be affected by legislation and/or regulation imposing new or additional obligations related to, for example, law enforcement assistance, cyber-security protection, intellectual property rights protections, environmental protections, consumer privacy, tax, or other areas. We cannot predict how any such future changes may impact our business, or the business of our tenants.
Environmental Matters
A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect telecommunications operations and facilities. These laws and regulations, and their enforcement, involve complex and varied requirements, and many such laws and regulations impose strict liability for violations. Some of these federal, state and local laws may directly impact us. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property, such as us, may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries
14
to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal property damages and the owner’s liability therefore could exceed or impair the value of the property and/or the assets of the owner. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral, which, in turn, could reduce revenues.
Available Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 10802 Executive Center Drive, Benton Building Suite 300, Little Rock, AR 72211 and our telephone number is (501) 850-0820. We maintain a website at www.uniti.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC. Our Exchange Act filings can also be found at www.sec.gov.
Current copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics & Whistleblower Policy, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for our Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees are posted in the Corporate Governance section of the About Us page of our website at www.uniti.com.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Risks Related to Our Business
While we have announced a settlement with Windstream, the settlement is subject to court approval and other conditions and may not be implemented.
As disclosed under Item 1. Business, we have recently announced a settlement with Windstream pursuant to which it would release all claims against us and assume the Master Lease. However, the settlement is subject to numerous conditions, including court approval, regulatory approval and negotiation of definitive documentation, as well as our receipt of opinions of tax counsel regarding the qualification of the resulting master leases as “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and our continued qualification as a REIT. We cannot assure you that these conditions will be satisfied. If the conditions are not satisfied, the litigation will remain pending, and we will continue to be exposed to the risks set forth below.
Even if the settlement is approved and effectuated, we continue to be dependent upon Windstream and its successful emergence from bankruptcy, which is subject to numerous conditions including approval by the court and required creditors of a plan of reorganization. We cannot assure you that Windstream will successfully emerge from bankruptcy.
If the settlement is implemented, we will be required to raise significant additional capital and issue additional equity.
If the settlement with Windstream is approved and implemented, we will be required to issue an aggregate of 38,633,470 shares, equal to 19.99% of our currently outstanding common stock, to certain investors at a purchase price of $6.33 per share. While certain of these investors will enter into lockup agreements with us, the lockup agreements will contain exceptions and these investors will be able to resell these shares into the market over time, which could lead to lower prices for our shares. In addition, we will also be required to raise capital to fund obligations to Windstream, including (i) $490 million of settlement payments payable over time and (ii) an aggregate of $1.75 billion of Growth Capital Investments in property subject to the master lease (although such investments will lead to higher rent payments). We will closely monitor capital markets and will seek to access them promptly when we determine market conditions are appropriate. The amount, nature and timing of any capital markets transactions will depend on: our operating performance and other circumstances; any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements; and overall market conditions. If we are unable to access the capital markets as we anticipate (including because our cost of capital is higher than the returns we will get on our investment in Windstream), we would be subject to a shortfall in liquidity in the future which could lead to a reduction in our
15
capital expenditures and/or dividends and, in an extreme case, our ability to pay our debt service obligations. If this shortfall occurs rapidly and with little or no notice, it could limit our ability to address the shortfall on a timely basis.
We are dependent on Windstream Holdings to make payments to us under the Master Lease, and an event that materially and adversely affects Windstream’s business, financial position or results of operations, including as a result of its recent petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.
Windstream is the lessee of the Distribution Systems pursuant to the Master Lease and, therefore, is presently the source of a substantial portion of our revenues. There can be no assurance that Windstream will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy its payment and other obligations under the Master Lease. In recent years, Windstream has experienced annual declines in its total revenue, sales and cash flow. Prior to its bankruptcy filing, Windstream was involved in litigation with an entity who acquired certain Windstream debt securities and thereafter issued a notice of default as to such securities relating to the Spin-Off. Windstream challenged the matter in federal court and a trial was held in July 2018. On February 15, 2019, the federal court judge issued a ruling against Windstream, finding that its attempts to waive such default were not valid; that an “event of default” occurred with respect to such debt securities; and that the holder’s acceleration of such debt in December 2017 was effective. In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as “debtor in possession” under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court.
If our settlement with Windstream is not effectuated, then Windstream will have the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. Because the Master Lease is a single indivisible Master Lease with a single rent payment, it must be assumed or rejected in whole and cannot be sub-divided by facility or market. A significant amount of Windstream’s revenue is generated from the use of our network included in the Master Lease, and we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations. A rejection of the Master Lease, or even a temporary disruption in payments to us, would require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties and avoid the imposition of liens on our properties and could impact our ability to fund other cash obligations, including dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, non-essential capital expenditures and our debt service obligations, and otherwise affect our ability to maintain REIT status.
In the event of a rejection of the Master Lease, we cannot assure you that we will be able to locate a suitable replacement tenant or if we are successful in locating a replacement tenant, that the rental payments from the new tenant would not be significantly less than the existing rental payments. In addition, a rejection of the Master Lease by Windstream could result in an “event of default” under our our credit agreement by and among the Operating Partnership, CSL Capital, LLC and Uniti Group Finance Inc., the guarantors and lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Credit Agreement”) if we are unable to enter into a replacement lease that satisfies certain criteria set forth in the Credit Agreement within ninety (90) calendar days and we do not maintain pro forma compliance with a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of 5.00 to 1.00. An acceleration of debt under our senior secured credit facilities due to an uncured “event of default” under our Credit Agreement would also result in an “event of default” under the terms of our outstanding notes. Such an “event of default” would give the holders of the applicable debt obligation the right to accelerate our repayment obligations relating to such debt, which would materially and adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and in its opinion on our December 31, 2019 financial statements, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, expressed substantial doubt as to whether we could continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued as a result of Windstream’s bankruptcy petition, the bankruptcy’s uncertain effects on the Master Lease, and uncertainties surrounding the satisfaction of conditions required for our settlement with Windstream to be effectuated. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. While the outcome is uncertain, we expect Windstream will continue to perform on the
16
Master Lease and believe the probability of Windstream rejecting the lease in bankruptcy to be remote because the Master Lease is central to Windstream’s operations. We intend to continue our reduced capital expenditures and dividend and may seek external funding in order to sustain our operations until such time as the settlement is approved. If we do not succeed in raising such funds and reducing such expenditures and if Windstream elects to reject the Master Lease, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business and our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in us. In addition, a failure to provide 2019 audited financial statements without a going concern opinion to the lenders under our Credit Agreement by March 30, 2020 would constitute a breach of the covenants of our Credit Agreement and, unless such default is waived by our lenders, would constitute an immediate event of default. If an event of default were to occur under our Credit Agreement, the Credit Agreement’s administrative agent could declare all outstanding loans immediately due and payable. Such an acceleration would trigger cross-default provisions within the indentures governing our senior notes and thereby entitle the trustee and noteholders to accelerate the repayment of the senior notes.
On February 10, 2020, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2019 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the sixth amendment (the “Sixth Amendment”) to our Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment limits the ability of our non-guarantor subsidiaries to incur indebtedness and increased the interest rate on our revolving facility by 100 bps for each applicable rate. As amended, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.25% or a eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 4.75% to 5.25%, in each case, calculated in a customary manner and determined based on our consolidated secured leverage ratio. These restrictions are in addition to the restrictions set forth in the fourth amendment to our Credit Agreement, which generally limits our ability under the Credit Agreement to (i) prepay unsecured indebtedness and (ii) pay cash dividends in excess of 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. —Significant Business Developments—Amendments to Credit Agreement.”
If the Spin-Off, together with certain related transactions, fails to qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, both we and Windstream could be subject to significant tax liabilities and, in certain circumstances, we could be required to indemnify Windstream for material taxes pursuant to indemnification obligations under the tax matters agreement entered into in connection with the Spin-Off.
Windstream received a private letter ruling (the “IRS Ruling”) from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) to the effect that, on the basis of certain facts presented and representations and assumptions set forth in the request submitted to the IRS, the Spin-Off will qualify as tax-free under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Although a private letter ruling from the IRS generally is binding on the IRS, if the factual representations and assumptions made in the letter ruling request are untrue or incomplete in any material respect, then Windstream will not be able to rely on the IRS Ruling. In addition, the IRS Ruling does not address certain requirements for tax-free treatment of the Spin-Off under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and Windstream’s use of Uniti indebtedness and common stock to retire certain of Windstream’s indebtedness (the “debt exchanges”). Accordingly, the Spin-Off was conditioned upon the receipt by Windstream of a tax opinion from its counsel with respect to the requirements on which the IRS did not rule, which concluded that such requirements also should be satisfied. The tax opinion was based on, among other things, the IRS Ruling, then current law and certain representations and assumptions as to factual matters made by Windstream and us. Any change in currently applicable law, which may or may not be retroactive, or the failure of any factual representation or assumption to be true, correct and complete in all material respects, could adversely affect the conclusions reached in the tax opinion. In addition, the tax opinion is not binding on the IRS or the courts, and the IRS or the courts may not agree with the tax opinion.
If the Spin-Off were determined to be taxable, Windstream would recognize taxable gain. Under the terms of the tax matters agreement entered into with Windstream in connection with the Spin-Off (the “Tax Matters Agreement”), we are generally responsible for any taxes imposed on Windstream that arise from the failure of the Spin-Off and the debt exchanges to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, within the meaning of Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, as applicable, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to certain actions, events or transactions relating to our stock, indebtedness, assets or business, or a breach of the relevant representations or any covenants made by us in the Tax Matters Agreement, the materials submitted to the IRS in
17
connection with the request for the IRS Ruling or the representations provided in connection with the tax opinion. Our indemnification obligations to Windstream are not limited by any maximum amount and such amounts could be substantial. If we are required to indemnify Windstream under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement, we may also be subject to substantial tax liabilities.
In addition, if the Spin-Off or the debt exchanges failed to qualify as tax free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Windstream may incur significant tax liabilities that could materially affect Windstream’s ability to make payments under the Master Lease.
Our level of indebtedness could materially and adversely affect our financial position, including reducing funds available for other business purposes and reducing our operational flexibility.
As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding long term indebtedness of approximately $4.6 billion consisting of a combination of senior notes and revolving and term loans. Additionally, we have a revolving credit facility provided by a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions, which, as of December 31, 2019, had an aggregate principal amount of up to approximately $575.0 million, substantially all of which was drawn. Subject to the restrictions set forth in our debt agreements, our board of directors may establish and change our leverage policy at any time without stockholder approval. Any significant additional indebtedness could require a substantial portion of our cash flow to make interest and principal payments due on our indebtedness. Greater demands on our cash resources may reduce funds available to us to pay dividends, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, or carry out other aspects of our business strategy. Increased indebtedness can also limit our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions, make us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions and create competitive disadvantages for us compared to other companies with relatively lower debt levels. Increased future debt service obligations may limit our operational flexibility, including our ability to acquire assets, finance or refinance our assets or sell assets as needed, and our ability to pay dividends. Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreement” for information about the terms of the limited waiver we received from the lenders to our Credit Agreement.
In February 2020, the Operating Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries issued $2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior secured notes due 2025 and used the proceeds from the offering to repay all $2.05 billion of outstanding term loans under our senior secured credit facilities and to repay approximately $156.7 million of revolving loans (and terminated related commitments of approximately $157.6 million).
We anticipate that we will have sufficient access to liquidity to fund our cash needs; if we are unable to do so, we would need to reduce our spending and it could have an adverse effect on us.
We anticipate continuing to invest in our network infrastructure across our Uniti Leasing, Uniti Fiber and Uniti Towers portfolios. We anticipate declaring dividends for the 2020 tax year to comply with our REIT distribution requirements. We also will need to raise capital to finance our settlement, which includes growth capital investments, with Windstream, if implemented. We anticipate that we will partially finance these needs, together with operating expenses (including our debt service obligations) from our cash on hand, cash flows provided by operating activities, together with funds anticipated from announced divestures. However, we may need to access the capital markets to generate additional funds in an amount sufficient to fund our business operations, announced investment activities, capital expenditures, debt service and distributions to our shareholders. We are closely monitoring the equity and debt markets and will seek to access them promptly when we determine market conditions are appropriate. The amount, nature and timing of any capital markets transactions will depend on: our operating performance and other circumstances; our then-current commitments and obligations; the amount, nature and timing of our capital requirements; any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements; and overall market conditions. These expectations are forward-looking and subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions. If our expectations about our liquidity prove to be incorrect or we are unable to access the capital markets as we anticipate, we would be subject to a shortfall in liquidity in the future which could lead to a reduction in our capital expenditures and/or dividends and, in an extreme case, our ability to pay our debt service obligations. If this shortfall occurs rapidly and with little or no notice, it could limit our ability to address the shortfall on a timely basis.
In light of recent developments and uncertainty surrounding Windstream, if the settlement is not approved or Windstream does not emerge from bankruptcy, we may take further measures to conserve cash as we anticipate that
18
it may be difficult for us to access the capital markets at attractive rates until such uncertainty is clarified. Accordingly, we may elect to suspend, delay or reduce success-based capital expenditures and dividend payments to conserve cash and if necessary, we may pay one or more dividends that are required to maintain or REIT status in shares to the extent allowed under IRS REIT rules. If our assumptions are incorrect, we could need additional sources of liquidity to fund our cash needs and cannot assure that we will obtain them.
We intend to pursue acquisitions of additional properties and seek other strategic opportunities, which may result in the use of a significant amount of management resources or significant costs, and we may not fully realize the potential benefits of such transactions.
We intend to pursue acquisitions of additional properties and seek acquisitions and other strategic opportunities. Accordingly, we currently are, and expect in the future to be, engaged in evaluating potential transactions and other strategic alternatives. Although there is uncertainty that any of these discussions will result in definitive agreements or the completion of any transaction, we may devote a significant amount of our management resources to such a transaction, which could negatively impact our operations. We may incur significant costs in connection with seeking acquisitions or other strategic opportunities regardless of whether the transaction is completed. In the event that we consummate an acquisition or strategic alternative in the future, there is no assurance that we would fully realize the potential benefits of such a transaction. Integration may be difficult and unpredictable, and acquisition-related integration costs, including certain non-recurring charges, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. Moreover, integrating assets and businesses may significantly burden management and internal resources, including the potential loss or unavailability of key personnel. If we fail to successfully integrate the assets and businesses we acquire, we may not fully realize the potential benefits we expect, and our operating results could be adversely affected.
In light of recent developments and uncertainty surrounding Windstream, we may curtail our acquisition activities during the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy in an effort to conserve cash.
We are dependent on the communications industry and may be susceptible to the risks associated with it, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.
As the owner, lessor and provider of communications services and distribution systems serving the communications industry, we are impacted by the risks associated with the communications industry. Therefore, our success is to some degree dependent on the communications industry, which could be adversely affected by economic conditions in general, changes in consumer trends and preferences, changes in communications technology designed to enhance the efficiency of communications distribution systems (including lit fiber networks and wireless equipment), and other factors over which we and our tenants have no control. As we are subject to risks inherent in substantial investments in a single industry, a decrease in the communications business or development and implementation of any such new technologies would likely have an adverse effect on our revenues.
Our business is subject to government regulations and changes in current or future laws or regulations could restrict our ability to operate our business in the manner currently contemplated.
Our business, and that of our tenants, is subject to federal, state and local regulation. In certain jurisdictions these regulations could be applied or enforced retroactively. Local zoning authorities and community organizations are often opposed to construction in their communities and these regulations can delay, prevent or increase the cost of new distribution system construction and modifications, thereby limiting our ability to respond to customer demands and requirements. Existing regulatory policies may materially and adversely affect the associated timing or cost of such projects and additional regulations may be adopted which increase delays or result in additional costs to us, or that prevent such projects in certain locations. These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. For more information regarding the regulations we are subject to, please see the section entitled “Business – Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement.”
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.
19
As further described in Item 9A of this report, in the course of completing our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting of asset acquisitions, specifically around the identification and valuation of the acquired assets. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result, management has concluded that, because of this material weakness, our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019. If we fail to complete the remediation of this material weakness, or after having remediated such material weakness, thereafter fail to maintain the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures, we could be subjected to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation, the defense of any of which could cause the diversion of management’s attention and resources, we could incur significant legal and other expenses, and we could be required to pay damages to settle such actions if any such actions were not resolved in our favor. Continued or future failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could also result in financial statements that do not accurately reflect our financial condition or results of operations. There can be no assurance that we will not conclude in the future that this material weakness continues to exist or that we will not identify any significant deficiencies or other material weaknesses that will impair our ability to report our financial condition and results of operations accurately or on a timely basis.
If we determine that our goodwill has become impaired, we may incur impairment charges, which would negatively impact our operating results.
At December 31, 2019, we had $690.7 million of goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. We assess potential impairment of our goodwill at least annually. Impairment may result from significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets, negative industry or economic trends and/or any changes in key assumptions regarding our fair value. Changes in these events and conditions or other assumptions could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings. For a discussion of our goodwill impairment testing, see “Critical Accounting Policies-Evaluation of Goodwill Impairment” in Part II, Item 7A-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We or our tenants may experience uninsured or underinsured losses, which could result in a significant loss of the capital we have invested in a property, decrease anticipated future revenues or cause us to incur unanticipated expenses.
The Master Lease requires, and we expect that new lease agreements that we enter into will require, that the tenant maintain comprehensive insurance and hazard insurance or self-insure its insurance obligations. However, there are certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and floods that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Insurance coverage may not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of a loss. Inflation, changes in ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it infeasible to use insurance proceeds to replace the property after such property has been damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the insurance proceeds received might not be adequate to restore the economic position with respect to such property.
In addition, even if damage to our properties is covered by insurance, a disruption of business caused by a casualty event may result in loss of revenue for our tenants or us. Any business interruption insurance may not fully compensate them or us for such loss of revenue. If one of our tenants experiences such a loss, it may be unable to satisfy its payment obligations to us under its lease with us.
We rely on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security failure of that technology could harm our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information and to manage or support a variety of our business processes, including financial transactions and maintenance of records. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmitting and storing confidential information. Although we have taken steps to protect
20
the security of the data maintained in our information systems, it is possible that our security measures will not be able to prevent the systems’ improper functioning, or the improper disclosure of information in the event of cyber-attacks. Physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers and similar security breaches, can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Any failure to maintain proper function, security and availability of our information systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties and could materially and adversely affect us.
Any failure of Uniti Fiber’s physical infrastructure or services could lead to significant costs and disruptions.
Uniti Fiber’s business depends on providing customers with highly reliable service. The services provided are subject to failure resulting from numerous factors, including human error, power loss, improper maintenance, physical or electronic security breaches, fire, earthquake, hurricane, flood and other natural disasters, water damage, the effect of war, terrorism and any related conflicts or similar events worldwide, and sabotage and vandalism. Problems within Uniti Fiber’s networks or facilities, whether within our control or the control of third-party providers, could result in service interruptions or equipment damage. We may not be able to efficiently upgrade or change Uniti Fiber’s networks or facilities to meet new demands without incurring significant costs that we may not be able to pass on to customers. Given the service guarantees that may be included in Uniti Fiber’s agreements with customers, such disruptions could result in customer credits; however, we cannot assume that customers will accept these credits as compensation in the future, and we may face additional liability or loss of customers.
Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT
If we do not qualify as a REIT, or fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability, which could reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders and to service debt.
We operate as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain highly technical and complex asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination and for which we may not obtain independent appraisals.
If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and dividends paid to our stockholders would not be deductible by us in computing our taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders, which in turn could have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock and to service debt. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.
In addition, as a result of the limited waiver and amendment to our Credit Agreement and our issuance of 7.875% senior secured notes in February 2020, (discussed in “Risks Related to Our Business”) our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts exceeding 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any capital gains, generally will be restricted. As a result, we may be required to record a provision in our Consolidated Financial Statements for U.S. federal income taxes related to the activities of the REIT and its passthrough subsidiaries for any undistributed income. We are subject to the statutory requirements of the locations in which we conduct business, and state and local income taxes are accrued as deemed required in the best judgment of management based on analysis and interpretation of respective tax laws.
Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on us.
The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”). Changes to the tax laws affecting REITs or TRSs, which may have retroactive application, could adversely affect our stockholders or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our stockholders or us. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that new legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly
21
affect our ability to remain qualified as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, the determination of the amount of REIT taxable income or the amount of tax paid by the TRSs.
We could fail to qualify as a REIT if income we receive from sale-leaseback transactions, such as income from Windstream pursuant to the Master Lease, is not treated as qualifying income.
Under applicable provisions of the Code, we will not be treated as a REIT unless we satisfy various requirements, including requirements relating to the sources of our gross income. Rents received or accrued by us from Windstream or other lessees will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of these requirements if the relevant lease is not respected as a true lease for U.S. federal income tax purposes and is instead treated as a service contract, joint venture or some other type of arrangement. If any of our leases, including the Master Lease, is not respected as a true lease for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may fail to qualify as a REIT.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan, and we could elect to pay dividends substantially in the form of additional shares of our common stock.
We generally must qualify as a REIT and distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, for the U.S. federal corporate income tax not to apply to earnings that we distribute (assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied). To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify for taxation as a REIT but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed net taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified for REITs under U.S. federal income tax laws. We currently intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. However, as indicated in the risk factors above, as a result of recent developments surrounding Windstream, we may suspend, delay or reduce our dividend to conserve cash, and during the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy (discussed in “Risks Related to Our Business”), our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts exceeding 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, generally will be restricted. Accordingly, because we are required to make distributions in certain amounts to our shareholders in order to maintain our REIT status and avoid incurring entity-level income and excise tax, we may elect to pay one or more dividends to our shareholders substantially in the form of additional shares of common stock. If we do so, the common stock that we distribute would be taxable dividend income to our shareholders, in whole or in part, based on the fair market value of our common stock at the time the dividend is paid.
Our FFO is currently generated largely by rents paid under the Master Lease. From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices or distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions in order to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock and decrease cash available to service debt.
Recent developments surrounding Windstream could adversely affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT.
In addition to satisfying the distribution requirement described above in the immediately preceding risk factor, we must satisfy a number of other requirements in order to qualify as a REIT. Recent developments surrounding Windstream, as described in “Risks Related to Our Business”, could adversely affect our ability to satisfy several of these requirements and thus our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT.
For example, in order to qualify as a REIT for any year, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash items, government securities and “real estate assets” (as defined in the
22
Code), and no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities (other than qualified real estate assets) of one or more TRSs. If we fail to comply with either of these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification. Our ability to satisfy these requirements depends in substantial part on the value of the assets that are the subject of the Master Lease with Windstream, and any diminution in the value of such assets, including as a result of any diminution in the implied value of the Master Lease as a result of changes in the financial condition or creditworthiness of Windstream, Windstream’s rejection of the Master Lease in bankruptcy, the recharacterization of the Master Lease as a “financing arrangement” or Windstream’s inability or unwillingness to meet its rent and other obligations under the Master Lease, could adversely affect our ability to satisfy these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to timely correct any such failure or otherwise qualify for any statutory relief provision. See “—Risks Related to Our Business—We are dependent on Windstream Holdings to make payments to us under the Master Lease, and an event that materially and adversely affects Windstream’s business, financial
position or results of operations, including as a result of its recent petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.” In addition, under applicable provisions of the Code, we will not be treated as a REIT for any year unless we satisfy various requirements, including requirements relating to the sources of our gross income in such year. Our ability to satisfy these gross income tests depends in substantial part on our receipt of rents paid under the Master Lease. The rejection by Windstream of the Master Lease, the recharacterization of the Master Lease as a “financing arrangement”, Windstream’s inability or unwillingness to meet its rent and other obligations under the Master Lease, or any suspension, delay or other reduction in the amount of rent that we receive under the Master Lease could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.
Even if we remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. For example, we hold some of our assets and conduct certain of our activities through a TRS that is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate-level income taxes as a regular C corporation. In addition, we may incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with a TRS if they are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. Any of these taxes could decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders and servicing our debt.
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and “real estate assets” (as defined in the Code). The remainder of our investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities (other than qualified real estate assets) of one or more TRSs, and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments (as defined in the Code). If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result of such asset limitations, we may be required to forego otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders and servicing our debt.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We cannot guarantee our ability to pay dividends in the future.
To qualify as a REIT, our annual dividend must not be less than 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. Our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the risk factors herein. Dividends will be
23
authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a number of factors, including actual results of operations, restrictions under Maryland law or applicable debt covenants, our financial condition, our taxable income, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, our operating expenses and other factors our directors deem relevant. We cannot ensure that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash dividends or year-to-year increases in cash dividends in the future. As a result of recent actions related to Windstream, as set forth in “Risks Related to Our Business”, we may choose to reduce or suspend our dividend for a period of time until the situation is clarified. Moreover, during the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy (discussed in “Risks Related to Our Business” and “Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT”), our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts exceeding 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, generally will be restricted. Accordingly, because we are required to make distributions in certain amounts to our shareholders in order to maintain our REIT status and avoid incurring entity-level income and excise tax, we may elect to pay one or more dividends to our shareholders substantially in the form of additional shares of common stock. If we do so, the common stock that we distribute would be taxable dividend income to our shareholders, in whole or in part, based on the fair market value of our common stock at the time the dividend is paid.
Furthermore, while we are required to pay dividends in order to maintain our REIT status (as described above under “Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT—REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan”), we may elect not to maintain our REIT status, in which case we would no longer be required to pay such dividends. Moreover, even if we do maintain our REIT status, after completing various procedural steps, we may elect to comply with the applicable distribution requirements by distributing, under certain circumstances, shares of our common stock in lieu of cash. If we elect not to maintain our REIT status or to satisfy any required distributions in shares of common stock in lieu of cash, such action could negatively affect our business and financial condition as well as the market price of our common stock. No assurance can be given that we will pay any dividends on shares of our common stock in the future.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may fluctuate widely.
We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly since February 15, 2019 and may continue to fluctuate significantly, depending upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including the collateral consequences that have resulted, or could result, from Windstream’s bankruptcy.
Our charter restricts the ownership and transfer of our outstanding stock, which may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or change of control of our company.
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of stock may be owned, beneficially or constructively, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year after the first year for which we elect to be taxed and qualify as a REIT. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year (other than the first taxable year for which we elect to be taxed and qualify as a REIT). Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our board of directors to take such actions as are necessary or advisable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Our charter also provides that, unless exempted by the board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock or more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock. The constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause shares of stock owned directly or constructively by a group of related individuals or entities to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control of us that might involve a premium price for shares of our stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None
24
Item 2. Properties.
Uniti and its subsidiaries own or lease approximately 120,000 fiber network route miles, representing approximately 6.3 million fiber strand miles, approximately 229,500 route miles of copper cable lines, wireless communication towers, central office land and buildings across 42 states and beneficial rights to permits, pole agreements and easements.
Leasing Segment
Uniti Leasing’s network properties include its fiber route miles and copper route miles. Below is a geographic distribution summary as of December 31, 2019:
Location |
|
Fiber Route Miles |
|
|
Copper Route Miles |
|
|
Total Route Miles |
|
|||
GA |
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
54,800 |
|
TX |
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
48,800 |
|
IA |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
31,500 |
|
|
|
39,900 |
|
KY |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
IL |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
MO |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
17,100 |
|
NC |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
AR |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
13,400 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
OH |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
IN |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
WI |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
FL |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
MI |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
CA |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
OK |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
PA |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
TN |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
VA |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
NM |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
WV |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
900 |
|
KS |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
Total |
|
|
84,100 |
|
|
|
229,500 |
|
|
|
313,600 |
|
(1) Includes 12 states. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Fiber Segment
Uniti Fiber’s network properties include its fiber route miles. Below is a geographic distribution summary as of December 31, 2019:
Location |
|
Fiber Route Miles |
|
|
FL |
|
|
6,200 |
|
GA |
|
|
5,800 |
|
LA |
|
|
5,600 |
|
PA |
|
|
4,500 |
|
AL |
|
|
4,000 |
|
MS |
|
|
2,800 |
|
VA |
|
|
1,600 |
|
NY |
|
|
1,500 |
|
TX |
|
|
1,300 |
|
NJ |
|
|
800 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Total |
|
|
35,600 |
|
(1) Includes 5 states. |
|
|
|
|
Towers Segment
Uniti Towers’ network properties include its wireless communication towers. Below is a geographic distribution summary as of December 31, 2019:
Location |
|
Towers |
|
|
LA |
|
|
195 |
|
TX |
|
|
102 |
|
AR |
|
|
54 |
|
IL |
|
|
37 |
|
AL |
|
|
36 |
|
WI |
|
|
31 |
|
MS |
|
|
29 |
|
KY |
|
|
25 |
|
GA |
|
|
20 |
|
MO |
|
|
20 |
|
NM |
|
|
20 |
|
OK |
|
|
18 |
|
TN |
|
|
13 |
|
NE |
|
|
11 |
|
OH |
|
|
11 |
|
MN |
|
|
10 |
|
KS |
|
|
6 |
|
PA |
|
|
6 |
|
SC |
|
|
4 |
|
IN |
|
|
3 |
|
NC |
|
|
3 |
|
NY |
|
|
3 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
15 |
|
Total |
|
|
672 |
|
(1) Includes 11 states. |
|
|
|
|
26
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to claims and administrative proceedings, none of which we believe are material or would be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Windstream Bankruptcy Filing
Prior to its bankruptcy filing described below, Windstream was involved in litigation with an entity who acquired certain Windstream debt securities and thereafter issued a notice of default as to such securities relating to the Spin-Off. Windstream challenged the matter in federal court and a trial was held in July 2018. On February 15, 2019, the federal court judge issued a ruling against Windstream, finding that its attempts to waive such default were not valid; that an “event of default” occurred with respect to such debt securities; and that the holder’s acceleration of such debt in December 2017 was effective. In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as a “debtor in possession” under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court. See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” for additional information concerning the impact Windstream’s bankruptcy may have on our operations and financial conditions.
Windstream Litigation and Settlement
During the first half of 2019, Windstream’s chief executive officer stated that it was evaluating all options as part of the Chapter 11 reorganization process regarding the Master Lease, including renegotiation, recharacterization and rejection of the Master Lease. As further described below, on July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services, LLC (“Windstream Services”) filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in an adversary proceeding against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, that certain rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and that Uniti breached certain of its obligations under the Master Lease.
Rejection. In bankruptcy, Windstream has the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. Because the Master Lease is a single indivisible Master Lease with a single rent payment, it must be assumed or rejected in whole and cannot be sub-divided by facility or market. A significant amount of Windstream’s revenue is generated from the use of our network included in the Master Lease, and we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations. Furthermore, Windstream is designated as a “carrier of last resort” in certain markets where it utilizes the Master Lease to provide service to its customers, and we believe Windstream would require approval from the applicable PUC and the FCC to cease providing service in those markets. As a result, although we can provide no assurances, we believe the probability of Windstream rejecting the Master Lease in bankruptcy to be remote. A rejection of the Master Lease, or even a temporary disruption in payments to us, would require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties and avoid the imposition of liens on our properties and could impact our ability to fund other cash obligations, including dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, non-essential capital expenditures and our debt service obligations and could otherwise affect our ability to maintain REIT status.
A rejection of the Master Lease by Windstream could result in an “event of default” under our Credit Agreement if we are unable to enter into a replacement lease that satisfies certain criteria set forth in the Credit Agreement within ninety (90) calendar days and we do not maintain pro forma compliance with a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of 5.00 to 1.00. An acceleration of debt under our senior secured credit facilities due to an uncured “event of default” under our Credit Agreement would also result in an “event of default” under the terms of our outstanding notes. Such an “event of default” would give the holders of the applicable debt obligation the right to accelerate our repayment obligations relating to such debt.
27
The Master Lease contains no provision that contemplates renegotiation of the lease and the bankruptcy court has no ability to unilaterally reset the rent or terms of the lease. In addition, our Credit Agreement prohibits us from amending the Master Lease in a manner that, among other provisions, pro forma for any such amendment, would result in our consolidated secured leverage ratio exceeding 5.00 to 1.00, and management has no intention to enter into a lease amendment that would violate our debt covenants. However, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring, including as a result of the adversary proceeding brought by Windstream related to the Master Lease if the Settlement is not implemented.
Mediation. Uniti, Windstream and Windstream’s creditors have been engaged in mediation in the Windstream bankruptcy to resolve claims brought by Windstream against Uniti. We have recently announced an agreement in principle to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement. However, the settlement is subject to various conditions and if it does not occur, the litigation described below would be resumed. See “Item 1. Business.—Recent Developments.”
Recharacterization / Pending Master Lease Litigation. On July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging¸ among other things, that (1) the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, (2) rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, (3) the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and (4) Uniti has breached its non-competition obligations to Windstream under the Master Lease, each of which allegations is discussed in more detail below. As described above, the trial for the recharacterization claim has been stayed.
Recharacterization. Windstream asserts that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement. If the Master Lease were recharacterized as a financing arrangement, Windstream has argued that Windstream should be deemed the true owner of the property subject to the Master Lease, and Uniti should be treated as a creditor of Windstream rather than as a landlord. In evaluating a recharacterization claim, the Bankruptcy Court will look to assess, among other things, the “economic realities” of the transaction and may reach conclusions notwithstanding positions previously taken by Windstream or Uniti as to the nature of the Master Lease, whether publicly or otherwise. In assessing claims for recharacterization of a transaction involving a lease, bankruptcy courts have previously considered such factors as (i) whether the lessor retains residual value at the termination of the lease, (ii) whether “rental” payments were calculated to compensate the lessor for the use of the property, or were structured for another purpose, such as providing a specific return on investment, (iii) whether in a sale-leaseback transaction the purchase price charged for the assets related to the fair market value of the assets or a substantially different amount, such as the amount of financing required by the lessee, (iv) whether the property was purchased specifically for the lessee’s use, (v) whether structuring the transaction as a lease conveyed tax advantages for the parties, and (vi) who bears the risk and benefits of ownership, including whether the lessee retains obligations typically associated with ownership, such as responsibility for property taxes and insurance. Because any determination by the Bankruptcy Court will involve complex factual and legal analysis, including with respect to the factors described above, we cannot provide any assurances as to how the Bankruptcy Court may rule on these issues.
Were the Bankruptcy Court to hold that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, it could significantly affect or even eliminate current payments to us under the Master Lease and could significantly affect the ultimate treatment of our claims (including potentially through changing our status to that of a creditor that would share in creditor recoveries from the estate rather than receive rent payments). The Bankruptcy Court could determine that Windstream is the true owner of the property subject to the Master Lease, and we have argued that such property would be deemed to be owned by Windstream Holdings as the counterparty to the Master Lease and that Uniti would have a claim against Windstream Holdings that is secured by such property. Windstream has argued that such property would instead be owned by the operating subsidiaries that previously held it and that our claims would be against Windstream Holdings as the counterparty to the Master Lease. In such an event, the Bankruptcy Court would also determine if our claims are secured by an interest in the leased property. If the Bankruptcy Court were to determine that our claims are not secured by an interest in the leased property, our claims
28
could be unsecured and structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors at Windstream Holdings’ subsidiaries, including Windstream Services. Windstream Services is the issuer of substantially all of Windstream’s debt obligations and certain of its operating subsidiaries guarantee such debt obligations. Were we to be treated as an unsecured creditor of Windstream Holdings, we would not be able to recover any value from Windstream Services or such other operating subsidiaries until all of their respective debt obligations have been satisfied and, in such event, the notes and the guarantees of the notes would only be secured on a first-priority basis by certain of our assets that do not constitute the property subject to the Master Lease. In the event of such an adverse determination, our ability to meet our debt and other obligations could be materially impaired. In addition, recharacterization of the Master Lease as a financing arrangement, depending on the findings of fact and law of, and remedies applied by, the Bankruptcy Court, could affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Master Lease, our status as a REIT (see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT—Recent developments surrounding Windstream could adversely affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT”) and could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
Constructive Fraudulent Transfer. Windstream alleges that rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers. If the constructive fraudulent transfer claim were successful, Uniti may be required to repay Windstream the amount of rent payments made by Windstream above fair market rent as determined by the Bankruptcy Court and the aggregate amount of all tenant capital improvements made by Windstream, in each case since the date on which the Bankruptcy Court found Windstream to have been insolvent. In its complaint in the adversary proceeding, Windstream alleges that it has paid approximately $366 million for tenant capital improvements under the Master Lease from the fourth quarter of 2017 through November 2019, in addition to making substantial rent payments. As any such calculation of fair market rent and any resulting damages would be a fact-intensive inquiry, it is not possible to provide a likely range of damages at this time, but any such damages award could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
Master Lease for Personal Property. Windstream alleges that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property. If the Master Lease were determined to be a lease of personal property, the deadline for Windstream Holdings to assume or reject the Master Lease would be the confirmation of its plan of reorganization by the Bankruptcy Court, which would extend the deadline that would otherwise be applicable under the bankruptcy code if the Master Lease were treated as a lease of real property, and Windstream could seek from the Bankruptcy Court relief from its current performance obligations during the bankruptcy case. In addition, if the Master Lease were determined to be a lease of personal property, this could also impact our status as a REIT if the IRS were to determine that our gross income is not sufficiently derived from real property. See “Risk Factors— Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT—Recent developments surrounding Windstream could adversely affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT.” On January 21, 2020, Windstream agreed to stay, without prejudice, its action seeking a determination that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property.
Breach of Contract. Windstream alleges that Uniti has breached its non-competition obligations to Windstream under the Master Lease and that Windstream is entitled to damages and/or an abatement of rent as a result of such breach, although no damages amount has been asserted. We believe this claim is without merit and in any event do not believe damages would be material.
While the Windstream Master Lease litigation is currently stayed, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring. However, any adverse determination or judicial decision on one or more of the claims against us could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition or, in certain circumstances, cause us to file for voluntary Chapter 11 protection.
In addition, pursuant to the Master Lease, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, any use, misuse, maintenance or repair by Windstream with respect to the Distribution Systems. Windstream is currently a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings, including various claims arising in the ordinary course of its telecommunications business, which are subject to the indemnities provided by Windstream to us. If Windstream assumes the Master Lease, it would be obligated to honor all indemnification claims. If Windstream were to reject the Master Lease, any indemnification claims would be treated as unsecured claims, and, if that were to occur, there can be no assurance we would receive any indemnification payments from Windstream. While these
29
actions and proceedings are not believed to be material, individually or in the aggregate, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted. The resolution of any such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on Windstream’s business, financial position or results of operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations if Windstream is unable to meet its indemnification obligations.
On March 2, 2020, Uniti and Windstream jointly announced that they have reached an agreement in principle to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement. See “Item 1. Business.—Recent Developments.”
Other Litigation
On July 3, 2019, SLF Holdings, LLC (“SLF”) filed a complaint against the Company, Uniti Fiber Holdings Inc. (“Uniti Fiber”), and certain current and former officers of the Company (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, in connection with Uniti Fiber’s purchase of Southern Light, LLC from SLF in July 2017. The complaint asserted claims for fraud and conspiracy, as well as claims under federal and Alabama securities laws, alleging that Defendants improperly failed to disclose to SLF the risk that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. On September 26, 2019, the action was transferred to United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On November 18, 2019, SLF filed an amended complaint, adding allegations that Defendants also failed to fully disclose the risk that the Master Lease purportedly could be recharacterized as a financing instead of “true lease.” The amended complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as reformation of the purchase agreement for the sale. On December 18, 2019, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety. That motion was fully briefed as of February 7, 2020, but no decision has been issued. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations.
On October 25, 2019, Ibrahim E. Safadi filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers alleging violations of federal securities laws (the “Safadi Action”). The putative class action seeks to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and February 15, 2019. The lawsuit asserts violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. The lawsuit seeks class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations.
On December 6, 2019, Phil Queder filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers alleging violations of federal securities laws (the “Queder Action”). The putative class action seeks to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and February 15, 2019. The lawsuit asserts violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. The lawsuit seeks class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations.
30
On December 23, 2019, Michael Avery filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers alleging violations of federal securities laws. The putative class action seeks to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and June 24, 2019 (the “Avery Action”). The lawsuit asserts violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream, which would have certain consequences for the Company’s liquidity. The lawsuit seeks class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. On March 9, 2020, the plaintiff in the Avery Action filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice.
On December 30, 2019, various putative shareholders of the Company filed motions to consolidate the Safadi, Queder, and Avery Actions and to appoint a lead plaintiff and lead counsel in the consolidated action. The Court has not yet ruled on those motions.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
None
31
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “UNIT.”
Holders
As of March 4, 2020, the closing price of our common stock was $10.34 per share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. As of March 4, 2020, we had 193,263,981 outstanding shares of common stock, and there were approximately 21,453 registered holders of record of Uniti’s common stock. A substantially greater number of holders of Uniti common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares of record are held by banks, brokers, and other financial institutions.
Dividends (Distributions)
Distributions with respect to our common stock are characterized for federal income tax purposes as taxable ordinary dividends, capital gains dividends, non-dividend distributions or a combination thereof. It has been our policy to declare dividends to common shareholders so as to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code governing REITs.
Any dividends must be declared by our Board of Directors, which will take into account various factors including our current and anticipated operating results, our financial position, REIT requirements, conditions prevailing in the market, restrictions in our debt documents and additional factors they deem appropriate. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to pay dividends or to change the amount paid as dividends. As a result of recent actions related to Windstream, as set forth in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors”, we may choose to reduce or suspend our dividend for a period of time until the situation is clarified. In addition, during the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy, the Fourth Amendment to our Credit Agreement (as set forth in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors”) and our 7.875% senior secured notes due 2025 generally limit our ability under the Credit Agreement to pay cash dividends in excess of 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains.
Stock Performance
The following graph shows a comparison from April 20, 2015 (the date our common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market) through December 31, 2019 of the cumulative total return for our common stock, the Standard & Poor's 400 Stock Index (S&P 400 Index), and the MSCI US REIT Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested at the market open on April 20, 2015 and that all dividends were reinvested in the common stock of Uniti, the S&P 400 Index and the MSCI US REIT Index. The stock price performance of the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
32
Cumulative Total Stockholder Returns
Based on Investment of $100.00 Beginning on April 20, 2015
|
|
4/20/2015 |
|
|
12/31/2015 |
|
|
12/31/2016 |
|
|
12/31/2017 |
|
|
12/31/2018 |
|
|
12/31/2019 |
|
||||||
Uniti Group Inc. |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
72.33 |
|
|
$ |
107.65 |
|
|
$ |
84.94 |
|
|
$ |
84.93 |
|
|
$ |
46.76 |
|
S&P 400 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
92.56 |
|
|
|
111.76 |
|
|
|
129.90 |
|
|
|
115.50 |
|
|
|
145.77 |
|
MSCI US REIT Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
100.78 |
|
|
|
109.46 |
|
|
|
115.08 |
|
|
|
109.89 |
|
|
|
138.33 |
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below provides information regarding shares withheld from Uniti employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock granted under the Uniti Group Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of common stock withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations may be deemed purchases of such shares required to be disclosed pursuant to this Item 5.
Period |
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
|
Average Price Paid per Share(1) |
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
|
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|
||||
October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019 |
|
|
537 |
|
$ |
7.69 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019 |
|
|
920 |
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
1,457 |
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
33
(1) |
The average price paid per share is the weighted-average of the fair market prices at which we calculated the number of shares withheld to cover tax withholdings for the employees. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table sets forth selected financial data for Uniti on a consolidated and combined historical basis as of the dates and for the years indicated.
Prior to April 24, 2015, we did not operate the Consumer CLEC Business separately from Windstream, nor did we commence our leasing business. The selected historical financial data for the period from January 1, 2015 to April 24, 2015 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Consumer CLEC Business and Distribution Systems.
The following should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements, accompanying notes and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, each of which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
April 24 - December 31, 2015 |
|
|
January 1 - April 24, 2015 |
|
||||||
Statement of Income Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue(1) |
|
$ |
1,057,611 |
|
|
$ |
1,017,634 |
|
|
$ |
916,032 |
|
|
$ |
770,408 |
|
|
$ |
476,314 |
|
|
$ |
10,149 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
390,112 |
|
|
|
319,591 |
|
|
|
305,994 |
|
|
|
275,394 |
|
|
|
181,797 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
8,384 |
|
|
|
7,989 |
|
|
|
(16,552 |
) |
|
|
(5,497 |
) |
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,014,284 |
|
|
$ |
4,592,937 |
|
|
$ |
4,330,082 |
|
|
$ |
3,318,752 |
|
|
$ |
2,542,636 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Notes and other debt, net(2) |
|
|
5,070,673 |
|
|
|
4,901,515 |
|
|
|
4,539,026 |
|
|
|
4,082,749 |
|
|
|
3,505,228 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Convertible preferred stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
86,508 |
|
|
|
83,530 |
|
|
|
80,552 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
* |
|
|
Total shareholders' (deficit) equity |
|
|
(1,483,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,493,203 |
) |
|
|
(1,207,142 |
) |
|
|
(1,402,445 |
) |
|
|
(1,166,906 |
) |
|
* |
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
138,731 |
|
|
|
426,094 |
|
|
|
400,210 |
|
|
|
367,830 |
|
|
|
156,854 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Funds from operations ("FFO")(3) |
|
|
300,937 |
|
|
|
373,741 |
|
|
|
352,477 |
|
|
|
346,051 |
|
|
|
259,829 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Diluted FFO per common share |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO")(3) |
|
|
412,458 |
|
|
|
443,755 |
|
|
|
424,824 |
|
|
|
398,537 |
|
|
|
267,077 |
|
|
* |
|
|
Diluted AFFO per common share |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
* |
|
* Information not applicable for periods presented
(1) |
For periods prior to April 24, 2015, amounts represent revenues of the Consumer CLEC Business as an integrated operation within Windstream. |
(2) |
As of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, amount includes $53.0 million, $55.3 million, $56.3 million and $54.5 million of finance lease obligations, respectively. |
(3) |
For a more detailed discussion and reconciliation of FFO and AFFO, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Item 7. |
34
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition, and changes in financial condition, as well as our critical accounting estimates.
Overview
Company Description
Uniti Group Inc. (the “Company”, “Uniti”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is an independent, internally managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) engaged in the acquisition and construction of mission critical infrastructure in the communications industry. We are principally focused on acquiring and constructing fiber optic broadband networks, wireless communications towers, copper and coaxial broadband networks and data centers.
On April 24, 2015, we were separated and spun-off (the “Spin-Off”) from Windstream Holdings, Inc. (“Windstream Holdings” and together with its subsidiaries, “Windstream”) pursuant to which Windstream contributed certain telecommunications network assets, including fiber and copper networks and other real estate (the “Distribution Systems”) and a small consumer competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) business (the “Consumer CLEC Business”) to Uniti and Uniti issued common stock and indebtedness and paid cash obtained from borrowings under Uniti’s senior credit facilities to Windstream. In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into a long-term exclusive triple-net lease (the “Master Lease”) with Windstream, pursuant to which a substantial portion of our real property is leased to Windstream and from which a substantial portion of our leasing revenues are currently derived.
Uniti operates as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, the Company is generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes on income generated by its REIT operations, which includes income derived from the Master Lease. We have elected to treat the subsidiaries through which we operate our fiber business, Uniti Fiber, certain aspects of our towers business, Uniti Towers, and Talk America Services, LLC, which operates the Consumer CLEC Business (“Talk America”), as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). TRSs enable us to engage in activities that result in income that does not constitute qualifying income for a REIT. Our TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
The Company operates through a customary up-REIT structure, pursuant to which we hold substantially all of our assets through a partnership, Uniti Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), that we control as general partner. This structure is intended to facilitate future acquisition opportunities by providing the Company with the ability to use common units of the Operating Partnership as a tax-efficient acquisition currency. As of December 31, 2019, we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and own approximately 98.2% of the partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.
We expect to grow and diversify our portfolio and tenant base by pursuing a range of transaction structures with communication service providers, including, (i) sale leaseback transactions, whereby we acquire existing infrastructure assets from third parties, including communication service providers, and lease them back on a long-term triple-net basis; (ii) whole company acquisitions, which may include the use of one or more TRSs that are permitted under the tax laws to acquire and operate non-REIT businesses and assets subject to certain limitations; (iii) capital investment financing, whereby we offer communication service providers a cost efficient method of raising funds for discrete capital investments to upgrade or expand their network; and (iv) mergers and acquisitions financing, whereby we facilitate mergers and acquisition transactions as a capital partner, including through operating company/property company (“OpCo-PropCo”) structures.
We manage our operations as four reportable business segments in addition to our corporate operations:
Leasing Segment: Represents the results from our leasing business, Uniti Leasing, which is engaged in the acquisition of mission-critical communications assets and leasing them to anchor customers on either an exclusive or shared-tenant basis. Uniti Leasing is a component of our REIT operations.
35
Fiber Infrastructure Segment: Represents the operations of our fiber business, Uniti Fiber, which is a leading provider of infrastructure solutions, including cell site backhaul and dark fiber, to the telecommunications industry.
Towers Segment: Represents the operations of our towers business, Uniti Towers, through which we acquire and construct tower and tower-related real estate and lease space on communications towers to wireless service providers and other tenants in the United States. On April 2, 2019, the Company completed the sale of Uniti Towers’ Latin American business and no longer has on-going operations in Latin America. On May 23, 2019, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of its ground lease business located across the United States. Portions of our towers business are a component of our REIT operations, while the remainder is owned and operated by our TRSs. Refer to “Significant Business Developments” below regarding the announced sale of U.S. tower assets.
Consumer CLEC Segment: Represents the operations of Talk America through which we operate the Consumer CLEC Business that prior to the Spin-Off was reported as an integrated operation within Windstream. Talk America provides local telephone, high-speed internet and long-distance services to customers in the eastern and central United States. We have commenced a wind down of our Consumer CLEC Business, which we estimate will be completed during the second quarter of 2020.
Corporate Operations: Represents our corporate office and shared service functions. Certain costs and expenses, primarily related to headcount, information technology systems, insurance, professional fees and similar charges, that are directly attributable to operations of our business segments are allocated to the respective segments.
We evaluate the performance of each segment based on Adjusted EBITDA, which is a segment performance measure we define as net income determined in accordance with GAAP, before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, the impact, which may be recurring in nature, of transaction and integration related expenses, costs associated with Windstream’s bankruptcy, costs associated with litigation claims made against us, and costs associated with the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system, the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs, costs incurred as a result of the early repayment of debt, gains or losses on dispositions, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and financial instruments, and other similar items. For more information on Adjusted EBITDA, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Detailed information about our segments can be found in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Significant Business Developments
Windstream Bankruptcy Filing. Prior to its bankruptcy filing described below, Windstream was involved in litigation with an entity who acquired certain Windstream debt securities and thereafter issued a notice of default as to such securities relating to the Spin-Off. Windstream challenged the matter in federal court and a trial was held in July 2018. On February 15, 2019, the federal court judge issued a ruling against Windstream, finding that its attempts to waive such default were not valid; that an “event of default” occurred with respect to such debt securities; and that the holder’s acceleration of such debt in December 2017 was effective. In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as a “debtor in possession” under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court.
Windstream Litigation and Settlement. During the first half of 2019, Windstream’s chief executive officer stated that it was evaluating all options as part of the Chapter 11 reorganization process regarding the Master Lease, including renegotiation, recharacterization and rejection of the Master Lease. As further described below, on July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in an adversary proceeding against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, that certain rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and that Uniti breached certain of its obligations under the Master Lease.
36
On March 2, 2020, Uniti and Windstream jointly announced that they have reached an agreement in principle to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement.
Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti and Windstream will agree to mutual releases with respect to any and all liability related to any claims and causes of action between them, including those relating to Windstream’s Chapter 11 proceedings and the Master Lease. Under the Settlement, Uniti will agree to make a $400 million cash payment to Windstream in equal installments over 20 consecutive quarters beginning the first month after Windstream’s emergence at an annual interest rate of 9%, and Uniti may prepay any installments falling due on or after the first anniversary of the Settlement’s effective date (resulting in total payments ranging from $432-$490 million). Uniti will also transfer the proceeds from the sale of its common stock described below to Windstream. In exchange, Windstream will transfer to Uniti certain dark fiber IRU contracts (that currently generate approximately $21 million in annual operating income before depreciation and amortization) and access rights to 1.8 million fiber strand miles leased by Windstream that is either unutilized or utilized for the dark fiber IRUs being transferred. Uniti will be required to pay Windstream $350 per route mile on any fiber strand miles that are sold above and beyond the fiber strand miles currently being utilized in connection with such dark fiber IRUs. In addition, Uniti will acquire certain Windstream-owned assets, including certain fiber IRU contracts generating $8 million of annual operating income before depreciation and amortization and 0.4 million fiber strand miles covering 4,100 route miles, in exchange for $40.0 million in cash and a 20-year, zero cost, IRU for such strands.
Windstream and Uniti will also agree to bifurcate the Master Lease into two structurally similar, but independent, agreements to govern the ILEC and CLEC facilities, respectively. Certain copper CLEC assets will be governed under the New Lease relating to the ILEC facilities. The initial aggregate annual rent under the New Leases will be equal to the annual rent under the Master Lease currently in effect. Each of Windstream Services, LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and/or newly formed affiliated entities will become parties to the New Leases. The New Leases will contain cross-guarantees and cross-default provisions, which will remain effective as long as Windstream or an affiliate is a tenant under one of the New Leases. In addition, the New Leases will be amended to require that Windstream maintain certain financial covenants and to permit Uniti to transfer its rights and obligations and otherwise monetize or encumber the New Leases so long as it does not transfer interests to a Windstream competitor.
Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti will agree to fund up to an aggregate $1.75 billion in growth capital improvements in long-term fiber and related assets in certain ILEC and CLEC properties. Growth Capital Improvements will exclude maintenance or repair expenditures and expenditures toward fiber replacement in excess of $70 million per year and will be subject to Uniti’s approval based on underwriting standards to be included in the New Leases. Annual commitments by Uniti for the Growth Capital Improvements will comprise: $125 million in 2020; $225 million per year in 2021 through 2024; $175 million per year in 2025 and 2026; and $125 million per year in 2027 through 2029. Windstream will be entitled to reimbursement for any cumulative Growth Capital Improvements it incurs in excess of the foregoing annual amounts from the commitment amounts in a subsequent period. On the first anniversary of an installment of funding for a Growth Capital Improvement, the annual base rent payable by Windstream will increase by an amount equal to 8.0% of such installment of funding. The Rent Rate will thereafter increase to 100.5% of the prior Rent Rate in subsequent years.
Pursuant to the Settlement, if Windstream is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Leases, Uniti will not be required to fund Growth Capital Improvements. In the event Uniti defaults or otherwise fails to timely satisfy its obligations under the New Leases and Windstream is in compliance with the terms of the New Leases, then Windstream has the right to deduct from the subsequent rent payment or payments, amounts otherwise owed to Windstream.
In connection with the Settlement, Uniti also entered into binding letters of intent on March 2, 2020 with certain first lien creditors of Windstream, pursuant to which Uniti will sell an aggregate of 38,633,470 shares of Uniti common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at $6.33 per share, which represents the closing price of Uniti common stock on the date when an agreement in principle of the basic outline of the Settlement was first reached. Uniti will transfer the proceeds from the sale of the Settlement Common Stock to Windstream as additional settlement consideration.
37
The issuance and sale of the Settlement Common Stock will be made in reliance upon the exemption from registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Certain recipients of the Settlement Common Stock will be subject to a one-year lock up, and all recipients will be subject to a customary standstill agreement. No recipient will receive any governance rights in connection with the issuance.
Finally, on March 2, 2020, Uniti, Windstream and certain of Windstream’s creditors entered into a Plan Support Agreement. Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, the Parties agreed to support the Settlement and the approval of a plan of reorganization for Windstream on the terms and subject to the conditions described therein. The Plan Support Agreement is terminable by the Parties upon the occurrence of certain specified termination events, including, among other things, (i) the failure to meet certain case milestones, including failure by Windstream to file a motion to approve the Settlement by March 12, 2020 and failure to obtain approval of the Settlement from the bankruptcy court by April 6, 2020, (ii) failure by Windstream to timely appeal any order by the bankruptcy court denying the Settlement or any order overturning an order approving the Settlement on appeal, and (iii) the issuance by a regulatory authority of an order enjoining, or the commencement of an action that could be reasonably expected to enjoin, material portions of the settlement or substantial consummation of the Settlement (subject to a 10 day cure period). The parties to the Plan Support Agreement expect the Plan to become effective, and for Windstream to emerge from bankruptcy, by August 29, 2020.
The Settlement is subject to negotiation and execution of definitive documentation and certain regulatory approvals and conditions precedent, including bankruptcy court approval and Uniti’s receipt of satisfactory “true lease” opinions confirming that the New Leases are “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the settlement is not approved, Windstream could continue its litigation. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings. If that occurs, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring. However, any adverse determination or judicial decision on one or more of the claims against us could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition or, in certain circumstances, cause us to file for voluntary Chapter 11 protection.
Going Concern. There are conditions and events which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and in its opinion on our December 31, 2019 financial statements, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, expressed substantial doubt as to whether we could continue as a going concern during the one year period following the date those financial statements were issued as a result of Windstream’s bankruptcy petition, the bankruptcy’s potential uncertain effects on the Master Lease, and uncertainties surrounding the satisfaction of conditions required for our settlement with Windstream to be effectuated. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If the settlement is not implemented, we expect Windstream will continue to perform on the Master Lease and believe it is unlikely that Windstream will reject the Master Lease because the Master Lease is central to Windstream’s operations. We also believe that it is unlikely that a court will determine that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing transaction, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property, or that rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers. We have reduced our dividend and may reduce our capital expenditures, as well as seek external funding in order to sustain our operations. The failure to provide 2019 audited financial statements without a going concern opinion to the lenders under our Credit Agreement by March 31, 2020 would have constituted a breach of the covenants and an immediate event of default under our Credit Agreement, unless waived by our lenders. If an event of default were to have occurred under our Credit Agreement, the Credit Agreement’s administrative agent could have declared all outstanding loans immediately due and payable. Such an acceleration would have triggered cross-default provisions within the indentures governing our senior notes and thereby would have entitled the trustee and noteholders to accelerate the repayment of the senior notes.
On February 10, 2020, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2019 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the sixth amendment to our Credit Agreement. See “—Amendments to Credit Agreement” below.
Secured Notes Offering. On February 10, 2020, the Operating Partnership, CSL Capital, LLC, Uniti Group Finance 2019 Inc. and Uniti Fiber, as co-issuers, issued $2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior secured
38
notes due 2025 at an issue prices of 100% of par value. The issuers used the proceeds from the offering to repay all $2.05 billion of outstanding term loans under our senior secured credit facilities and to repay approximately $156.7 million of revolving loans (and terminated related commitments of approximately $157.6 million).
Sale of U.S. Tower Assets. In February 2020, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell 486 of our U.S. towers located across 32 states for total cash consideration of approximately $190 million, subject to adjustments. Concurrent with the sale of the U.S. towers, we entered into a strategic “off-take” tower arrangement with a wireless infrastructure partner. Pursuant to the “off-take” arrangement, we will continue to build towers in the U.S. and sell those towers to our partner at an agreed upon price during 2020. We also have the option to extend the “off-take” arrangement to 2021.
The definitive agreement includes a "go-shop" provision, which permits Uniti's Board of Directors and its advisors to solicit alternative proposals from third parties. Uniti will have the right to terminate the agreement to enter into a superior proposal subject to certain terms and conditions.
Bluebird Network, LLC. On August 30, 2019, the Company closed on its OpCo-PropCo transaction with Macquarie Infrastructure Partners (“MIP”) to acquire Bluebird Network, LLC (“Bluebird”). MIP operates within the Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets division of Macquarie Group. Bluebird’s network consists of approximately 178,000 fiber strand miles in the Midwest across Missouri, Kansas, Illinois and Oklahoma. In the transaction, Uniti has purchased the Bluebird fiber network and MIP has purchased the Bluebird operations. In addition, Uniti has sold Uniti Fiber’s Midwest operations to MIP, while Uniti retains its existing Midwest fiber network. Uniti acquired the fiber network of Bluebird for $321 million, of which $175 million was funded by Uniti in cash and $144 million from pre-paid rent received from MIP at closing. In connection with the sale of the Company’s Midwest operations, we received total upfront cash of approximately $37 million, including related pre-paid rent received from MIP at closing. Concurrently with the closing of these transactions, Uniti leased the Bluebird fiber network and its Midwest fiber network on a combined basis to MIP, under a long-term triple net lease. The lease is reported within the results of our Leasing segment. The Midwest operations that were sold to MIP was previously reported in our Fiber Infrastructure segment.
Under the terms of our lease with MIP (the “Bluebird Lease”), we have the right, but not the obligation, to fund growth capital expenditures. Assets constructed with our capital become a part of the leased assets upon completion. MIP will compensate the Company from the date of funding based on a mix of fixed and variable payments as stipulated in the lease agreement. The Company will recognize revenue associated with these assets from the date of completion through the end of the initial lease term. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has committed to fund approximately $22.7 million of growth capital expenditures, of which $11.4 million was funded during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion. On July 2, 2019, the Company issued 8,677,163 shares of its common stock in connection with the conversion by PEG Bandwidth Holdings, LLC of 87,500 shares of the Company’s 3.00% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Shares”). The Company issued common stock with a total value of $87.5 million, with the total number of shares calculated based on the five-day volume weighted average price of its common stock ending on June 27, 2019. Upon conversion, all outstanding Series A Shares were cancelled and no longer remain outstanding.
Exchangeable Notes Offering. On June 28, 2019, Uniti Fiber Holdings Inc. (“Uniti Fiber”), a subsidiary of the Company, issued $345 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2024 (the “Exchangeable Notes”). The Exchangeable Notes are guaranteed by the Company and each of the Company’s subsidiaries (other than Uniti Fiber) that is an issuer, obligor or guarantor under the Company’s other outstanding notes. The Exchangeable Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2019. The Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof, at Uniti Fiber’s election. The Exchangeable Notes will mature on June 15, 2024, unless earlier exchanged, redeemed or repurchased.
The net proceeds from the sale of the Exchangeable Notes were approximately $334.7 million, after deducting discounts and commissions to the initial purchasers of the Exchangeable Notes. A portion of the net proceeds were used to repay outstanding borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility, variable rate, that matures
39
April 24, 2022 pursuant to the Credit Agreement (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), as described below, and to pay the cost of the exchangeable note hedge transactions, as described in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The remaining net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, which included funding acquisitions and the repayment of additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Amendments to Credit Agreement. On June 24, 2019, we entered into an amendment (the “Fifth Amendment”) to our Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date of $575.9 million of commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility to April 24, 2022, pay down approximately $101.6 million of outstanding revolving loans and terminate the related commitments. The maturity date of approximately $72.4 million of other commitments was not extended. On June 28, 2019, the Company repaid approximately $174.0 million in total borrowings, which consisted of the $101.6 million required repayment pursuant to the Fifth Amendment and $72.4 million of non-extended borrowings, thereby terminating the non-extended commitments. As a result, all remaining $575.9 million of commitments will terminate on April 24, 2022, at which time all outstanding borrowings must be repaid. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering of Exchangeable Notes described above to fund the repayments.
On February 10, 2020, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2019 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the Sixth Amendment to our Credit Agreement. In addition to the restrictions imposed by the Fourth Amendment (as set forth in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors”), which remain effective, the Sixth Amendment also limits the ability of our non-guarantor subsidiaries to incur indebtedness. The Sixth Amendment increased the interest rate on our revolving facility by 100 bps for each applicable rate. As amended, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.25% or a eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 4.75% to 5.25%, in each case, calculated in a customary manner and determined based on our consolidated secured leverage ratio.
Sale of Ground Lease Portfolio. The Company completed the sale of substantially all of its ground lease business located across the United States for cash consideration of approximately $33.6 million, realizing a pre-tax gain of $5.2 million.
Sale of Latin American Tower Portfolio. During 2019, the Company completed the sale of the Uniti Towers’ Latin American business to an entity controlled by Phoenix Towers International (“PTI”). At closing, PTI acquired 498 towers located across Mexico, Colombia and Nicaragua. Total consideration was approximately $100 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a pre-tax gain of $23.8 million related to this sale.
Consumer CLEC Business. On April 23, 2019, Windstream provided notice to Uniti of its termination of (i) the Wholesale Master Services Agreement between Windstream Communications, Inc. and Talk America, (ii) the Master Services Agreement between Windstream Services, LLC and Talk America, and (iii) the Billing and Remittance Agreement between Windstream Services, LLC and CSL National, LP, each dated April 24, 2015 (collectively the “Agreements”). The termination of the Agreements is effective April 20, 2020. Under the Agreements, Windstream provides us transport, provisioning, repair and billing and collection services necessary to operate our Consumer CLEC Business. We currently do not have the infrastructure necessary to perform these services in the absence of the Agreements. We have evaluated the costs of building out the required infrastructure and have determined that incurring such costs would not be economically feasible. Furthermore, we have evaluated potential strategic alternatives with respect to the Consumer CLEC Business, including retaining other vendors to perform the services currently provided under the Agreements, and an outright sale of all or parts of the business, but have not identified viable alternatives. As a result, we have commenced a wind down of our Consumer CLEC Business, which includes customer notifications and terminations. We anticipate that the business will be completely wound down prior to the April 20, 2020 effective date of the termination of the Agreements. The subsidiaries comprising our Consumer CLEC Business are direct subsidiaries of Uniti Group Inc. and are not subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, which is a primary obligor and/or guarantor under our Credit Agreement and our outstanding notes, and do not guarantee such debt. Other than the assets and liabilities and results related to the Consumer CLEC Business, which are immaterial, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership and Uniti Group Inc. are identical in all material respects.
40
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
The following tables sets forth, for the periods indicated, our results of operations expressed as dollars and as a percentage of total revenues:
(Thousands) |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
% of Revenues |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
% of Revenues |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
$ |
716,640 |
|
|
67.8% |
|
|
$ |
699,847 |
|
|
68.8% |
|
||
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
315,605 |
|
|
29.8% |
|
|
|
289,239 |
|
|
28.4% |
|
||
Tower |
|
|
14,693 |
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
|
14,617 |
|
|
1.4% |
|
||
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
10,673 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
1.4% |
|
||
Total revenues |
|
|
1,057,611 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
1,017,634 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
||
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
390,112 |
|
|
36.9% |
|
|
|
319,591 |
|
|
31.4% |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
405,754 |
|
|
38.4% |
|
|
|
451,750 |
|
|
44.4% |
|
||
General and administrative expense |
|
|
102,900 |
|
|
9.7% |
|
|
|
85,198 |
|
|
8.4% |
|
||
Operating expense (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
160,024 |
|
|
15.1% |
|
|
|
137,065 |
|
|
13.5% |
|
||
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
43,708 |
|
|
4.1% |
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
|
1.7% |
|
||
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(28,995 |
) |
|
(2.7%) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
||
Other income, net |
|
|
(31,463 |
) |
|
(3.0%) |
|
|
|
(4,504 |
) |
|
(0.4%) |
|
||
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
1,042,040 |
|
|
98.5% |
|
|
|
1,006,510 |
|
|
98.9% |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
15,571 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
|
|
11,124 |
|
|
1.1% |
|
||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
(0.5%) |
|
||
Net income |
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
16,545 |
|
|
1.6% |
|
||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
326 |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
0.0% |
|
||
Net income attributable to shareholders |
|
|
10,582 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
16,187 |
|
|
1.6% |
|
||
Participating securities' share in earnings |
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
(2,594 |
) |
|
(0.2%) |
|
||
Dividends declared on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
(0.1%) |
|
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
(0.3%) |
|
||
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
(0.1%) |
|
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
(0.3%) |
|
||
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
8,384 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
$ |
7,989 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
41
The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of our reportable segments:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
716,640 |
|
|
$ |
315,605 |
|
|
$ |
14,693 |
|
|
$ |
10,673 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,057,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
711,119 |
|
|
$ |
126,754 |
|
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
|
$ |
(26,494 |
) |
|
$ |
812,739 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
99.2 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
|
(4.0 |
%) |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
76.8 |
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,112 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
282,107 |
|
|
|
114,566 |
|
|
|
6,474 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
405,754 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,219 |
) |
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,708 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,995 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,908 |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
699,847 |
|
|
$ |
289,239 |
|
|
$ |
14,617 |
|
|
$ |
13,931 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,017,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
697,545 |
|
|
$ |
123,389 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
3,353 |
|
|
$ |
(21,759 |
) |
|
$ |
802,883 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
99.7 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
78.9 |
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,591 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
337,126 |
|
|
|
105,651 |
|
|
|
6,704 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
451,750 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,504 |
) |
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,545 |
|
Revenues
Leasing – Leasing revenues are primarily attributable to rental revenue from leasing our Distribution Systems to Windstream Holdings pursuant to the Master Lease. Under the Master Lease, Windstream Holdings is responsible for the costs related to operating the Distribution Systems, including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs. As a result, we do not record an obligation related to the payment of property taxes, as Windstream makes direct payments to the taxing authorities. The Master Lease has an initial term of 15 years with four 5-year renewal options and encompasses properties located in 29 states. Annual cash rent under the Master Lease is currently $657 million and is subject to an annual escalation of 0.5% each May through the initial term.
We adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASC 842”) as of January 1, 2019. This standard supersedes prior guidance regarding the evaluation of collectability of lease receivables, including straight-line revenue receivables. We evaluated the collectability of our straight-line revenue receivable associated with the Master Lease in accordance with the transition provisions of ASC 842, and at the date of adoption, due to uncertainties surrounding Windstream’s operations and liquidity, including uncertainties surrounding the outcome of
42
Windstream’s pending litigation, we concluded that it was not probable that we would collect all future payments due to the Company over the initial term of the Master Lease. As a result, effective January 1, 2019, the Company recorded the Master Lease on a cash basis in accordance with ASC 842 and will not reflect a straight-line revenue receivable until a time at which collectability of all future rents is determined to be probable. At the adoption of ASC 842, we reflected the write-off of the straight-line revenue balance as of January 1, 2019 as a $61.5 million adjustment to equity resulting from the change in accounting principle.
The Master Lease provides that tenant funded capital improvements (“TCIs”), defined as maintenance, repair, overbuild, upgrade or replacement to the Distribution Systems, including without limitation, the replacement of copper distribution systems with fiber distribution systems, automatically become property of Uniti upon their construction by Windstream. We receive non-monetary consideration related to TCIs as they automatically become our property, and we recognize the cost basis of TCIs that are capital in nature as real estate investments and deferred revenue. We depreciate the real estate investments over their estimated useful lives and amortize the deferred revenue as additional leasing revenues over the same depreciable life of the TCI assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $687.9 million of revenue from rents under the Master Lease, which included $29.0 million of TCI revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized $693.9 million of revenue under the Master Lease, which included $23.1 million of non-cash TCI revenue and $15.1 million of non-cash straight-line rental revenue. The increase in TCI revenue is attributable to continued investment by Windstream in TCIs. Windstream invested $164.7 million in TCIs during the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase from $153.6 million it invested in TCIs during the year ended December 31, 2018. Since the inception of the Master Lease, Windstream has invested a total of $771.8 million in such improvements.
Because a substantial portion of our revenue and cash flows are derived from lease payments by Windstream pursuant to the Master Lease, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and/or ability to maintain our status as a REIT and service debt if Windstream were to reject the Master Lease in bankruptcy, default under the Master Lease, succeed in its claims against us or otherwise experiences operating or liquidity difficulties and becomes unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us. In recent years, Windstream has experienced annual declines in its total revenue, sales and cash flow, has had its credit ratings downgraded by nationally recognized credit rating agencies multiple times over the past 12 months and, on February 25, 2019, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.
Windstream’s stock is quoted on the OTC Markets under the ticker symbol “WINMQ.” Windstream is subject to the periodic filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, but Windstream is not current in its reporting obligations. Windstream filings can be found at www.sec.gov. Windstream filings are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $28.7 million of leasing revenues from non-Windstream triple-net leasing and dark fiber IRU arrangements, including $7.2 million of revenue related to the Bluebird transaction that closed on August 30, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized $6.0 million from non-Windstream triple-net leasing and dark fiber IRU arrangements. The increase in non-Windstream related revenues is due to the timing of closing sale-leaseback transactions, including the Bluebird transaction.
43
Fiber Infrastructure – For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized $315.6 million and $289.2 million of revenue, respectively, in our Fiber Infrastructure segment. The increase is primarily driven by the timing of the Information Transport Solutions, Inc. (“ITS”) acquisition that occurred on October 19, 2018, which contributed revenues of $36.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $9.0 million of revenues from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2018. Revenue components for the Fiber Infrastructure segment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
||||
Fiber Infrastructure revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lit backhaul services |
|
$ |
125,983 |
|
|
39.9% |
|
|
$ |
132,361 |
|
|
45.8% |
|
||
Enterprise and wholesale |
|
|
66,545 |
|
|
21.1% |
|
|
|
63,519 |
|
|
22.0% |
|
||
E-Rate and government |
|
|
89,430 |
|
|
28.3% |
|
|
|
74,752 |
|
|
25.8% |
|
||
Dark fiber and small cells |
|
|
31,245 |
|
|
9.9% |
|
|
|
14,115 |
|
|
4.9% |
|
||
Other services |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
||
Total Fiber Infrastructure revenues |
|
$ |
315,605 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
$ |
289,239 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
At December 31, 2019, we had approximately 20,900 customer connections, up from 18,200 customer connections at December 31, 2018.
Towers – Towers revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
||||
Towers revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
12,141 |
|
|
82.6% |
|
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
35.6% |
|
||
Latin America |
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
17.4% |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
64.4% |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
14,693 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
$ |
14,617 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
The increased revenue in the United States for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, is primarily driven by our development activities, and the inclusion of a non-recurring charge of $1.1 million related to the accounting of straight-line rents during the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the construction of 242 towers in the U.S. At December 31, 2019, the Uniti Towers’ domestic portfolio consisted of 672 wireless communications towers located in 33 states across the eastern and central regions in the United States, an increase from 430 wireless communications towers at December 31, 2018. The decrease in revenues in Latin America compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 is due to the April 2, 2019 sale of our Latin American tower portfolio.
Consumer CLEC – For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $10.7 million of revenue from the Consumer CLEC Business, compared to $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily attributable to a loss of customers during the period. We served approximately 10,800 customers as of December 31, 2019, a 52% decrease from 22,500 at December 31, 2018. We have commenced a wind down of our Consumer CLEC Business, which we expect to be completed by the second quarter of 2020.
44
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, totaled $390.1 million, which includes non-cash interest expense of $42.8 million resulting from the amortization of our debt discounts and debt issuance costs, partially offset by $3.1 million of capitalized interest. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018, totaled $319.6 million, which includes non-cash interest expense of $24.6 million resulting from the amortization of our debt discounts and debt issuance costs, partially offset by $5.6 million of capitalized interest.
The increase is primarily related to an increase of interest expense of $31.9 million on the Term Loan Facility as a result of the Fourth Amendment to our Credit Agreement, which increased the rate of our term loans by 200 basis points effective March 18, 2019, an increase of interest expense of $13.2 million on the Revolving Credit Facility primarily due to the Fifth Amendment to our Credit Agreement, which, until our entry into the Sixth Amendment on February 10, 2020, increased the rate by 200 basis points effective June 24, 2019, and an increase of $7.0 million of cash interest expense incurred on our 4.0% Exchangeable Notes issued June 28, 2019. Furthermore, there was an increase in non-cash interest expense from the amortization of our debt discounts and debt issuance costs of $18.2 million related to the issues of the Exchangeable Notes and as a result of the Fourth Amendment.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
We incur depreciation and amortization expense related to our property, plant and equipment, corporate assets and intangible assets. Charges for depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled $405.8 million, which included $378.6 million of depreciation expense and $27.2 million of amortization expense. Charges for depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $451.8 million, which included property, plant and equipment depreciation of $425.2 million and intangible asset amortization of $26.6 million.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses include compensation costs, including stock-based compensation awards, professional and legal services, corporate office costs and other costs associated with the administrative activities of our segments. For the year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative costs totaled $102.9 million, which includes $10.8 million of stock-based compensation expense. For the year ended December 31, 2018, general and administrative costs totaled $85.2 million, which includes $8.1 million of stock-based compensation expense. The remaining $15.0 million, or 17.6%, increase in 2019 over 2018 is primarily driven by increased legal & professional fees, increased insurance costs, and increased labor costs.
Operating Expense
Operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, totaled $160.0 million compared to $137.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Operating expense for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Consolidated Revenues |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Consolidated Revenues |
|
||||
Operating expense by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
$ |
139,460 |
|
|
13.2% |
|
|
$ |
117,781 |
|
|
11.5% |
|
||
Towers |
|
|
9,819 |
|
|
0.9% |
|
|
|
7,989 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
||
CLEC |
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
|
10,576 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
||
Leasing |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
0.1% |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
160,024 |
|
|
15.1% |
|
|
$ |
137,065 |
|
|
13.4% |
|
Fiber Infrastructure – For the year ended December 31, 2019, Fiber Infrastructure operating expenses totaled $139.5 million as compared to $117.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Operating expense consists of
45
network related costs, such as dark fiber and tower rents, and lit service and maintenance expense. In addition, costs associated with our construction activities are presented within operating expenses. The increase in operating expenses is primarily attributable to the timing of the ITS acquisition that occurred on October 19, 2018, which incurred operating expenses of $26.5 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Towers – Our Towers segment operating expense primarily consists of ground rent, some or all of which may be passed to our tenants, as well as property taxes, regulatory fees and maintenance and repairs expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Towers operating expense was $9.8 million and included $8.8 million of expenses related to our U.S. towers operations and $1.0 million related to our Latin American tower operations. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Towers operating expense was $8.0 million and included $4.0 million of expenses related to our U.S. towers operations and $4.0 million related to our Latin American tower operations. The increase in the U.S. in primarily driven by our development activities, while the decrease in Latin America is due to the sale of our Latin American tower portfolio.
Consumer CLEC – Expense associated with the Consumer CLEC Business is primarily attributable to the Wholesale Agreement and the Master Services Agreement entered into between us and Windstream in connection with the Spin-Off, and also includes costs arising under the interconnection agreements with other telecommunication carriers. Expense associated with the Wholesale Agreement and Master Services Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled $5.9 million (0.6% of revenue) and $0.6 million (0.1% of revenue), respectively, and expense associated with the Wholesale Agreement and the Master Services Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $7.8 million (0.8% of revenue) and $0.7 million (0.1% of revenue), respectively.
Transaction Related and Other Costs
Transaction costs included incremental acquisition, pursuit, transaction and integration costs, including unsuccessful acquisition pursuit costs. In addition, these costs include costs incurred as a result of Windstream’s bankruptcy filing, costs associated with Windstream’s claims against us and costs associated with the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we incurred $43.7 million of transaction related and other costs, compared to $17.4 million of such costs during the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is primarily related to $32.8 million of total costs associated with the non-capitalizable Bluebird asset acquisition expenses, sale of our Latin America Tower portfolio, costs related to the Windstream bankruptcy, costs associated with Windstream’s claims against us and costs associated with the implementation of our enterprise resource planning system. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in Uniti Fiber integration costs of $3.3 million.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized realized gains of $23.8 million and $5.1 million related to the sale of Uniti Towers’ Latin American business and sale of our U.S. ground lease business, respectively.
Other Income, net
We recognized $31.5 million of other income for the year ended December 31, 2019, which included a $28.5 million unrealized gain for mark-to-market adjustments on our contingent consideration arrangements. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2018, totaled $4.5 million, primarily as a result of a net unrealized gain of $3.7 million for mark-to-market adjustments on our contingent consideration arrangements.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
We recorded a $4.7 million income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. Included in income tax expense is approximately $15.6 million of income tax expense related to (i) expense related to the cancellation of debt income that was recognized for federal income tax purposes as a result of the Fourth Amendment ($4.6 million), (ii) expense related to capital gain from the sale of Uniti Towers’ Latin American business ($4.6 million), (iii) expense related to undistributed income from operations ($3.2 million), (iv) expense attributable to
46
unrecognized tax benefit related to the sale of Uniti Towers’ Latin American business ($2.9 million) and (v) expense related to franchise and gross receipts taxes ($0.3 million). Income tax expense was partially offset by a $10.9 million income tax benefit related to pre-tax loss in our Fiber Infrastructure segment. We recorded a $5.4 million income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2018, $1.3 million of which relates to the impact of the reduction in the corporate tax rate under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on purchase price allocation adjustments recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and the remainder of which is primarily driven by pre-tax loss in our Fiber Infrastructure segment.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
The following tables sets forth, for the periods indicated, our results of operations expressed as dollars and as a percentage of total revenues:
(Thousands) |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
% of Revenues |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|
% of Revenues |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
$ |
699,847 |
|
|
68.8% |
|
|
$ |
685,099 |
|
|
74.8% |
|
||
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
289,239 |
|
|
28.4% |
|
|
|
202,791 |
|
|
22.1% |
|
||
Tower |
|
|
14,617 |
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
|
10,055 |
|
|
1.1% |
|
||
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
|
18,087 |
|
|
2.0% |
|
||
Total revenues |
|
|
1,017,634 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
916,032 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
||
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
319,591 |
|
|
31.4% |
|
|
|
305,994 |
|
|
33.4% |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
451,750 |
|
|
44.4% |
|
|
|
434,205 |
|
|
47.4% |
|
||
General and administrative expense |
|
|
85,198 |
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
|
72,045 |
|
|
7.9% |
|
||
Operating expense (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
137,065 |
|
|
13.5% |
|
|
|
102,176 |
|
|
11.2% |
|
||
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
17,410 |
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
|
38,005 |
|
|
4.1% |
|
||
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(4,504 |
) |
|
(0.4%) |
|
|
|
11,284 |
|
|
1.2% |
|
||
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
1,006,510 |
|
|
98.9% |
|
|
|
963,709 |
|
|
105.2% |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
11,124 |
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
|
(47,677 |
) |
|
(5.2%) |
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
(0.5%) |
|
|
|
(38,849 |
) |
|
(4.2%) |
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
16,545 |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
(8,828 |
) |
|
(1.0%) |
|
||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
358 |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
0.1% |
|
||
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders |
|
|
16,187 |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
(1.0%) |
|
||
Participating securities' share in earnings |
|
|
(2,594 |
) |
|
(0.2%) |
|
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
|
(0.2%) |
|
||
Dividends declared on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
(0.3%) |
|
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
(0.3%) |
|
||
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
(0.3%) |
|
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
(0.3%) |
|
||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,989 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
$ |
(16,552 |
) |
|
(1.8%) |
|
47
The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of our reportable segments:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
699,847 |
|
|
$ |
289,239 |
|
|
$ |
14,617 |
|
|
$ |
13,931 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,017,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
697,545 |
|
|
$ |
123,389 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
3,353 |
|
|
$ |
(21,759 |
) |
|
$ |
802,883 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
99.7 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
78.9 |
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,591 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
337,126 |
|
|
|
105,651 |
|
|
|
6,704 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
451,750 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,504 |
) |
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,545 |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
685,099 |
|
|
$ |
202,791 |
|
|
$ |
10,055 |
|
|
$ |
18,087 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
916,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
683,651 |
|
|
$ |
83,987 |
|
|
$ |
(831 |
) |
|
$ |
4,556 |
|
|
$ |
(21,839 |
) |
|
$ |
749,524 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
99.8 |
% |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
(8.3 |
%) |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
81.8 |
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,994 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
347,999 |
|
|
|
78,307 |
|
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
434,205 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,284 |
|
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,005 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,713 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,849 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,828 |
) |
Revenues
Leasing – For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized $693.9 million of revenue under the Master Lease, which included $23.1 million of non-cash TCI revenue and $15.1 million of non-cash straight-line rental revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized $685.1 million of revenue under the Master Lease, which included $14.3 million of non-cash TCI revenue and $17.3 million of non-cash straight-line rental revenue. The increase in TCI revenue is attributable to continued investment by Windstream in TCIs. Windstream invested $153.6 million in TCIs during the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease from $228.0 million it invested in TCIs during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Fiber Infrastructure – In the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recognized $289.2 and $202.8 of revenue, in our Fiber Infrastructure segment. The increase is primarily attributable to the timing of the acquisitions of Southern Light, LLC (“Southern Light”) and Hunt Telecommunications LLC (“Hunt”), which were both acquired on July 3, 2017. Southern Light and Hunt contributed revenues of $132.8 million and $61.9 million, to our consolidated results for the year-ended December 31, 2018 and for the period from the date of acquisition through
48
December 31, 2017, respectively. In addition, we acquired ITS on October 19, 2018, which contributed $9.0 million of revenues from the date of acquisition to December 31, 2018. Revenue components for the Fiber Infrastructure segment for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
||||
Fiber Infrastructure revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lit backhaul services |
|
$ |
132,361 |
|
|
45.8% |
|
|
$ |
117,574 |
|
|
58.0% |
|
||
Enterprise and wholesale |
|
|
63,519 |
|
|
22.0% |
|
|
|
36,542 |
|
|
18.0% |
|
||
E-Rate and government |
|
|
74,752 |
|
|
25.8% |
|
|
|
43,021 |
|
|
21.2% |
|
||
Dark fiber and small cells |
|
|
14,115 |
|
|
4.9% |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
2.6% |
|
||
Other services |
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
0.2% |
|
||
Total Fiber Infrastructure revenues |
|
$ |
289,239 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
$ |
202,791 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
At December 31, 2018, we had approximately 18,200 customer connections, up from 16,750 customer connections at December 31, 2017.
Towers – Towers revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Segment Revenues |
|
||||
Towers revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
35.6% |
|
|
$ |
2,599 |
|
|
25.8% |
|
||
Latin America |
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
64.4% |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
|
74.2% |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
14,617 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
$ |
10,055 |
|
|
100.0% |
|
The increased revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, is primarily driven by our development activities in the United States and acquisition of additional NMS development towers in Latin America pursuant to our purchase agreement with Network Management Holdings LTD (“NMS”). During 2018 we completed the construction of 203 towers in the U.S. and added 58 towers in Latin America, of which 39 were NMS development towers. As of December 31, 2018, we acquired 89 of the 105 towers that were under development at the time of the NMS acquisition, and the remaining 16 development towers were cancelled and will not be completed and purchased.
At December 31, 2018, the Uniti Towers’ portfolio consisted of 430 wireless communications towers located in 26 states across the eastern and central regions in the United States, and 498 wireless communications towers in Latin America.
Consumer CLEC – For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized $13.9 million of revenue from the Consumer CLEC Business, compared to $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease is primarily attributable to a loss of customers during the period. We served approximately 22,500 customers as of December 31, 2018, a 21.1% decrease from 28,500 at December 31, 2017. The decrease in customers is due to the effects of competition and customer attrition.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018, totaled $319.6 million, which includes non-cash interest expense of $24.6 million resulting from the amortization of our debt discounts and debt issuance costs, partially offset by $5.6 million of capitalized interest. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017,
49
totaled $306.0 million, which includes non-cash interest expense of $23.1 million resulting from the amortization of our debt discounts and debt issuance costs. The increase is related to $5.9 million of interest expense on the 2024 Notes issued in May of 2017, an increase in interest expense incurred on the Revolving Credit Facility of $10.8 million due to increased borrowings and LIBOR rates compared to the prior year. This was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense related to capitalized interest of $5.6 million, which was not incurred in the year ended December 31, 2017.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
We incur depreciation and amortization expense related to our property, plant and equipment, corporate assets and intangible assets. Charges for depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $451.8 million, which included property, plant and equipment depreciation of $425.2 million and intangible asset amortization of $26.6 million. Charges for depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $434.2 million, which included property, plant and equipment depreciation of $415.9 million and intangible asset amortization of $18.3 million. The increase is primarily driven by the timing of the acquisitions of Southern Light and Hunt that closed on July 3, 2017.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses include compensation costs (including stock-based compensation awards), professional and legal services, corporate office costs and other costs associated with the administrative activities of our segments. For the year ended December 31, 2018, general and administrative costs totaled $85.2 million, which includes $8.1 million of stock-based compensation expense. For the year ended December 31, 2017, general and administrative costs totaled $72.0 million, which includes $7.7 million of stock-based compensation expense. The increase is primarily driven by the timing of the acquisitions of Southern Light and Hunt that closed on July 3, 2017.
Operating Expense
Operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2018, totaled $137.1 million compared to $102.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Operating expense for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Consolidated Revenues |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of Consolidated Revenues |
|
||||
Operating expense by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
$ |
117,781 |
|
|
11.5% |
|
|
$ |
83,515 |
|
|
9.1% |
|
||
Towers |
|
|
7,989 |
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
0.6% |
|
||
CLEC |
|
|
10,576 |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
13,530 |
|
|
1.5% |
|
||
Leasing |
|
|
719 |
|
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
0.0% |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
137,065 |
|
|
13.4% |
|
|
$ |
102,176 |
|
|
11.2% |
|
Fiber Infrastructure – The increase to Fiber Infrastructure operating expense is primarily driven by the timing of the acquisitions of Southern Light and Hunt. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Fiber Infrastructure operating expenses totaled $117.8 million as compared to $83.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The remaining increase was primarily driven by an increase in construction-related expenses and network costs, specifically lit service and maintenance expenses.
50
Towers – Our Towers segment operating expense consists primarily of ground rent, some or all of which may be passed to our tenants, as well as regulatory fees and maintenance and repairs. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Towers operating expense included $5.1 million of ground rent expense, compared to $3.2 million of ground rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2017. The change is attributable to an increase in completed towers at December 31, 2018 from December 31, 2017, driven by our development activity in the United States and acquisition of additional NMS development towers in Latin America.
Consumer CLEC – Expense associated with the Consumer CLEC Business is primarily attributable to the Wholesale Agreement and the Master Services Agreement entered into between us and Windstream in connection with the Spin-Off, and also includes costs arising under the interconnection agreements with other telecommunication carriers. Expense associated with the Wholesale Agreement and Master Services Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $7.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and expense associated with the Wholesale Agreement and the Master Services Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $10.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Other (Income) Expense
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2018, totaled $4.5 million, primarily as a result of a net unrealized gain of $3.7 million for mark-to-market adjustments on our contingent consideration arrangements. Other expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, totaled $11.3 million, primarily as a result of a net unrealized loss of $10.7 million for mark-to-market adjustments on our contingent consideration arrangements.
Income Tax Benefit
We recorded $5.4 million in income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2018. This benefit was primarily driven by pre-tax losses in our Fiber Infrastructure Segment which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $6.1 million, including $1.3 million of income tax benefit related to the impact of the 2017 tax reform legislation on certain purchase accounting adjustments related to 2017 acquisitions that were recorded in 2018. We recorded a combined income tax expense of approximately $0.7 million related to our Leasing Segment and Consumer CLEC Segment. This was primarily driven by pre-tax income in our Consumer CLEC Segment and state tax expense recorded in our Leasing Segment.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We refer to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Funds From Operations (“FFO”) (as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”)) and Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”) in our analysis of our results of operations, which are not required by, or presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). While we believe that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure, we also believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and AFFO are important non-GAAP supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT.
We define “EBITDA” as net income, as defined by GAAP, before interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as EBITDA before (i) stock-based compensation expense, (ii) the impact, which may be recurring in nature, of transaction and integration related costs, costs associated with Windstream’s bankruptcy, costs associated with litigation claims made against us, and costs associated with the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system (collectively, “Transaction Related and Other Costs”), (iii) the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs, (iv) costs incurred as a result of the early repayment of debt, (v) gains or losses on dispositions, (vi) changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and financial instruments, and (vii) other similar or infrequent items (although we may not have had such charges in the periods presented). We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are important supplemental measures to net income because they provide additional information to evaluate our operating performance on an unleveraged basis. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA is calculated similar to defined terms in our material debt agreements used to determine compliance with specific financial covenants. Since EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, they should not be considered as alternatives to net income determined in accordance with GAAP.
51
Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires the recognition of depreciation expense except on land, such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that uses historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs that excludes historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP. FFO is defined by NAREIT as net income attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. We compute FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition.
The Company defines AFFO as FFO excluding (i) Transaction Related and Other Costs; (ii) Windstream bankruptcy and litigation related expenses; (iii) certain non-cash revenues and expenses such as stock-based compensation expense, amortization of debt and equity discounts, amortization of deferred financing costs, depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets, straight-line revenues, non-cash income taxes, and the amortization of other non-cash revenues to the extent that cash has not been received, such as revenue associated with the amortization of TCIs; and (iv) the impact, which may be recurring in nature, of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, additional costs incurred as a result of early repayment of debt, taxes associated with tax basis cancellation of debt, gains or losses on dispositions, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and financial instruments and similar or infrequent items less maintenance capital expenditures. We believe that the use of FFO and AFFO, and their respective per share amounts, combined with the required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among investors and analysts, and makes comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. We consider FFO and AFFO to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating performance. In particular, we believe AFFO, by excluding certain revenue and expense items, can help investors compare our operating performance between periods and to other REITs on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by unanticipated items and events, such as transaction and integration related costs. The Company uses FFO and AFFO, and their respective per share amounts, only as performance measures, and FFO and AFFO do not purport to be indicative of cash available to fund our future cash requirements. While FFO and AFFO are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of REITs, they do not represent cash flows from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance.
Further, our computations of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to that reported by other REITs or companies that do not define FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition or define EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and AFFO differently than we do.
52
The reconciliation of our net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and of our net income attributable to common shareholders to FFO and AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,908 |
|
|
$ |
16,545 |
|
|
$ |
(8,828 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
405,754 |
|
|
|
451,750 |
|
|
|
434,205 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
390,112 |
|
|
|
319,591 |
|
|
|
305,994 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
|
(38,849 |
) |
EBITDA |
|
$ |
811,437 |
|
|
$ |
782,465 |
|
|
$ |
692,522 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
|
|
7,713 |
|
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
43,708 |
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
|
|
38,005 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(28,995 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(24,219 |
) |
|
|
(5,056 |
) |
|
|
11,284 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
812,739 |
|
|
$ |
802,883 |
|
|
$ |
749,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
8,384 |
|
|
$ |
7,989 |
|
|
$ |
(16,552 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
323,527 |
|
|
|
374,388 |
|
|
|
373,449 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(24,420 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Participating securities' share in earnings |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
Participating securities' share in FFO |
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
(2,594 |
) |
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(5,857 |
) |
|
|
(8,636 |
) |
|
|
(4,420 |
) |
FFO attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
300,937 |
|
|
$ |
373,741 |
|
|
$ |
352,477 |
|
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
43,708 |
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
|
|
38,005 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
(28,463 |
) |
|
|
(3,721 |
) |
|
|
10,736 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount |
|
|
42,779 |
|
|
|
24,614 |
|
|
|
23,102 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
|
|
7,713 |
|
Non-real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
82,227 |
|
|
|
77,362 |
|
|
|
60,756 |
|
Straight-line revenue |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(15,048 |
) |
|
|
(15,136 |
) |
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
(7,992 |
) |
|
|
(5,686 |
) |
|
|
(4,434 |
) |
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
Cash taxes on tax basis cancellation of debt |
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Adjustment to deferred tax valuation allowance and tax rate change |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(36,240 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(34,799 |
) |
|
|
(34,426 |
) |
|
|
(14,871 |
) |
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
AFFO attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
412,458 |
|
|
$ |
443,755 |
|
|
$ |
424,824 |
|
Critical Accounting Estimates
We make certain judgments and use certain estimates and assumptions when applying accounting principles in the preparation of our financial statements. The nature of the estimates and assumptions are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain factors or the susceptibility of such factors to change. We have identified the accounting for income taxes, revenue recognition, useful lives of assets, the impairment of property, plant and equipment, goodwill impairment and business combinations as critical accounting estimates, as they are the most important to our financial statement presentation and require difficult, subjective and complex judgments.
53
We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and, in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Income Taxes
We elected on our initial U.S. federal income tax return to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to shareholders, and meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including asset holding requirements. As a REIT, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax for open taxable years through 2017, on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and we could not deduct dividends paid to our shareholders in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to shareholders. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from reelecting to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.
Subject to the restrictions imposed by the waiver and amendment to our Credit Agreement and the indenture governing our 7.875% senior secured notes due 2025 (as discussed below under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreement”), our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts exceeding 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any capital gains, generally will be restricted. As a result, we may be required to record a provision in our Consolidated Financial Statements for U.S. federal income taxes related to the activities of the REIT and its passthrough subsidiaries for any undistributed income. We are subject to the statutory requirements of the locations in which we conduct business, and state and local income taxes are accrued as deemed required in the best judgment of management based on analysis and interpretation of respective tax laws.
We have elected to treat the subsidiaries through which we operate Uniti Fiber and Talk America, as well as certain portions of Uniti Towers, as TRSs. TRSs enable us to engage in activities that result in income that does not constitute qualifying income for a REIT. Our TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized under the asset and liability method for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates based on currently enacted tax laws, which will be in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period of the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized.
The Company is subject to restrictions on distributions to its shareholders based on our credit agreement as amended. The restrictions permit the Company to make the minimum required distribution to maintain its status as a REIT, which is limited to 90% of our REIT taxable income. The restrictions will remain in place until a plan of reorganization for Windstream has become effective and other conditions related to the Company’s net leverage ratio are satisfied. Management believes that the requirements for a reversion will occur before the end of calendar year 2020. Further, upon reversion, the Company expects to make one or more distributions to its shareholders to ensure that it has distributed at least 100% of its 2020 REIT taxable income. Therefore, the Company believes that the REIT will not incur federal or state income tax related to its 2020 tax year (other than certain local income taxes) and thus no deferred income taxes related to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases at the REIT should be recorded as of December 31, 2019.
We recognize the benefit of tax positions that are "more likely than not" to be sustained upon examination based on their technical merit. The benefit of a tax position is measured at the largest amount that has a greater than 50
54
percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. If applicable, we will report tax-related penalties and interest expense as a component of income tax expense.
The Company will be subject to a federal corporate level tax on any gain recognized from the sale of assets occurring within a five year recognition period after the Spin-Off up to the amount of the built in gain that existed on April 24, 2015, which is based on the fair market value of the assets in excess of the Company’s tax basis as of such date.
Revenue Recognition
Leasing revenues are primarily derived from providing access to or usage of leased networks and facilities. Leasing revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term. Revenues derived from other telecommunications services, including broadband, long distance and enhanced service revenues are recognized monthly as services are provided. Sales of customer premise equipment are recognized when products are delivered to and accepted by customers.
Service revenues are primarily derived from providing broadband transport and backhaul communications services and are recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been provided to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) the collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Services provided to the Company’s customers are pursuant to contractual fee‑based arrangements, which generally provide for recurring fees charged for the use of designated portions of the Company’s network and typically range for a period of three to ten years. The Company’s revenue arrangements often include upfront fees charged to the customer for the cost of establishing the necessary components of the Company’s network prior to the commencement of use by the customer. Fees charged to customers for the recurring use of the Company’s network are recognized during the related periods of service. Upfront fees that are billed in advance of providing services are deferred until such time the customer accepts the Company’s network and then are recognized as service revenues ratably over a period in which substantive services required under the revenue arrangement are expected to be performed, which is the initial term of the arrangement.
Useful Lives of Assets
The calculation of depreciation and amortization expense is based on the estimated economic useful lives of the underlying property, plant and equipment and customer lists, tenant contracts and network intangible assets. Some of our Distribution Systems assets use a group composite depreciation method. Under this method, when a plant is retired, the original cost, net of salvage value, is charged against accumulated depreciation and no immediate gain or loss is recognized on the disposition of the plant.
Rapid changes in technology or changes in market conditions could result in significant changes to the estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment that could materially affect the carrying value of these assets and our future operating results. An extension of the average useful life of our property, plant and equipment of one year would decrease depreciation expense by approximately $27.6 million per year, while a reduction in the average useful life of one year would increase depreciation expense by approximately $22.9 million per year.
At December 31, 2019, our unamortized finite lived intangible assets totaled $531.9 million, and are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives with the exception of the customer list intangible assets related to our Consumer CLEC Business, which were brought over at carry-over basis at the time of the Spin-Off, and are amortized using the sum-of-the-years’-digits method over their estimated useful lives. A reduction in the average useful lives of our finite lived intangible asset of one year would have increased the amount of amortization expense recorded in 2019 by approximately $2.4 million.
Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment
We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amount of our property, plant and equipment may not be recoverable or realized. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability by estimating whether we will recover
55
the carrying value of those assets through its undiscounted future cash flows and the eventual disposition of the asset. If, based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment, we would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the related assets. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses were recognized.
Business Combinations and Asset Acquisitions
We apply the acquisition method of accounting for acquisitions meeting the definition of a business combination or asset acquisition, where assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value at the date of each acquisition, and the results of operations are included with those of the Company from the dates of the respective acquisitions. The fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities are estimated using the income, market and/or cost approach. The income approach utilizes the present value of estimated future cash flows that a business or asset can be expected to generate, while under the market approach, the fair value of an asset or business reflects the price at which comparable assets are purchased under similar circumstances. Inherent in our preparation of cash flow projections are significant assumptions and estimates derived from a review of operating results, business plans, expected growth rates, capital expenditure plans, cost of capital and tax rates. We also make certain forecasts about future economic conditions, interest rates and other market data. Many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management. Small changes in these assumptions or estimates could materially affect the cash flow projections, and therefore could affect the estimated fair value. Impact these assumptions or estimates include customer retention, execution of our business plans, which impact growth, cost escalation impacting margin, the level of capital expenditures required to sustain our growth and market factors, including stock price fluctuations and increased rates, impacting our cost of capital.
For acquisitions meeting the definition of a business combination, any excess of the purchase price paid by the Company over the amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. ASC 805, Business Combinations, also requires acquirers to, among other things, estimate the acquisition date fair value of any contingent consideration and recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. When provisional amounts are initially recorded, the Company continues to evaluate acquisitions for a period not to exceed one year after the applicable acquisition date of each transaction to determine whether any additional adjustments are needed to the allocation of the purchase price paid for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
For acquisitions meeting the definition of an asset acquisition, the fair value of the consideration transferred, including transaction costs, is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. There are significant judgments and estimates used in determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which include assumptions with respect to items such as replacement cost, land value, assemblage factor, discount rate, lease-up period, implied rents per strand mile, and useful life. No goodwill is recognized in an asset acquisition.
Goodwill
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, all of our goodwill is included in our Fiber Infrastructure segment. Goodwill is recognized for the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. In accordance with ASC 350-20, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, we evaluate goodwill for impairment between annual impairment tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Unless circumstances otherwise dictate, the annual impairment test is performed in the fourth quarter. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgment, including: the identification of reporting units; assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units; assignment of goodwill to reporting units. We performed our goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter, and we concluded the implied fair value of our Fiber Infrastructure reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value by less than 2%. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses were recognized.
We estimate the fair value of our reporting units (which are our segments) using a combination of an income approach based on the present value of estimated future cash flows and a market approach based on market data of
56
comparable businesses and acquisition multiples paid in recent transactions. We evaluate the appropriateness of each valuation methodology in determining the weighting applied to each methodology in the determination of the concluded fair value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit's net assets is less than its fair value, no indication of impairment exists. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is greater than the fair value of the reporting unit, an impairment loss must be recognized for the excess and recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.
Inherent in our preparation of cash flow projections are significant assumptions and estimates derived from a review of our operating results and business plans, which includes expected revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditure plans and cost of capital. In determining these assumptions, we consider our ability to execute on our plans, future economic conditions, interest rates and other market data. Many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, and these assumptions and estimates may change in future periods. As our concluded fair value of our Fiber Infrastructure reporting unit slightly exceeds carrying value, small changes in these assumptions or estimates could materially affect our cash flow projections, and therefore could affect the likelihood and amount of potential impairment in future periods. Potential events that could negatively impact these assumptions or estimates may include customer losses or poor execution of our business plans, which impact revenue growth, cost escalation impacting margin, the level of capital expenditures required to sustain our growth and market factors, including stock price fluctuations and increased rates, impacting our cost of capital. For example, if we were to experience a significant delay in our permitting process in the construction of our fiber networks, the timing of effected cash flows could impact long term growth rates and negatively impact the income approach, leading to potential impairment. As a result, should our expectations of average projected revenue growth percentage decrease by 4.0%, average projected EBITDA margin percentage decrease by 1.2% and/or average projected capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue increase by 3.9%, we may experience future impairment to goodwill (while other assumptions remain constant). Should we experience a deterioration in market factors such as stock prices or increased interest rates, a cost of capital increase in excess of 1.3% may result in future impairment. The market approach uses market data of comparable business and acquisition multiples paid in recent transactions to estimate fair value. Declines in acquisitions multiples of approximately 1.8% could affect the likelihood and amount of potential impairment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal liquidity needs are to fund operating expenses, meet debt service requirements, fund investment activities (including capital expenditures), and make dividend distributions. Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities (primarily arising under the Master Lease with Windstream), borrowings under our credit agreement by and among the Operating Partnership, CSL Capital, LLC and Uniti Group Finance Inc., the guarantors and lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Credit Agreement”), and proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities.
As of December 31, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $142.8 million. Availability under our Revolving Credit Facility is subject to various conditions, including a maximum secured leverage ratio of 5.0:1. Following the effectiveness of the Sixth Amendment to our Credit Agreement, the Revolving Credit Facility is now fully drawn. However, we have subsequently repaid a portion of the amount outstanding and as of the date of this Annual Report we have approximately $40 million of available capacity. In addition, if we incur debt under our Revolving Credit Facility or otherwise such that our total leverage ratio exceeds 6.5:1, our debt instruments would impose significant restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $617.0 million, $472.8 million and $405.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities is primarily attributable to our leasing activities.
Cash used in investing activities was $544.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which was driven by capital expenditures ($350.5 million) and the acquisition of Bluebird fiber network assets ($320.8 million), partially offset by proceeds related to the sale of Uniti Towers’ Latin American and ground lease businesses and sale of Uniti Fiber’s Midwest operations ($136.8 million). Cash used in investing activities was $480.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was driven by capital expenditures ($423.6 million), primarily related to our Uniti
57
Fiber and Uniti Leasing businesses, and the acquisition of ITS ($53.7 million). Cash used in investing activities was $1.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017, which was driven by the acquisitions of Southern Light ($636.1 million), Hunt ($126.0 million), NMS assets ($69.7 million), ground lease investments ($21.8 million), partially offset by a Tower Cloud working capital adjustment ($0.2 million) and capital expenditures ($166.0 million), primarily related to our Uniti Fiber and Uniti Towers businesses.
Cash provided by financing activities was $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which primarily represents the proceeds from issuance of notes ($345.0 million), proceeds from sale of the Warrants ($50.8 million) and net proceeds under our ATM Program ($21.6 million). This was mostly offset by dividend payments ($138.7 million), payment for bond hedge option ($70.0 million), net repayments under the Revolving Credit Facility ($65.0 million), payments for financing costs ($49.5 million), contingent consideration payments ($32.3 million), principal payments related to the senior secured term loan ($21.1 million) and distributions paid to noncontrolling interests ($3.0 million). Cash used in financing activities was $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was driven by dividend payments ($426.1 million), principal payments on our senior secured term loan ($21.1 million), contingent consideration payments ($18.6 million), distributions to noncontrolling interest ($9.9 million), partially offset by net borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility ($360.0 million) and net proceeds under our ATM Program ($109.4 million). Cash provided by financing activities was $502.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, which primarily represents the net proceeds from the sale of common stock through a public offering ($498.9 million) and proceeds from the 2024 Notes issued in May 2017 ($201.0 million), which were used to fund the acquisitions of Southern Light and Hunt, and net borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility ($280.0 million), partially offset by dividend payments ($400.2 million), deferred financing costs related to the term loan repricing and 2024 Notes issued in May 2017 ($28.5 million), contingent consideration payments ($20.0 million), and principal payments related to the senior secured term loan ($21.1 million).
Windstream Master Lease
A substantial portion of our leasing revenue and cash flow from operations is derived from the Master Lease with Windstream. The Master Lease has an initial term of 15 years which, at the option of Windstream, may be extended for up to four renewal terms of five years each beyond the initial term. In addition, Windstream has the right to extend the initial term from 15 years to 20 years and, if exercised, the number of renewal terms will be reduced to three so that the maximum term (taking into account all renewals) is 35 years. Commencing with the fourth year, the rent is subject to annual escalation of 0.5%, and cash rents recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $655.7 million. The rent for the first year of each renewal term will be an amount agreed to by us and Windstream, or if we are unable to agree, the renewal rent will be determined by an independent appraisal process. Commencing with the second year of each renewal term, the renewal rent will increase at an escalation rate of 0.5%. In addition, if we fund any capital improvements requested by Windstream, the rent will be increased to account for such funding.
On February 15, 2019, the federal court judge issued a ruling against Windstream, finding that its attempts to waive such default were not valid; that an “event of default” occurred with respect to such debt securities; and that the holder’s acceleration of such debt in December 2017 was effective. In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as a “debtor in possession” under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court. See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” for additional information concerning the impact Windstream’s bankruptcy may have on our operations and financial conditions. See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” for additional information concerning the impact Windstream’s bankruptcy may have on our operations and financial conditions.
On July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in an adversary proceeding against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, that certain rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and that Uniti breached certain of its obligations under the Master Lease. As further described below, an adverse determination in the adversary proceeding with Windstream could materially adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition and our status as a REIT.
58
Rejection. In bankruptcy, Windstream has the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. Because the Master Lease is a single indivisible Master Lease with a single rent payment, it must be assumed or rejected in whole and cannot be sub-divided by facility or market. A significant amount of Windstream’s revenue is generated from the use of our network included in the Master Lease, and we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations. Furthermore, Windstream is designated as a “carrier of last resort” in certain markets where it utilizes the Master Lease to provide service to its customers, and we believe Windstream would require approval from the applicable PUC and the FCC to cease providing service in those markets. As a result, although we can provide no assurances, we believe the probability of Windstream rejecting the Master Lease in bankruptcy to be remote. A rejection of the Master Lease, or even a temporary disruption in payments to us, would require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties and avoid the imposition of liens on our properties and could impact our ability to fund other cash obligations, including dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, non-essential capital expenditures and our debt service obligations and could otherwise affect our ability to maintain REIT status.
A rejection of the Master Lease by Windstream could result in an “event of default” under our Credit Agreement if we are unable to enter into a replacement lease that satisfies certain criteria set forth in the Credit Agreement within ninety (90) calendar days and we do not maintain pro forma compliance with a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of 5.00 to 1.00. An acceleration of debt under our senior secured credit facilities due to an uncured “event of default” under our Credit Agreement would also result in an “event of default” under the terms of our outstanding notes. Such an “event of default” would give the holders of the applicable debt obligation the right to accelerate our repayment obligations relating to such debt.
Our Credit Agreement prohibits us from amending the Master Lease in a manner that, among other provisions, pro forma for any such amendment, would result in our consolidated secured leverage ratio exceeding 5.00 to 1.00, and management has no intention to enter into a lease amendment that would violate our debt covenants. However, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring, including as a result of the adversary proceeding brought by Windstream related to the Master Lease if the Settlement is not implemented.
Recharacterization / Pending Master Lease Litigation. On July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging¸ among other things, that (1) the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, (2) rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, (3) the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and (4) Uniti has breached its non-competition obligations to Windstream under the Master Lease, each of which allegations is discussed in more detail below. As described above, the trial for the recharacterization claim has been stayed. Any adverse determination or judicial decision on one or more of the claims against us could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition or, in certain circumstances, cause us to file for voluntary Chapter 11 protection. See “Legal Proceedings.”
Mediation. Uniti, Windstream and Windstream’s creditors have been engaged in mediation in the Windstream bankruptcy to resolve claims brought by Windstream against Uniti. We have recently announced an agreement in principle to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement. See “Item 1. Business.—Recent Developments.” If the settlement is effectuated, we will need to raise significant additional capital to fund our obligations under such settlement.
At-the-Market Common Stock Offering Program
We have established an at the market common stock offering program (the “ATM Program”) to sell shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $250 million. The ATM Program is currently suspended following the June 15, 2019 expiration of our shelf registration statement. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has issued and sold an aggregate of 6.7 million shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $19.92 per share under the ATM Program, receiving net proceeds of $131.2 million, after commissions of $1.7 million and
59
other offering costs. As of December 31, 2019, we have approximately $117.1 million available for issuance under the ATM Program. When in operation, this program was intended to provide additional financial flexibility and an alternative mechanism to access the capital markets at an efficient cost as and when we need financing, including for acquisitions.
UPREIT Operating Partnership Units
During 2017, the Company completed its reorganization (the “up-REIT Reorganization”) to operate through a customary “up-REIT” structure. Under this structure, the Operating Partnership now holds substantially all of the Company’s assets and is the direct or indirect parent company of, among others, CSL Capital, LLC, Uniti Group Finance Inc. and Uniti Fiber Holdings Inc.
Our UPREIT structure, enables us to acquire properties by issuing to sellers, as a form of consideration, limited partnership interests in our operating partnership, (commonly called “OP Units”). The limited partner equity interests in the Operating Partnership are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for shares of our common stock or, at our election, cash of equivalent value. We believe that this structure will facilitate our ability to acquire individual properties and portfolios of properties by enabling us to structure transactions which will defer taxes payable by a seller while preserving our available cash for other purposes, including the possible payment of dividends. We issued limited partnership interests as part of the acquisition consideration for the acquisitions of Hunt and Southern Light in 2017.
Senior Notes
At December 31, 2019, the Operating Partnership and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries had outstanding $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Senior Secured Notes due April 15, 2023 (the “2023 Secured Notes”), $1.11 billion aggregate principal amount of 8.25% Senior Notes due October 15, 2023 (the “2023 Notes”) and $600 million aggregate principal amount of 7.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due December 15, 2024 (the “2024 Notes,” and together with the 2023 Notes, the “Unsecured Notes”).
On February 10, 2020, the Operating Partnership and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries issued $2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due February 15, 2025 (the “2025 Secured Notes” and, together with and the 2023 Secured Notes, the “Secured Notes;” the Secured Notes and the Unsecured Notes are collectively referred to as the “Notes”). The proceeds were used to repay outstanding term loans under our senior secured credit facilities as discussed in “Credit Agreement” below.
In connection with the up-REIT Reorganization, the Operating Partnership replaced the Company and assumed its obligations as an obligor under the 2023 Secured Notes, 2023 Notes and the 2024 Notes and Facilities. The Company subsequently became a guarantor of these series of notes and under the Credit Agreement. The Company also guarantees the Exchangeable Notes and the 2025 Secured Notes. Separate financial statements of the Operating Partnership have not been included since the Operating Partnership is not a registrant.
Exchangeable Notes
On June 28, 2019, Uniti Fiber issued $345 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% Exchangeable Senior Notes due June 15, 2024. The Exchangeable Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2019. The Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof, at Uniti Fiber’s election.
Credit Agreement
Uniti Group LP, Uniti Group Finance 2019 Inc. and CSL Capital, LLC (the “Borrowers”) are party to the Credit Agreement, which as of December 31, 2019, provided for the Term Loan Facility (in an initial principal amount of $2.14 billion) and the Revolving Credit Facility (in an aggregate principal amount of up to $750 million). On February 10, 2020, in connection with the issuance of the 2025 Secured Notes and the effectiveness of the Sixth Amendment, the Borrowers repaid all $2.05 billion of outstanding term loans and repaid approximately $156.7 million of revolving
60
loans (and terminated related commitments in an amount equal to $157.6 million). All obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by (i) the Company and (ii) certain of the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) and are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers and the Subsidiary Guarantors, which assets also secure the Secured Notes.
The Revolving Credit Facility presently bears interest at a rate equal to either a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.25% or a eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 4.75% to 5.25%, in each case, calculated in a customary manner and determined based on our consolidated secured leverage ratio.
The Borrowers are subject to customary covenants under the Credit Agreement, including an obligation to maintain a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, not to exceed 5.00 to 1.00. We are permitted, subject to customary conditions, to incur other indebtedness, so long as, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such indebtedness, our consolidated total leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, does not exceed 6.50 to 1.00 and, if such debt is secured, our consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, does not exceed 4.00 to 1.00. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision whereby the failure of the Borrowers or certain of their subsidiaries to make payments under other debt obligations, or the occurrence of certain events affecting those other borrowing arrangements, could trigger an obligation to repay any amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement. In particular, a repayment obligation could be triggered if (i) the Borrowers or certain of their subsidiaries fail to make a payment when due of any principal or interest on any other indebtedness aggregating $75.0 million or more, or (ii) an event occurs that causes, or would permit the holders of any other indebtedness aggregating $75.0 million or more to cause, such indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity. As of December 31, 2019, the Borrowers were in compliance with all of the covenants under the Credit Agreement. However, we would be in breach of the requirement to deliver audited financial statements without a going concern opinion if we are unable to provide 2019 audited financial statements without a going concern opinion to lenders under our Credit Agreement by March 30, 2020.
On March 18, 2019, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2018 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the fourth amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to our Credit Agreement. During the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy, the Fourth Amendment generally limits our ability under the Credit Agreement to (i) prepay unsecured indebtedness and (ii) pay cash dividends in excess of 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains.
On February 10, 2020, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2019 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the Sixth Amendment to our Credit Agreement. In addition to the restrictions imposed by the Fourth Amendment discussed above, which remain effective, the Sixth Amendment also limits the ability of our non-guarantor subsidiaries to incur indebtedness. The Sixth Amendment increased the interest rate on our revolving facility by 100 bps for each applicable rate. As amended, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.25% or a eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 4.75% to 5.25%, in each case, calculated in a customary manner and determined based on our consolidated secured leverage ratio.
Interest Rate Swaps
We are party to interest rate swap agreements to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in our variable rate Term Loan Facility. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and have a notional value of $2.04 billion and mature on October 24, 2022. The weighted average fixed rate paid is 2.105%, and the variable rate received resets monthly to the one-month LIBOR subject to a minimum rate of 1.0%.
As result of the repayment of the Company’s term loan facility in February of 2020 (discussed above), the Company entered into receive-fixed interest rate swaps (the “Replacement Swaps”) to offset its existing pay-fixed interest rate swaps (the “Existing Swaps”) that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments initially associated with the term loan facility. On February 10, 2020, the Company discontinued hedge accounting on its Existing Swaps as
61
the hedge accounting requirements were no longer met. Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income associated with the Existing Swaps as of the date of dedesignation, will be reclassified to interest expense as the hedged interest payments impact earnings. The net effect of these offsetting interest rate swaps will result in a monthly cash outflow of approximately $1.1 million through October 2022.
Outlook
We anticipate continuing to invest in our network infrastructure across our Uniti Leasing, Uniti Fiber and Uniti Towers portfolios. We anticipate declaring dividends for the 2020 tax year to comply with our REIT distribution requirements. We anticipate that we will partially finance these needs, as well as operating expenses (including our debt service obligations), from our cash on hand and cash flows provided by operating activities. We have no material remaining revolving credit facility capacity and therefore we may need to access the capital markets to generate additional funds in an amount sufficient to fund our business operations, announced investment activities, capital expenditures, debt service and distributions to our shareholders. We are closely monitoring the equity and debt markets and will seek to access them again promptly when we determine market conditions are appropriate. Our debt covenants currently do not permit us to incur material additional debt. We will need to raise additional capital if our settlement, which includes growth capital investments, with Windstream is effectuated.
The amount, nature and timing of any capital markets transactions will depend on: our operating performance and other circumstances, including uncertainty surrounding Windstream; our then-current commitments and obligations; the amount, nature and timing of our capital requirements; any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements; and overall market conditions. These expectations are forward-looking and subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions. If our expectations about our liquidity prove to be incorrect or we are unable to access the capital markets as we anticipate, we would be subject to a shortfall in liquidity in the future which could lead to a reduction in our capital expenditures and/or dividends and, in an extreme case, our ability to pay our debt service obligations. If this shortfall occurs rapidly and with little or no notice, it could limit our ability to address the shortfall on a timely basis.
In addition to exploring potential capital markets transactions, the Company regularly evaluates market conditions, its liquidity profile, and various financing alternatives for opportunities to enhance its capital structure. If opportunities are favorable, the Company may refinance or repurchase existing debt. However, there can be no assurances that any debt refinancing would be on similar or more favorable terms than our existing arrangements. This would include the risk that interest rates could increase and/or there may be changes to our existing covenants.
In light of recent developments and uncertainty surrounding Windstream and the effect of substantial doubt about our ability to continue a going concern, each as set forth under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, until such time as our settlement is approved and Windstream emerges from bankruptcy, we may take additional measures to conserve cash if we anticipate that it may be difficult for us to access the capital markets at attractive rates until such uncertainty is clarified. Accordingly, we may elect to suspend, delay or reduce success-based capital expenditures and dividend payments to conserve cash. If our assumptions are incorrect, we could need additional sources of liquidity to fund our cash needs and cannot assure that we will obtain them. Because our Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations, we expect that any disruption in payments by Windstream would be limited, and we believe that if we take such actions and such disruption is only limited, we would have enough liquidity to fund our cash needs within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. If our assumptions are incorrect or any disruption is longer, we could need additional sources of liquidity to fund our cash needs and cannot assure that we will obtain them.
62
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2019, we had contractual obligations and commitments as follows:
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(millions) |
Less than 1 Year |
|
|
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
|
|
More than 5 Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
Long-term debt(a) |
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,599 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,605 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations(b) |
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Operating leases |
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Finance leases |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Network deployment(c) |
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Committed landlord growth funding |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration(d) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Total projected obligations and commitments(e) |
$ |
424 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,243 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
6,707 |
|
(a) |
Excludes $207.1 million of unamortized discounts on long-term debt and deferred financing costs. |
(b) |
Interest rates on our Term Loan Facility are based on our swap rates. Excludes the impact to the fourth amendment to our Credit Agreement discussed above in “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Agreement”. |
(c) |
Network deployment purchase commitments are for success-based projects for which we have a signed customer contract before we commit resources to expand our network. |
(d) |
Cash settled contingent consideration related to the August 31, 2016 acquisition of Tower Cloud, Inc. |
(e) |
Excludes $23.7 million of derivative liability related to interest rate swaps maturing on October 24, 2022. |
If the Settlement is approved, we could incur significant additional contractual obligations. See “Item 1. Business.—Recent Developments.”
Dividends
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. In order to maintain our REIT status, we intend to make dividend payments of all or substantially all of our taxable income to holders of our common stock out of assets legally available for this purpose, if and to the extent authorized by our board of directors. Before we make any dividend payments, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating requirements and debt service obligations. If our cash available for distribution is less than our taxable income, we could be required to sell assets or borrow funds to make cash dividends or we may make a portion of the required dividend in the form of a taxable distribution of stock or debt securities.
The following table below sets out details regarding our cash dividends on our common stock:
Period |
|
Payment Date |
|
Cash Dividend Per Share |
|
|
Record Date |
|
October 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 |
|
January 15, 2019 |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
January 1, 2019 - March 31, 2019 |
|
April 15, 2019 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
April 1, 2019 |
April 1, 2019 - June 30, 2019 |
|
July 15, 2019 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
June 28, 2019 |
July 1, 2019 - September 30, 2019 |
|
October 15, 2019 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
September 30, 2019 |
October 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 |
|
January 15, 2020 |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
63
Any dividends must be declared by our Board of Directors, which will take into account various factors including our current and anticipated operating results, our financial position, REIT requirements, conditions prevailing in the market, restrictions in our debt documents and additional factors they deem appropriate. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to pay dividends or to change the amount paid as dividends. In light of recent developments with Windstream, we may take further measures to conserve cash, which may include a suspension, delay or reduction in our dividend. In addition, during the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy, the Fourth Amendment to our Credit Agreement (as set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors) and our 7.875% senior secured notes due 2025 generally limit our ability to pay cash dividends in excess of 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures for the Distribution Systems leased under the Master Lease are generally the responsibility of Windstream. The Master Lease stipulates that Windstream can request that we fund $50 million of capital expenditures per year for five years (but in no event to extend beyond the end of the sixth year of the Master Lease, which ends May 2021); however, Windstream cannot require Uniti to make such capital expenditures. If we elect to fund requested capital expenditures, the annual lease payments will be increased at a floating rate based on our cost of capital. No capital expenditure funding requests were made by Windstream for the year ended December 31, 2019.
If the settlement with Windstream is approved and implemented, we will fund an aggregate of $1.75 billion of Growth Capital Investment in property subject to the Master Lease over the next 10 years. Pursuant to the Settlement, if Windstream is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Leases, Uniti will not be required to fund Growth Capital Improvements. In the event Uniti defaults or otherwise fails to timely satisfy its obligations under the New Leases and Windstream is in compliance with the terms of the New Leases, then Windstream has the right to deduct from the subsequent rent payment or payments, amounts otherwise owed to Windstream.
We categorize our capital expenditures as either (i) success-based, (ii) maintenance, (iii) integration or (iv) corporate and non-network. We define success-based capital expenditures as those related to installing existing or anticipated contractual customer service orders. Maintenance capital expenditures are those necessary to keep existing network elements fully operational. Integration capital expenditures are those made specifically with respect to recent acquisitions that are essential to integrating acquired companies in our business. We anticipate continuing to invest in our network infrastructure across our Uniti Leasing, Uniti Fiber and Uniti Towers portfolios, and expect that cash on hand, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility, and cash flows provided by operating activities will be sufficient to support these investments. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has committed to fund approximately $11.2 million of growth capital expenditures related to the Bluebird Lease over the next twelve months.
In light of recent developments with Windstream, we may take further measures to conserve cash, which may include a suspension, delay or reduction in success-based capital expenditures. We are closely monitoring developments of the Windstream bankruptcy and continually assess our capital expenditure plans in light of such developments.
Off Balance-Sheet Arrangements
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
In fiscal 2019, our primary market risk exposure was interest rate risk with respect to our variable rate indebtedness under our Term Loan Facility. In addition, we have a variable rate Revolving Credit Facility, which had an aggregate principal amount of $575 million as of December 31, 2019. To manage this exposure under our Term Loan Facility, we
64
have entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in our variable rate Term Loan Facility. As result of the repayment of the Company’s term loan facility in February of 2020 (discussed above), the Company entered into receive-fixed interest rate swaps (the “Replacement Swaps”) to offset its existing pay-fixed interest rate swaps (the “Existing Swaps”) that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments initially associated with the term loan facility. On February 10, 2020, the Company discontinued hedge accounting on its Existing Swaps as the hedge accounting requirements were no longer met. Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income associated with the Existing Swaps as of the date of dedesignation, will be reclassified to interest expense as the hedged interest payments impact earnings. The net effect of these offsetting interest rate swaps will result in a monthly cash outflow of approximately $1.1 million through October 2022. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rate risk for our Term Loan Facility has been mitigated through this interest rate swap agreement, and, with the exception of our Revolving Credit Facility, the interest rate for our remaining debt has a fixed rate. A hypothetical 10% change in interest rates effective at December 31, 2019, would have had a $3.4 million impact on Uniti’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
An increase in interest rates could make the financing of any acquisition by us more costly. Rising interest rates could also limit our ability to refinance our debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increase interest expense on refinanced indebtedness.
In connection with the Sixth Amendment to our Credit Agreement obtained on February 10, 2020, the applicable margins for (i) base rate loans under the Revolving Credit Facility increased to a range of 3.75% to 4.25% and (ii) eurodollar rate loans under the Revolving Credit Facility to a range of 4.75% to 5.25%, calculated in a customary manner and determined based on our consolidated secured leverage ratio.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuation
Subsequent to the sale of our Latin American tower portfolio on April 2, 2019, we no longer have operations denominated in foreign currencies. Less than 1% of our revenues were denominated in foreign currencies for the year ended December 31, 2019. Cost of sales and operating costs related to these sales are largely denominated in the same respective currencies, thereby partially limiting our transaction risk exposure. A hypothetical uniform 10% strengthening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the currencies in which our transactions were denominated would have resulted in an immaterial change in net income for the year ended December 31, 2019.
65
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Uniti Group Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
Page |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
Uniti Group Inc. |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
66
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Uniti Group Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Uniti Group Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income (loss), of shareholders’ deficit and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO because a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting existed as of that date related to ineffective controls over the identification and valuation of certain assets in the application of the acquisition method of accounting for asset acquisitions.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness referred to above is described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered this material weakness in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2019 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s most significant customer, Windstream Holdings, Inc., which accounts for approximately 65.0% of consolidated total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and uncertainties surrounding potential impacts to the Company resulting from Windstream Holdings, Inc.’s bankruptcy filing raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in management’s report referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the
67
Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment – Fiber Infrastructure Segment (the “Segment”)
68
As described in Notes 3 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $691 million as of December 31, 2019, all of which is associated with the Fiber Infrastructure segment. Management reviews goodwill for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter, and evaluates goodwill for impairment between annual impairment tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of its reporting units (which are management’s segments) below its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the Segment is greater than the Segment’s fair value, an impairment loss must be recognized for the excess and recorded on the consolidated statements of income. Management estimates fair value using a combination of an income approach based on the present value of estimated future cash flows of the Segment and a market approach based on market data of comparable businesses and acquisition multiples paid in recent transactions. Management evaluates the appropriateness of each valuation methodology in determining the weighting applied to each methodology in the determination of the concluded fair value. Inherent in the cash flow projections for the Segment are significant assumptions derived from management’s review of its operating results and business plans, including expected revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditure plans and cost of capital.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment of the Fiber Infrastructure segment is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when determining the fair value measurement of the Segment, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in performing procedures to evaluate management’s valuation of the Segment. There was significant audit effort to evaluate the audit evidence related to management’s fair value estimate determined using a combination of an income approach and a market approach, including the weighting applied to each methodology, as well as significant assumptions used in the income approach such as revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditure plans and cost of capital, and comparable businesses and acquisition multiples utilized in the market approach. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the valuation of the Segment. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for determining the fair value estimate, including (i) evaluating the fair value of the Segment as determined using a combination of an income approach and a market approach, including the weighting applied to each methodology; (ii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the discounted cash flow model and market approach; (iii) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management in the income approach, including the revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditure plans and cost of capital; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of comparable businesses and acquisition multiples utilized in the market approach. Evaluating management’s assumptions used in the income approach involved evaluating whether the assumptions were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the Segment, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Evaluating the reasonableness of comparable businesses and acquisition multiples utilized in the market approach involved considering the consistency with external market data and recent transactions. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the fair value of the Segment as determined using a combination of an income approach and a market approach, including the weighting applied to each methodology, the appropriateness of management’s discounted cash flow model and the reasonableness of certain significant assumptions used by management in the income approach, including the revenue growth rates and cost of capital, and the reasonableness of the comparable businesses and acquisition multiples utilized in the market approach.
Purchase Price Allocation - Bluebird Network Acquisition
As described in Notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the asset acquisition of Bluebird Network, LLC’ (“Bluebird Network”) on August 30, 2019 for total purchase consideration of $320.8 million. Management applies the acquisition method of accounting for acquisitions meeting the definition of an asset acquisition, where assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value at the date of the acquisition. Management uses significant judgment and estimates in determining the fair values of the assets acquired and
69
liabilities assumed, which include assumptions with respect to items such as replacement cost, land value, assemblage factor, discount rate, lease-up period, implied rents per strand mile, and useful life.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the purchase price allocation of the Bluebird Network acquisition is a critical audit matter are (i) there was a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to the fair value estimate of tangible and intangible assets acquired due to the significant amount of judgment by management when developing the estimate; (ii) there was significant audit effort in evaluating the significant assumptions relating to the fair value estimate, including the replacement cost, land value, assemblage factor, discount rate, lease-up period, implied rents per strand mile, and useful life; (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained; and (iv) as described in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, a material weakness was identified related to this matter.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, (i) reading the purchase agreement; (ii) testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets; (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the fair value estimates; and (iv) evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methods and the reasonableness of significant assumptions, including the replacement cost, land value, assemblage factor, discount rate, lease-up period, implied rents per strand mile, and useful life, using professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in doing so. Evaluating the reasonableness of the replacement cost assumption involved considering the historical cost of constructing fiber network. The land value, assemblage factor, discount rate, lease-up period, and implied rents per strand mile assumptions were evaluated by considering the consistency with external market and industry data. The estimate of useful life was evaluated by considering whether the assumption was consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Little Rock, Arkansas
March 12, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
70
Uniti Group Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Thousands, except par value) |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-line revenue receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative asset |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders' Deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and other debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, $ |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total Uniti shareholders' deficit |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Noncontrolling interests - operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders' deficit |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock, and Shareholders' Deficit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
71
Uniti Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tower |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense (exclusive of depreciation, accretion and amortization) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Participating securities' share in earnings |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share (Note 13): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
72
Uniti Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative contracts |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in foreign currency translation |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
73
Uniti Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
|
Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
Total Shareholders' Deficit |
|
|||||||||||||||
(Thousands, except share data) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
2017 Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Convertible preferred stock dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Equity issuance cost |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net share settlement |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
2018 Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment for adoption of new accounting standard |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At-the-market issuance of common stock, net of offering costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Convertible preferred stock dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net share settlement |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
74
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
2019 Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment for adoption of new accounting standard |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At-the-market issuance of common stock, net of offering costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock dividends declared ($ |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Exchange of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Convertible preferred stock dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Equity settlement convertible preferred stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net share settlement |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity settlement contingent consideration |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock - employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component value of exchangeable note issuance, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability related to exchangeable note issuance |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Sale of common stock warrant |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for bond hedge option |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at December 31, 2019 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
75
Uniti Group Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Straight-line rental revenues |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loss on sale of Uniti Fiber Midwest operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loss on asset disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue from prepaid rent - Bluebird/Uniti Fiber Midwest networks (Note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Bluebird asset acquisition |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from sale of Uniti Fiber Midwest operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Acquisition of ground lease investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
NMS asset acquisition (Note 5) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Capital expenditures - other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payment on debt |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Payments of contingent consideration |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under revolving credit facility |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Finance lease payments |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Payments for financing costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock issuance, net of costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Payment for bond hedge option |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net share settlement |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired but not yet paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Tenant capital improvements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Settlement of convertible preferred stock, Series A Shares |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Settlement of contingent consideration through non-cash consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Exchange of noncontrolling interest through non-cash consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses through non-cash consideration |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
77
Uniti Group Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization and Description of Business
Uniti Group Inc. (the “Company,” “Uniti,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated in the state of Maryland on September 4, 2014. We are an independent, internally managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) engaged in the acquisition and construction of mission critical infrastructure in the communications industry. We are principally focused on acquiring and constructing fiber optic broadband networks, wireless communications towers, copper and coaxial broadband networks and data centers. We manage our operations in
The Company operates through a customary “up-REIT” structure, pursuant to which we hold substantially all of our assets through a partnership, Uniti Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), that we control as general partner, with the only significant difference between the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries compared to the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations of Uniti is that the results for the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries do not include Uniti’s Consumer CLEC segment, which consists of Talk America Services. The up-REIT structure is intended to facilitate future acquisition opportunities by providing the Company with the ability to use common units of the Operating Partnership as a tax-efficient acquisition currency. As of December 31, 2019, we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and own approximately
Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include all accounts of the Company and, its wholly-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which includes the Operating Partnership. Under the Accounting Standards Codification 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”), the Operating Partnership is considered a variable interest entity and is consolidated in the Consolidated Financial Statements of Uniti Group Inc. as the Company has determined to be the primary beneficiary. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
ASC 810 provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIEs. Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either: (1) the equity investors (if any) lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and substantially all of the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest. The Company consolidates VIEs in which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined by the entity having both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that, when taken together, most significantly impact the VIE’s performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the VIE that would be significant to the VIE.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for financial information set forth in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), as published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), and with the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Going Concern
In accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), the Company’s management has evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are issued.
78
We are party to a master lease agreement (the “Master Lease”) with Windstream Holdings, Inc. (“Windstream Holdings” and together with its consolidated subsidiaries “Windstream”), from which
Prior to its bankruptcy filing described below, Windstream was involved in litigation with an entity who acquired certain Windstream debt securities and thereafter issued a notice of default as to such securities relating to the Spin- Off. Windstream challenged the matter in federal court and a trial was held in July 2018. On February 15, 2019, the federal court judge issued a ruling against Windstream, finding that its attempts to waive such default were not valid; that an ‘‘event of default’’ occurred with respect to such debt securities; and that the holder’s acceleration of such debt in December 2017 was effective. In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and is currently operating as a ‘‘debtor in possession’’ under supervision of the Bankruptcy Court.
In bankruptcy, Windstream has the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. Because the Master Lease is a single indivisible Master Lease with a single rent payment, it must be assumed or rejected in whole and cannot be sub-divided by facility or market absent Uniti’s consent. A significant amount of Windstream’s revenue is generated from the use of our network included in the Master Lease, and we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations. Furthermore, Windstream is designated as a “carrier of last resort” in certain markets where it utilizes the Master Lease to provide service to its customers, and Windstream would require approval from the Public Utility Commissions (“PUC”) and the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to cease providing service in those markets. As a result, we believe the probability of Windstream rejecting the Master Lease in bankruptcy to be remote. Windstream has filed claims against us alleging, among other things: that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing transaction, which would impact its treatment in Windstream’s bankruptcy (including potentially through changing our status to that of a creditor that would share in creditor recoveries from the estate rather than receive rent payments) and which could affect our status as a REIT; that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property; and that rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers. A rejection of the Master Lease, an adverse determination by a judge on Windstream’s claims against us, or even a temporary disruption in payments to us, may require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, and could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, including our ability to service debt, comply with debt covenants and maintain our status as a REIT. We participated in mediation of these claims in Windstream’s bankruptcy. On March 2, 2020, Uniti and Windstream jointly announced that they have reached an agreement in principle to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s Bankruptcy. See Note 22.
The Company has considered the mitigating effects of management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern in the event there is a disruption in the payments due to us under the Master Lease prior to Windstream’s assumption or rejection of the lease, or in the event the settlement is not effectuated, and Windstream rejects the lease or if there is any adverse determinations in respect of Windstream’s claims. Those plans include deferring, reducing or delaying cash dividends and capital expenditures, if necessary, paying one or more dividends that are required to maintain our REIT status in shares to the extent allowed under the IRS REIT rules, curtailing acquisition activities, accessing the capital markets and identifying alternative sources of liquidity. Based on our analysis, including consideration of the assurances Windstream has made with respect to the payment of rent, we believe that we have adequate liquidity to continue to fund our operations for twelve months after the issuance of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements absent any adverse determination in respect to Windstream’s claims or disruptions in rent payments under the Master Lease.
Although management has concluded the probability of a rejection of the Master Lease to be remote (were our settlement to be rejected), and has noted the absence of any provision in the Master Lease that contemplates renegotiation of the lease and the lack of any ability of the bankruptcy court to unilaterally reset the rent or terms of the lease, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring, including any judicial
79
decisions in respect of claims against us by Windstream or its creditors. In addition, our Credit Agreement prohibits the Company from amending the Master Lease in a manner that, among other provisions, pro forma for any such amendment, would result in a consolidated secured leverage ratio that exceeds
On March 2, 2020, Uniti and Windstream jointly announced that the mediation has culminated in an agreement in principle (the “Settlement”) to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. See Note 22. In connection with the Settlement, among other provisions, Windstream and Uniti have agreed to bifurcate the Master Lease into two structurally similar agreements to govern Windstream’s incumbent local exchange carrier (“ILEC”) and competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) facilities, respectively (collectively, the “New Leases”). Parties to the New Leases include Windstream Holdings, Inc., Windstream Services, LLC, and its other relevant subsidiaries. The New Leases will be cross-guaranteed and cross-defaulted unless Windstream ceases to be the tenant, and the initial aggregate annual rent under the New Leases will be equal to the annual rent under the Master Lease currently in effect.
The Settlement is subject to negotiation and execution of definitive documentation and certain regulatory approvals and conditions precedent, including bankruptcy court approval and Uniti’s U.S. federal income tax compliance. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation implementing the Settlement. However, if the conditions of the settlement are not satisfied, the litigation would be resumed.
The Company has evaluated its ability to continue as a going concern in light of the Settlement, including the impact of the New Leases on our compliance with our debt covenants, noting that our Credit Agreement would prohibit us from entering into the New Leases that on a pro forma basis, would result in a consolidated secured leverage that exceeds
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and assumptions used in the accompanying financial statements are based upon management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the accompanying financial statements, and such differences could be material.
Property, Plant and Equipment—Property, plant and equipment is stated at original cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The Company capitalizes costs incurred in bringing property, plant and equipment to an operational state, including all activities directly associated with the acquisition, construction, and installation of the related assets it owns. The Company capitalizes a portion of the interest costs it incurs for assets that require a period of time to get them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest that is capitalized is based on the average accumulated expenditures made during the period involved in bringing the assets comprising a network to an operational state at the Company’s weighted average interest rate during the respective accounting period.
The Company also enters into leasing arrangements providing for the long‑term use of constructed fiber that is then integrated into the Company’s network infrastructure. For each lease that qualifies as a finance lease, the present value of the lease payments, which may include both periodic lease payments over the term of the lease as well as
80
upfront payments to the lessor, is capitalized at the inception of the lease and included in property and equipment. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the accumulated amortization of our finance lease assets was $
Certain property, plant and equipment acquired as part of our spin-off from Windstream is depreciated using a group composite depreciation method. Under this method, when property is retired, the original cost, net of salvage value, is charged against accumulated depreciation and
Costs of maintenance and repairs to property, plant and equipment subject triple-net leasing arrangements are the responsibility of our tenant. Costs of maintenance and repairs to property, plant and equipment not subject to triple-net leasing arrangements are expensed as incurred.
We acquire real property interests from third parties who own land where communications infrastructure assets are located and desire to monetize the underlying real property. These real property interests entitle us to receive rental payments from leases on our sites. The financial results of the acquired real property interests are included in the Leasing segment from the date of acquisition and were not material, individually or in the aggregate, to our results of operations. Real property interests are recorded in property, plant and equipment on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Tenant Capital Improvements—Our lease with Windstream provides that tenant funded capital improvements (“TCIs”), defined as maintenance, repair, overbuild, upgrade or replacements to the leased network, including, without limitation, the replacement of copper distribution systems with fiber distribution systems, automatically become property of Uniti upon their construction by Windstream. We receive non-monetary consideration related to the TCIs as they automatically become our property, and we recognize the cost basis of TCIs that are capital in nature as real estate investments and deferred revenue. We depreciate the real estate investments over their estimated useful lives and amortize the deferred revenue as additional leasing revenues over the same depreciable life of the TCI assets. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the net book value of TCIs recorded as a component of property, plant and equipment on our Consolidated Balance Sheet was $
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable from future undiscounted net cash flows we expect the asset group to generate. If the asset group is not fully recoverable, an impairment loss would be recognized for the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and its estimated fair value based on discounted net future cash flows. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, there were no events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amount of any of our assets groups to not be recoverable from future undiscounted net cash flows we expect the asset groups to generate, and
Asset Retirement Obligations—The Company records obligations to perform asset retirement activities, primarily including requirements to remove equipment from leased space or customer sites as required under the terms of the related lease and customer agreements. The fair value of the liability for asset retirement obligations, which represents the net present value of the estimated expected future cash outlay, is recognized in the period in which it is incurred and the fair value of the liability can reasonably be estimated. The liability accretes as a result of the passage of time and related accretion expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as an additional carrying amount of the related long‑lived asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the asset’s useful life. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our aggregate carrying amount of asset retirement obligations totaled $
81
retirement obligations, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we recognized $
Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include all non-restricted cash held at financial institutions and other non-restricted highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—We account for our derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, in which we reflect all derivative instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we record the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedged instruments as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Any ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized within net income. For derivatives that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, changes in fair value are immediately recognized within net income. See Note 7 and Note 9.
Exchangeable Notes and Related Transactions—On June 28, 2019, Uniti Fiber Holdings, Inc. (“Uniti Fiber”), a subsidiary of the Company, issued $
In connection with the offering of the Exchangeable Notes, Uniti Fiber entered into exchangeable note hedge transactions with respect to the Company’s common stock (the “Note Hedge Transactions”) with certain of the Initial Purchasers (as defined in Note 11) or their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Counterparties”). In addition, the Company entered into warrant transactions to sell to the Counterparties warrants (the “Warrants”) to acquire, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, up to approximately
Intangible Assets—Intangible assets are presented in the financial statements at cost less accumulated amortization and are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives with the exception of the customer list intangible assets related to our Consumer CLEC Business, which were brought over at carry-over basis at the time of Spin-Off, and are amortized using the sum-of-the-years’-digits method over their estimated useful lives.
Foreign Currency Translation—The financial statements of our international subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency, and includes the Mexican Peso and Colombian Peso, are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and the weighted average exchange rate for the applicable period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses. Translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of comprehensive income in stockholders’ deficit. On April 2, 2019, the Company ceased transactions involving foreign currencies with the completed sale of the Uniti Towers’ Latin America business (see Note 6), which included our international subsidiaries.
Transaction Related and Other Costs—The Company expenses non-capitalizable transaction related and other costs in the period in which they are incurred and services are received. Transaction related costs include incremental acquisition pursuit, transaction and integration costs, including unsuccessful acquisition pursuit costs. Pursuit and transaction costs include professional services (legal, accounting, advisory, regulatory, etc.), finder’s fees, travel expenses, and other direct expenses associated with an acquisition. Integration costs include direct costs necessary
82
to integrate an acquired business, including professional services, systems and data conversion, severance and retention bonuses payable to employees of an acquired business. In addition, other costs, such as costs incurred as a result of Windstream’s bankruptcy filing, costs associated with Windstream’s claims against us (see Note 15), and costs associated with the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system are included within this line item on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Debt Issuance Costs—The Company recognizes debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The costs, which include underwriting, legal, and other direct costs related to the issuance of debt, are amortized over the contractual term of the debt using the effective interest method.
Revenue Recognition— As discussed in “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” in this Note 3, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASC 842”) on January 1, 2019. Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company recognized leasing revenues on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing leasing income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of the lease term in excess of cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable.
We lease certain assets to Windstream under a triple-net lease, whereby Windstream is responsible for the costs related to operating the Distribution Systems, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair costs. As a result, we do not record an obligation related to the payment of property taxes or insurance, as Windstream makes direct payments to the taxing authorities and insurance carriers, respectively.
The Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“Topic 606”) on January 1, 2018 (see Note 4). Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, the Company recognized service revenues related to its broadband transport and backhaul communications services when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been provided to the customer, (iii) the sales price was fixed or determinable, and (iv) the collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Services provided to the Company’s customers are rendered pursuant to contractual fee‑based arrangements, which generally provide for recurring fees charged for the use of designated portions of the Company’s network and typically range for a period of
We evaluate the collectability of service receivables by considering a variety of factors. The Company typically does not require collateral. When the Company becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, the Company records a specific reserve for bad debt to reduce the related accounts receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes is collectible. When appropriate, the Company also records reserves for bad debts for all other customers based on a variety of factors including the length of time the receivable is past due, the financial health of the customer, macroeconomic considerations and historical experience. If circumstances related to specific customers change, the Company adjusts its estimates of the recoverability of receivables as needed. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the allowance recorded for service receivables was $
Consumer CLEC Business revenues are primarily derived from providing access to or usage of leased networks and facilities and are recognized over the period that the corresponding services are rendered to customers. Revenues derived from other telecommunications services, including broadband, long distance and enhanced service revenues are recognized monthly as services are provided. Sales of customer premise equipment and modems are recognized when products are delivered to and accepted by customers.
Straight-Line Revenue Receivable—The adoption of ASC 842, discussed in “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” in this Note 3, on January 1, 2019 supersedes prior guidance regarding the evaluation of collectability of lease receivables, including straight-line revenue receivables. We have evaluated the collectability of our straight-
83
line revenue receivable associated with the Master Lease in accordance with the transition provisions of ASC 842. At the date of adoption, due to uncertainties surrounding Windstream’s operations and liquidity, including uncertainties surrounding the outcome of Windstream’s pending litigation, we concluded that it was not probable that we would collect all future payments due to the Company over the initial term of the Master Lease. As a result, effective January 1, 2019, the Company recorded the Master Lease on a cash basis in accordance with ASC 842 and will not reflect a straight-line revenue receivable until a time at which collectability of all future rents is determined to be probable. At the adoption of ASC 842, we reflected the write off of the straight-line revenue balance as of January 1, 2019 as a $
Stock-Based Compensation—We account for stock-based compensation using the fair value method of accounting. We have determined that our stock-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services qualify as equity classified awards, which are measured based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grant. The fair value of restricted stock-based payments is based on the market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of performance-based awards, which have performance conditions, is based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of all stock-based compensation is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. See Note 12.
Income Taxes—We elected on our initial U.S. federal income tax return to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to shareholders, and meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including asset holding requirements. As a REIT, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax for open taxable years through 2017, on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and we could not deduct dividends paid to our shareholders in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to shareholders. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from reelecting to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.
Subject to the temporary restriction imposed by the waiver and amendment to our Credit Agreement (see Note 11), our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts exceeding
We have elected to treat the subsidiaries through which we operate Uniti Fiber and Talk America, as well as certain portions of Uniti Towers, as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). TRSs enable us to engage in activities that result in income that does not constitute qualifying income for a REIT. Our TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized under the asset and liability method for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates based on currently enacted tax laws, which will be in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period of the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized.
The Company is subject to restrictions on distributions to its shareholders based on our Credit Agreement as amended. The restrictions permit the Company to make the minimum required distribution to maintain its status as a REIT, which is limited to
84
year 2020. Further, upon reversion, the Company expects to make one or more distributions to its shareholders to ensure that it has distributed at least
The Company will be subject to a federal corporate level tax on any gain recognized from the sale of assets occurring within a
Business Combinations and Asset Acquisitions—In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, we apply the acquisition method of accounting for acquisitions meeting the definition of a business combination or asset acquisition, where assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value at the date of each acquisition, and the results of operations are included with those of the Company from the dates of the respective acquisitions. The fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities are estimated using the income, market and/or cost approach. The income approach utilizes the present value of estimated future cash flows that a business or asset can be expected to generate, while under the market approach, the fair value of an asset or business reflects the price at which comparable assets are purchased under similar circumstances. Inherent in our preparation of cash flow projections are significant assumptions and estimates derived from a review of operating results, business plans, expected growth rates, capital expenditure plans, cost of capital and tax rates. We also make certain forecasts about future economic conditions, interest rates and other market data. Many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management. Small changes in these assumptions or estimates could materially affect the cash flow projections, and therefore could affect the estimated fair value. Impact these assumptions or estimates include customer retention, execution of our business plans, which impact growth, cost escalation impacting margin, the level of capital expenditures required to sustain our growth and market factors, including stock price fluctuations and increased rates, impacting our cost of capital.
For acquisitions meeting the definition of a business combination, any excess of the purchase price paid by the Company over the amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. ASC 805 also requires acquirers to, among other things, estimate the acquisition date fair value of any contingent consideration and recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. When provisional amounts are initially recorded, the Company continues to evaluate acquisitions for a period not to exceed one year after the applicable acquisition date of each transaction to determine whether any additional adjustments are needed to the allocation of the purchase price paid for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
For acquisitions meeting the definition of an asset acquisition, the fair value of the consideration transferred, including transaction costs, is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. There are significant judgments and estimates used in determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which include assumptions with respect to items such as replacement cost, land value, assemblage factor, discount rate, lease-up period, implied rents per strand mile, and useful life. No goodwill is recognized in an asset acquisition.
Noncontrolling Interest—The limited partner equity interests in our operating partnership are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for shares of our common stock or, at our election, cash of equivalent value. All of the limited partner equity interests in our operating partnership not held by the Company are reflected as noncontrolling interests. In the Consolidated Statements of Income, we allocate net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests to arrive at net income (loss) attributable to shareholders based on their proportionate share.
85
For transactions that result in changes to the Company's ownership interest in our operating partnership, the carrying amount of noncontrolling interests is adjusted to reflect such changes. The difference between the fair value of the consideration received or paid and the amount by which the noncontrolling interest is adjusted is reflected as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Goodwill—As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, all of our goodwill is included our Fiber Infrastructure segment. Goodwill is recognized for the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. In accordance with ASC 350-20, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, we evaluate goodwill for impairment between annual impairment tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Unless circumstances otherwise dictate, the annual impairment test is performed in the fourth quarter. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgment, including: the identification of reporting units; assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units; assignment of goodwill to reporting units. We performed our goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter, and we concluded the implied fair value of our Fiber Infrastructure reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value by less than
We estimate the fair value of our reporting units (which are our segments) using a combination of an income approach based on the present value of estimated future cash flows and a market approach based on market data of comparable businesses and acquisition multiples paid in recent transactions. We evaluate the appropriateness of each valuation methodology in determining the weighting applied to each methodology in the determination of the concluded fair value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit's net assets is less than its fair value, no indication of impairment exists. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is greater than the fair value of the reporting unit, an impairment loss must be recognized for the excess and recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.
Inherent in our preparation of cash flow projections are significant assumptions and estimates derived from a review of our operating results and business plans, which includes expected revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditure plans and cost of capital. In determining these assumptions, we consider our ability to execute on our plans, future economic conditions, interest rates and other market data. Many of the factors used in assessing fair value are outside the control of management, and these assumptions and estimates may change in future periods. As our concluded fair value of our Fiber Infrastructure reporting unit slightly exceeds carrying value, small changes in these assumptions or estimates could materially affect our cash flow projections, and therefore could affect the likelihood and amount of potential impairment in future periods. Potential events that could negatively impact these assumptions or estimates may include customer losses or poor execution of our business plans, which impact revenue growth, cost escalation impacting margin, the level of capital expenditures required to sustain our growth and market factors, including stock price fluctuations and increased rates, impacting our cost of capital. For example, if we were to experience a significant delay in our permitting process in the construction of our fiber networks, the timing of effected cash flows could impact long term growth rates and negatively impact the income approach, leading to potential impairment. As a result, should our expectations of average projected revenue growth percentage decrease by
Earnings per Share—Outstanding restricted stock awards that contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends are deemed to be participating securities, requiring the application of the two-class method of computing basic and dilutive earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share includes only the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common shares and the dilutive effect
86
Concentration of Credit Risks—We are party to a Master Lease with Windstream from which substantially all of Uniti’s leasing revenues and operating cash flows are currently derived. Revenue under the Master Lease provided
In response to the adverse outcome, on February 25, 2019, Windstream filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.
In bankruptcy, Windstream has the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. While we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations, it is difficult to predict what could occur in a restructuring, and even a temporary disruption in payments to us may require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties and avoid the imposition of liens on our properties and could impact our ability to fund other cash obligations, including dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, non-essential capital expenditures and, in an extreme case, our debt service obligations. See Note 2. A rejection by Windstream of the Master Lease or its inability or unwillingness to meet its rent and other obligations under the Master Lease could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition, including our ability to service debt, comply with debt covenants and pay dividends to our stockholders as required to maintain our status as a REIT. See Note 2.
Windstream’s stock is quoted on the OTC Markets under the ticker symbol “WINMQ.” Windstream is subject to the periodic filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, but Windstream is not current in its reporting obligations. Windstream filings can be found at www.sec.gov. Windstream filings are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Leases—Effective January 1, 2019, we account for leases in accordance with ASC 842. The standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is comprised of amortization on the right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and interest expense recognized based on an effective interest method, or as a single lease cost recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record an ROU asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. The accounting for lessors remains largely unchanged. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for consistent with existing guidance for operating leases today.
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. A lease exists when a contract conveys to the customer the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The definition of a lease embodies two conditions: (i) there is an identified asset in the contract that is
87
land or a depreciable asset (i.e., property, plant, and equipment), and (ii) the customer has the right to control the use of the identified asset.
We enter into lease contracts including ground, towers, equipment, office, colocation and fiber lease arrangements, in which we are the lessee, and service contracts that may include embedded leases. Operating leases where we are the lessor are included in Leasing, Fiber Infrastructure and Tower revenues on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
From time to time we may enter into direct financing lease arrangements that include (i) a lessee obligation to purchase the leased equipment at the end of the lease term, (ii) a bargain purchase option, (iii) a lease term having a duration that is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the leased equipment or (iv) provides for minimum lease payments with a present value amounting to substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset at the date of lease inception.
ROU assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases where we are the lessee are included in other assets and accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The lease liabilities are initially and subsequently measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments at the lease commencement date.
ROU assets and lease liabilities related to finance leases where we are the lessee are included in property, plant and equipment, net and finance lease obligations, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The lease liabilities are initially measured in the same manner as operating leases and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. ROU assets for finance leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease term.
Key estimates and judgments include how we determined (i) the discount rate we use to discount the unpaid lease payments to present value, (ii) lease term and (iii) lease payments.
|
i. |
ASC 842 requires a lessor to discount its unpaid lease payments using the interest rate implicit in the lease and a lessee to discount its unpaid lease payments using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, its incremental borrowing rate. As we generally do not know the implicit rate for our leases where we are the lessee, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Our incremental borrowing rate for a lease is the rate of interest we would have to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. |
|
ii. |
The lease term for all of our leases includes the noncancellable period of the lease plus any additional periods covered by either a lessee option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, or an option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease controlled by the lessor. |
|
iii. |
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease asset or liability comprise the following: (i) fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), (ii) variable payments that depend on index or rate based on the index or rate at lease commencement, and (iii) the exercise price of a lessee option to purchase the underlying asset if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. |
For operating leases where we are the lessor, we continue recognizing the underlying asset and depreciating it over its estimated useful life. Lease income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leasing revenue is not recognized when collection of all contractual rents over the term of the agreement is not probable. When collection is not probable, the lessee is placed on non-accrual status and Leasing revenue is recognized when cash payments are received.
Where we are the lessee, the ROU asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for lease payments made at or before the lease commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred less any lease incentives received.
88
For operating leases, the ROU asset is subsequently measured throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of the lease liability, plus initial direct costs, plus (minus) any prepaid (accrued) lease payments, less the unamortized balance of lease incentives received. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For finance leases, the ROU asset is subsequently amortized using the straight-line method from the lease commencement date to the earlier of the end of its useful life or the end of the lease term unless the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to us, or we are reasonably certain to exercise an option to purchase the underlying asset. In those cases, the ROU asset is amortized over the useful life of the underlying asset. Amortization of the ROU asset is recognized and presented separately from interest expense on the lease liability.
Variable lease payments associated with our leases are recognized when the event, activity, or circumstance in the lease agreement on which those payments are assessed occurs. Variable lease payments are presented within Leasing, Fiber Infrastructure and Tower revenues and general and administrative expense and operating expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income in the same line item as revenue arising from fixed lease payments (operating leases where we are the lessor) and expense arising from fixed lease payments (operating leases where we are the lessee) or amortization of the ROU asset (finance leases), respectively.
We monitor for events or changes in circumstances that require a reassessment of a lease. When a reassessment results in the remeasurement of a lease liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the corresponding ROU asset unless doing so would reduce the carrying amount of the ROU asset to an amount less than zero. In that case, the amount of the adjustment that would result in a negative ROU asset balance is recorded in general and administrative and operating expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
We have lease agreements which include lease and nonlease components. For both leases where we are a lessor and leases where we are a lessee, we have elected to combine lease and nonlease components for all lease contracts. Nonlease components that are combined with lease components are primarily maintenance services related to the leased asset. Where we are the lessor, we determine whether the lease or nonlease component is the predominant component on a case-by-case basis. For all existing leases where we are the lessor, the practical expedient in ASC Topic 842 has been applied to all combined components.
We have elected not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for all short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less. We recognize the lease payments associated with our short-term leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
We have elected to exclude sales taxes from lease payments in arrangements where we are a lessor.
We adopted ASC 842 using a modified retrospective transition approach as of the effective date as permitted by the amendments in ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Target Improvements, which provides an alternative modified retrospective transition method. As a result, we were not required to adjust our comparative period financial information for effects of the standard or make the new required lease disclosures for periods before the date of adoption (i.e. January 1, 2019). We have elected to adopt the package of transition practical expedients and, therefore, have not reassessed (i) whether existing or expired contracts contain a lease, (ii) lease classification for existing or expired leases or (iii) the accounting for initial direct costs that were previously capitalized. We elected the practical expedient to use hindsight for leases existing at the adoption date. Further, we elected to adopt the amendments in ASU 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, which permits an entity to elect an optional transaction practical expedient to not evaluate land easements that exist or expire before the Company’s adoption of ASC 842 and that were not previously accounted for as leases under ASC 840, Leases (“ASC 840”).
In connection with the adoption of ASC 842, we have recorded an adjustment to equity of $
89
Note 4. Revenues
Adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method, whereby the cumulative effect of initially applying Topic 606 is recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of equity at January 1, 2018. Therefore, comparative information has not been adjusted and continues to be reported under ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. We recorded a net increase to opening retained earnings of $
The details of the significant changes and quantitative impact of the changes are set out below. We have applied this guidance only to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018, the date of initial application.
Commissions
We previously recognized commission fees related to obtaining a contract as selling expenses when incurred. Under Topic 606 and Topic 340, Other Assets and Deferred Costs, when they are incremental or expected to be recovered, we capitalize those commission fees as costs of obtaining a contract and amortize them consistently with the pattern of transfer of the product or service to which the asset relates. These amortized costs are included in general and administrative expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. These deferred balances were $
Nature of goods and services
The following is a description of principal activities, separated by reportable segments (see Note 14), from which the Company generates its revenues.
Leasing
Leasing revenue represents the results from our leasing program, Uniti Leasing, which is engaged in the acquisition of mission-critical communications assets and leasing them back to anchor customers on either an exclusive or shared-tenant basis. Due to the nature of these activities, they are outside the scope of the guidance of Topic 606, and are recognized under other applicable guidance, including ASC 842, and for periods prior to January 1, 2019 ASC 840. See Note 5.
Fiber Infrastructure
The Fiber Infrastructure segment represents the operations of our fiber business, Uniti Fiber, which provides (i) consumer, enterprise, wholesale and backhaul lit fiber, (ii) E-rate, (iii) small cell, (iv) construction services, (v) dark fiber and (vi) other revenue generating activities.
|
i. |
Consumer, enterprise, wholesale, and backhaul lit fiber fall under the guidance of Topic 606. Revenue is recognized over the life of the contracts in a pattern that reflects the satisfaction of Uniti’s stand-ready obligation to provide lit fiber services. The transaction price is equal to the monthly-recurring charge multiplied by the contract term, plus any non-recurring or variable charges. For each contract, the customer is invoiced monthly. |
90
|
ii. |
E-rate contracts involve providing lit fiber services to schools and libraries, and is governed by Topic 606. Revenue is recognized over the life of the contract in a pattern that reflects the satisfaction of Uniti’s stand-ready obligation to provide lit fiber services. The transaction price is equal to the monthly-recurring charge multiplied by the contract term, plus any non-recurring or variable charges. For each contract, the customer is invoiced monthly. |
|
iii. |
Small cell contracts provide improved network connection to areas that may not require or accommodate a tower. Small cell arrangements typically contain five streams of revenue: site development, radio frequency (“RF”) design, dark fiber lease, construction services, and maintenance services. Site development, RF design and construction are each separate services and are considered distinct performance obligations under Topic 606. Dark fiber and associated maintenance services constitute a lease, and as such, they are outside the scope of Topic 606 and are governed by other applicable guidance. |
|
iv. |
Construction revenue is generated from contracts to provide various construction services such as equipment installation or the laying of fiber. Construction revenue is recognized over time as construction activities occur as we are either enhancing a customer’s owned asset or constructing an asset with no alternative use to us and we would be entitled to our costs plus a reasonable profit margin if the contract was terminated early by the customer. We are utilizing our costs incurred as the measure of progress of satisfying our performance obligation. |
|
v. |
Dark fiber arrangements represent operating leases under ASC 842, and ASC 840 for periods prior to January 1, 2019, and is outside the scope of Topic 606. When (i) a customer makes an advance payment or (ii) a customer is contractually obligated to pay any amounts in advance, which is not deemed a separate performance obligation, deferred leasing revenue is recorded. This leasing revenue is recognized ratably over the expected term of the contract, unless the pattern of service suggests otherwise. |
|
vi. |
The Company generates revenues from other services, such as consultation services and equipment sales. Revenue from the sale of customer premise equipment and modems that are not provided as an essential part of the telecommunications services, including broadband, long distance, and enhanced services is recognized when products are delivered to and accepted by the customer. Revenue from customer premise equipment and modems provided as an essential part of the telecommunications services, including broadband, long distance, and enhanced services are recognized over time in a pattern that reflects the satisfaction of the service performance obligation. |
Towers
The Towers segment represents the operations of our towers business, Uniti Towers, through which we acquire and construct tower and tower-related real estate, which we then lease to our customers in the United States. Revenue from our towers business qualifies as a lease under ASC 842, and ASC 840 for periods prior to January 1, 2019, and is outside the scope of Topic 606.
Consumer CLEC
The Consumer CLEC segment represents the operations of Talk America Services (“Talk America”) through which we operate the Consumer CLEC Business, which provides local telephone, high-speed internet and long-distance services to customers in the eastern and central United States. Customers are billed monthly for services rendered based on actual usage or contracted amounts. The transaction price is equal to the monthly-recurring charge multiplied by the initial contract term (typically 12 months), plus any non-recurring or variable charges.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue stream.
91
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017(1) |
|
|||
Revenue disaggregated by revenue stream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from contracts with customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lit backhaul |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Enterprise and wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Rate and government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from contracts with customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue accounted for under other applicable guidance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
As noted above, periods prior to January 1, 2018 have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective method. |
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, lease receivables were $
Contract Assets (Unbilled Revenue) and Liabilities (Deferred Revenue)
Contract assets primarily consist of unbilled construction revenue where we are utilizing our costs incurred as the measure of progress of satisfying our performance obligation. When the contract price is invoiced, the related unbilled receivable is reclassified to trade accounts receivable, where the balance will be settled upon the collection of the invoiced amount. Contract liabilities are generally comprised of upfront fees charged to the customer for the cost of establishing the necessary components of the Company’s network prior to the commencement of use by the customer. Fees charged to customers for the recurring use of the Company’s network are recognized during the related periods of service. Upfront fees that are billed in advance of providing services are deferred until such time the customer accepts the Company’s network and then are recognized as service revenues ratably over a period in which substantive services required under the revenue arrangement are expected to be performed, which is the initial term of the arrangement. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized revenues of $
The following table provides information about contract assets and contract liabilities accounted for under Topic 606.
(Thousands) |
|
Contract Assets |
|
|
Contract Liabilities |
|
||
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations
Performance obligations within contracts to stand ready to provide services are typically satisfied over time or as those services are provided. Contract assets primarily relate to costs incremental to obtaining contracts and contract liabilities primarily relate to deferred revenue from non-recurring charges. The deferred revenue is recognized, and the liability reduced, over the contract term as the Company completes the performance obligation. As of December 31, 2019, our future revenues (i.e. transaction price related to remaining performance obligations) under contract accounted for under Topic 606 totaled $
92
Practical Expedients and Exemptions
We do not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less.
We exclude from the transaction price any amounts collected from customers for sales taxes and therefore, they are not included in revenue.
Note 5. Leases
Lessor Accounting
We lease communications towers, ground, communications equipment, and dark fiber to tenants under operating leases. Our leases have initial lease terms ranging from
The components of lease income for the year ended December 31, 2019 is as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Lease income - operating leases |
|
$ |
|
|
Lease payments to be received under non-cancellable operating leases where we are the lessor for the remainder of the lease terms are as follows:
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
|||||
(Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2019 (1) |
|
|
December 31, 2018 (2) |
|
||
2020 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease receivables |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
|
|||||||
(2) |
|
The underlying assets under operating leases where we are the lessor as of December 31, 2019 are summarized as follows:
93
(Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
|
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
|
|
Real property interest |
|
|
- |
|
Poles |
|
|
|
|
Fiber |
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
|
|
Conduit |
|
|
|
|
Tower assets |
|
|
|
|
Finance lease assets |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
( |
) |
Underlying assets under operating leases, net |
|
$ |
|
|
Depreciation expense for the underlying assets under operating leases where we are the lessor for the year ended December 31, 2019 is summarized as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Depreciation expense for underlying assets under operating leases |
|
$ |
|
|
Lessee Accounting
We have commitments under operating leases for communications towers, ground, colocation and dark fiber lease arrangements. We also have finance leases for dark fiber lease arrangements and other communications equipment. Our leases have initial lease terms ranging from less than
As of December 31, 2019, we have short term lease commitments amounting to approximately $
The components of lease cost are presented within general and administrative expense and operating expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2019 is as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Finance lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of ROU assets |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest on lease liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Total finance lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Operating lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Short-term lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Variable lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Less sublease income |
|
|
( |
) |
Total lease cost |
|
$ |
|
|
Amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for leases where we are the lessee as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:
94
(Thousands) |
|
Location on Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROU asset, net |
|
Other assets, net |
|
$ |
|
|
ROU liability |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROU asset, gross |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
|
|
ROU liability |
|
Finance lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average remaining lease term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Other information related to leases as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows from finance leases |
|
$ |
|
|
Operating cash flows from operating leases |
|
|
|
|
Financing cash flows from finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
New operating leases |
|
$ |
|
|
New finance leases |
|
|
|
|
Future lease payments under non-cancellable leases as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
Finance Leases |
|
||
2020 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undiscounted lease payments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less: imputed interest |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total lease liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2018(1) were as follows:
95
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
(1) Prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective transition approach. |
|
Future minimum rental payments under capital leases in effect as of December 31, 2018(1) were as follows:
2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments |
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest |
|
|
( |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
(1) Prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective transition approach. |
|
Future sublease rentals as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Sublease Rentals |
|
|
2020 |
|
$ |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
Note 6. Business Combinations, Asset Acquisitions and Dispositions
2019 Transactions
Bluebird Network, LLC
On August 30, 2019, the Company closed on its operating company/property company (“OpCo-PropCo”) transaction with Macquarie Infrastructure Partners (“MIP”) to acquire Bluebird Network, LLC (“Bluebird”). MIP operates within the Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets division of Macquarie Group. Bluebird’s network consists of approximately
96
triple net lease (the “Bluebird Lease”). The Bluebird Lease is reported within the results of our Leasing segment. The Midwest operations that was sold to MIP was previously reported in our Fiber Infrastructure segment.
The acquisition of the Bluebird network was accounted for as an asset acquisition. The following is a summary of the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company re-evaluated the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and associated useful lives, which resulted in a decrease in the fair value of property, plant and equipment and an increase in the fair value of intangible assets of approximately $
Acquired right of use assets and liabilities of $
Upon the sale of our Midwest operations, we recognized an approximately $
Sale of Ground Lease Portfolio
On May 23, 2019, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of its U.S. ground lease business. During second quarter, we received cash consideration of $
Sale of Latin American Tower Portfolio
On April 2, 2019, the Company completed the sale of the Uniti Towers’ Latin America business (“LATAM”) to an entity controlled by Phoenix Towers International for cash consideration of $
JKM Consulting Inc. (M2 Connections)
On
97
2018 Transactions
Information Transport Solutions, Inc.
On
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
( |
) |
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
The goodwill arising from the transaction is primarily attributable to strategic opportunities that arose from the acquisition of ITS, including strengthening relationships with new and existing E-Rate customers and anticipated incremental sales and cost savings. For federal income tax purposes, the transaction was treated as a taxable acquisition. Thus, all of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
We acquired an intangible asset that was assigned to customer relationships of $
The acquired business contributed revenue of $
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma summary of our financial results as if the ITS acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2017. The pro forma results include additional amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments related to the intangible asset. The pro forma results do not include any synergies or other benefits of the acquisition.
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
|
||
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
98
2017 Transactions
Southern Light, LLC
On
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
( |
) |
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
( |
) |
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
During the second quarter of 2018, the purchase price allocation was adjusted to record $
The goodwill arising from the transaction is primarily attributable to the expansion of our fiber network through the complementary nature of Southern Light’s fiber network to our existing fiber network, including anticipated incremental sales and cost savings. For federal income tax purposes, the transaction was treated as partially taxable (for portion paid in cash) and partially non-taxable (for portion paid with common units in the Operating Partnership). The portion of the acquisition that was treated as a taxable acquisition resulted in tax deductible goodwill. No tax deductible goodwill resulted from the portion of the acquisition that was treated as non-taxable.
We acquired an intangible asset that was assigned to customer relationships of $
The acquired business contributed revenue of $
The acquisition of Southern Light was structured in a manner such that Southern Light ended up being owned by a subsidiary of ours with a pre-existing valuation allowance primarily related to deferred tax assets associated with net operating loss carryforwards. The acquisition of Southern Light also resulted in a change to our assessment of the need for a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decrease to the valuation allowance of $
99
Hunt Telecommunications, LLC
On
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
( |
) |
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
( |
) |
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
During the first quarter of 2018, the purchase price allocation was adjusted to record certain deferred revenues and accrued liabilities that existed at the date of acquisition. Deferred revenue and accrued liabilities increased $
During the second quarter of 2018, the purchase price allocation was adjusted to record $
The goodwill arising from the transaction is primarily attributable to the expansion of our fiber network through the complementary nature of Hunt’s fiber network to our existing fiber network, including anticipated incremental sales and cost savings. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
We acquired an intangible asset that was assigned to customer relationships of $
The acquired business contributed revenue of $
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma summary of our financial results as if the Southern Light and Hunt business combinations had occurred on January 1, 2016. The pro forma results include additional depreciation and amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments, and interest expense associated with debt used to fund the acquisition. The pro forma results do not include any synergies or other benefits of the acquisition.
100
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
||
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Network Management Holdings LTD
On
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Intangible liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
( |
) |
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
Of the $
As discussed above, the Company completed the sale of the Uniti Towers’ Latin America business on April 2, 2019.
Note 7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, establishes a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the observability of inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair values. This hierarchy establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the assessment date
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
101
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, derivative instruments, contingent consideration, our outstanding notes and other debt, and accounts, interest and dividends payable.
The following table summarizes the fair value of our financial instruments at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
(Thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
|
|
Prices with Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Prices with Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|
||||
At December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured term loan B - variable rate, due |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Senior secured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Senior unsecured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Senior unsecured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Exchangeable senior unsecured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Senior secured revolving credit facility, variable rate, due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
|
|
Prices with Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Prices with Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|
||||
At December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative asset |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured term loan B - variable rate, due |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Senior secured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Senior unsecured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Senior unsecured notes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Senior secured revolving credit facility, variable rate, due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, and accounts, interest and dividends payable approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
The total principal balance of our Notes and other debt was $
102
current market rates for similar debt instruments, among other factors, which are classified as Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. Derivative instruments are carried at fair value. See Note 9. The fair value of our interest rate swap is determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows using observable, quoted LIBOR swap rates for the full term of the swap and also incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both Uniti 's own non-performance risk and non-performance risk of the respective counterparties. The Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative instruments fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however the associated credit valuation adjustments utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall value of the derivatives. As such, the Company classifies its derivative instruments valuation in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Given the limited trade activity of the Exchangeable Notes, the fair value of the Exchangeable Notes (see Note 11) is determined based on inputs that are observable in the market and have been classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Specifically, we estimated the fair value of the Exchangeable Notes based on readily available external pricing information, quoted market prices, and current market rates for similar convertible debt instruments.
As part of the acquisition of Hunt on July 3, 2017, we may be obligated to pay contingent consideration (the “Hunt Contingent Consideration”) upon the achievement of certain defined revenue milestones. The fair value of the Hunt Contingent Consideration was determined using the closing price of our common shares in the active market and probability of expected dividends and is classified as Level 3. On January 4, 2019, we settled the Hunt Contingent Consideration in full satisfaction of the obligation through the issuance of
As part of the acquisition of Tower Cloud on August 31, 2016, we may be obligated to pay contingent consideration upon achievement of certain defined operational and financial milestones; therefore, we recorded the estimated fair value of future contingent consideration of $
Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration will be recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Income in the period in which the change occurs. For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was a $
The following is a roll forward of our liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3):
(Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
(Gain)/Loss included in earnings |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|||||
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
103
Note 8. Property, Plant and Equipment
The carrying value of property, plant and equipment is as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Depreciable Lives |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Land |
|
Indefinite |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real property interests |
|
See Note 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conduit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tower assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease assets |
|
See Note 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress |
|
See Note 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Finance lease assets above represent fiber leases, where we have the exclusive, unrestricted, and indefeasible right to use one, a pair, or more strands of fiber of a fiber cable.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $
Note 9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate the effects of interest rate volatility inherent in our variable rate debt, which could unfavorably impact our future earnings and forecasted cash flows. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
We are party to interest rate swap agreements to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in our variable rate Senior Secured Term Loan B facility. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and have a notional value of $
The following table summarizes the fair value and the presentation in our Consolidated Balance Sheet:
(Thousands) |
|
Location on Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Interest rate swaps |
|
Derivative asset |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Derivative liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
As of December 31, 2019, all of the interest rate swaps were valued in net unrealized loss positions and recognized as a liability balance within the derivative liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018, all of the interest rate swaps were valued in net unrealized gain positions and recognized as an asset balance within the derivative asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the amount recorded in other comprehensive income related to the derivative instruments was $
104
reclassified out of other comprehensive income into interest expense on our Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt.
As result of the repayment of the Company’s term loan facility in February of 2020 (see Note 22), the Company entered into receive-fixed interest rate swaps (the “Replacement Swaps”) to offset its existing pay-fixed interest rate swaps (the “Existing Swaps”) that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments initially associated with the term loan facility. On February 10, 2020, the Company discontinued hedge accounting on its Existing Swaps as the hedge accounting requirements were no longer met. Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income associated with the Existing Swaps as of the date of dedesignation, will be reclassified to interest expense as the hedged interest payments impact earnings. The net effect of these offsetting interest rate swaps will result in a monthly cash outflow of approximately $
Exchangeable Notes Hedge Transactions
On June 25, 2019, concurrently with the pricing of the Exchangeable Notes (see Note 10), and on June 27, 2019, concurrently with the exercise by the Initial Purchasers (as defined below) of their option to purchase additional Exchangeable Notes, Uniti Fiber, the issuer of the Exchangeable Notes, entered into the Note Hedge Transactions with certain of the Counterparties. The Note Hedge Transactions cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the Exchangeable Notes, the same number of shares of the Company’s common stock that initially underlie the Exchangeable Notes in the aggregate and are exercisable upon exchange of the Exchangeable Notes. The Note Hedge Transactions have an initial strike price that corresponds to the initial exchange price of the Exchangeable Notes, subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the Exchangeable Notes. The Note Hedge Transactions will expire upon the maturity of the Exchangeable Notes, if not earlier exercised. The Note Hedge Transactions are intended to reduce potential dilution to the Company’s common stock upon any exchange of the Exchangeable Notes and/or offset any cash payments Uniti Fiber is required to make in excess of the principal amount of exchanged Exchangeable Notes, as the case may be, in the event that the market value per share of the Company’s common stock, as measured under the Note Hedge Transactions, at the time of exercise is greater than the strike price of the Note Hedge Transactions.
The Note Hedge Transactions are separate transactions, entered into by Uniti Fiber with the Counterparties, and are not part of the terms of the Exchangeable Notes. Holders of the Exchangeable Notes will not have any rights with respect to the Note Hedge Transactions. Uniti Fiber used approximately $
Warrant Transactions
On June 25, 2019, concurrently with the pricing of the Exchangeable Notes, and on June 27, 2019 concurrently with the exercise by the Initial Purchasers of their option to purchase additional Exchangeable Notes, the Company entered into warrant transactions to sell to the Counterparties Warrants to acquire, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, up to approximately
105
The Warrants are separate transactions, entered into by the Company with the Counterparties, and are not part of the terms of the Exchangeable Notes. Holders of the Exchangeable Notes will not have any rights with respect to the Warrants. The Company received approximately $
Note 10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill occurring during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Total |
|
||
Goodwill at December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Goodwill purchase accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill associated with 2018 acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill purchase accounting adjustments |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Goodwill associated with 2019 acquisitions and dispositions, net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Goodwill at December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The carrying value of our other intangible assets is as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Cumulative Translation Adjustment |
|
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Cumulative Translation Adjustment |
|
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
||||||
Indefinite life intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite life intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer lists |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
In-place lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Tenant contracts |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Network(1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Rights of Way |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Acquired below-market leases |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite life intangible liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired above-market leases |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
(624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible liabilities, net(2) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has commenced a wind down of our Consumer CLEC Business, estimated to be completed during the second quarter of 2020. As such, we have accelerated the amortization of the related customer list intangible asset. As of December 31, 2019, the CLEC customer list intangible list asset had a carrying value of $
As of December 31, 2019, the remaining weighted average amortization period of the Company’s intangible assets was
Note 11. Notes and Other Debt
All debt, including the senior secured credit facility and notes described below, are obligations of the Operating Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries as discussed below. The Company is, however, a guarantor of such debt.
Notes and other debt is as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Principal amount |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less unamortized discount, premium and debt issuance costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Notes and other debt less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Notes and other debt at December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Principal |
|
|
Unamortized Discount, Premium and Debt Issuance Costs |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Unamortized Discount, Premium and Debt Issuance Costs |
|
||||
Senior secured term loan B - variable rate, due (discount is based on imputed interest rate of |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Senior secured notes - (discount is based on imputed interest rate of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Senior unsecured notes - (discount is based on imputed interest rate of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Senior unsecured notes - (discount is based on imputed interest rate of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Exchangeable senior unsecured notes - (discount is based on imputed interest rate of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Senior secured revolving credit facility, variable rate, due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
107
At December 31, 2019, notes and other debt included the following: (i) $
Credit Agreement
Uniti Group LP, Uniti Group Finance 2019 Inc. and CSL Capital, LLC (the “Borrowers”) are party to the Credit Agreement, which as of December 31, 2019, provided for the Term Loan Facility (in an initial principal amount of $
All obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by (i) the Company and (ii) certain of the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) and are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers and the Subsidiary Guarantors, which assets also secure the Secured Notes.
The Revolving Credit Facility presently bears interest at a rate equal to either a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from
The Borrowers are subject to customary covenants under the Credit Agreement, including an obligation to maintain a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, not to exceed
A termination of the Master Lease would result in an “event of default” under the Credit Agreement if a replacement lease was not entered into within ninety (90) calendar days and we do not maintain pro forma compliance with a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of 5.00 to 1.00.
108
On March 18, 2019, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2018 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the fourth amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to our Credit Agreement. During the pendency of Windstream’s bankruptcy, the Fourth Amendment generally limits our ability under the Credit Agreement to (i) prepay unsecured indebtedness and (ii) pay cash dividends in excess of
On June 24, 2019, we entered into an amendment (the “Fifth Amendment”) to our Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date of $
On February 10, 2020, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2019 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with an amendment (the “Sixth Amendment”) to our Credit Agreement. In addition to the restrictions imposed by the Fourth Amendment discussed above, which remain effective, the Sixth Amendment also limits the ability of our non-guarantor subsidiaries to incur indebtedness. The Sixth Amendment increased the interest rate on our revolving facility by
The Notes
The Borrowers, as co-issuers, have outstanding $
The Operating Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CSL Capital, LLC and Uniti Fiber, as co-issuers, have outstanding $
On February 10, 2020, the Operating Partnership, CSL Capital, LLC, Uniti Group Finance 2019 Inc. and Uniti Fiber, as co-issuers, issued $
The Exchangeable Notes
On June 28, 2019, Uniti Fiber, a subsidiary of the Company, issued $
109
exchangeable into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof, at Uniti Fiber’s election, subject to limitations under the Company's Credit Agreement. The Exchangeable Notes will mature on
Uniti Fiber issued the Exchangeable Notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of June 28, 2019 (the “Indenture”), among Uniti Fiber, the Company, the other guarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee. Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding March 15, 2024, the Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable only upon satisfaction of certain conditions and during certain periods described in the Indenture, and thereafter, the Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable at any time until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. The Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable on the terms set forth in the Indenture into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof, at Uniti Fiber’s election, subject to limitations under the Company's Credit Agreement. The exchange rate is initially
If Uniti Fiber or the Company undergoes a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture), subject to certain conditions, holders may require Uniti Fiber to repurchase for cash all or part of their Exchangeable Notes at a repurchase price equal to
Uniti Fiber may redeem all or a portion of the Exchangeable Notes, at any time, at a cash redemption price equal to
On June 28, 2019, Uniti Fiber, the Company and Barclays Capital Inc., on behalf of the initial purchasers involved in the offering of the Exchangeable Notes (the “Initial Purchasers”), entered into a registration rights agreement with respect to the Company’s common stock deliverable upon exchange of the Exchangeable Notes (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company has agreed to file a shelf registration statement to register the resale of the common stock of the Company deliverable upon exchange of the Exchangeable Notes. The Company has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause such shelf registration statement to become effective on or prior to the 365th day after the issue date of the Exchangeable Notes.
Under GAAP, certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion are required to be separately accounted for as liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. Accordingly, in accounting for the issuance of the Exchangeable Notes, the Company separated the Exchangeable Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature.
The carrying amount of the equity component, which is recognized as a debt discount, represents the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the Exchangeable Notes and the fair value of the liability component of the Exchangeable Notes. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount will
110
be amortized to interest expense using an effective interest rate of
Debt issuance costs related to the Exchangeable Notes were comprised of commissions payable to the Initial Purchasers of $
In accounting for the debt issuance costs related to the issuance of the Exchangeable Notes, the Company allocated the total amount incurred to the liability and equity components based on their relative values. Debt issuance costs attributable to the liability component were recorded as a contra-liability and are presented net against the Exchangeable Notes balance on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the Exchangeable Notes. Debt issuance costs of $
Deferred Financing Cost
Deferred financing costs were incurred in connection with the issuance of the Notes and the Facilities. These costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related indebtedness, and are included in interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recognized $
Aggregate annual maturities of our long-term obligations at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
$ |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
Note 12. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Uniti Group Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), which is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Awards issuable under the Equity Plan include incentive stock options, “non-qualified” stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units and performance shares, restricted shares, and restricted stock units.
Restricted Awards
111
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Awards |
|
|
Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) ($000s) |
|
|||
Unvested balance December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance, December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2018, there were
The total fair value of shares vested for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $
As of December 31, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense on restricted awards was approximately $
Performance Awards
The Company grants long-term incentives to members of management in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) under the Equity Plan. The number of PSUs earned is based on the Company’s achievement of specified performance goals, over a specified performance period, and may range from
112
On April 4, 2019, we issued
|
|
Performance Awards |
|
|
Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) ($000s) |
|
|||
Unvested balance December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance, December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2019. The market value as of December 31, 2019 was $ |
During the year ended December 31, 2018, there were
As of December 31, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense related to PSUs was approximately $
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Expected term (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Expected annual dividend |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Risk free rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On May 17, 2018, our stockholders approved and adopted the Uniti Group Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP authorizes us to issue up to
113
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||
Expected term (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Expected annual dividend |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Risk free rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recognized $
Note 13. Earnings Per Share
Our restricted stock awards are considered participating securities as they receive non-forfeitable rights to dividends at the same rate as common stock. As participating securities, we included these instruments in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method described in FASB ASC 260, Earnings per Share.
We also issue PSUs that contain forfeitable rights to receive dividends and are therefore considered non-participating restrictive shares and are not dilutive under the two-class method until performance conditions are met. During the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately
Prior to the second quarter of 2019, the earnings-per-share impact of the Company’s
The dilutive effect of the Exchangeable Notes (see Note 11) is calculated by using the “if-converted” method. This assumes an add-back of interest, net of income taxes, to net income attributable to shareholders as if the securities were converted at the beginning of the reporting period (or at time of issuance, if later) and the resulting common shares included in the number of weighted average shares. The dilutive effect of the Warrants (see Note 8) is calculated using the treasury-stock method. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Warrants were excluded from diluted shares outstanding because the exercise price exceeded the average market price of our common stock for the reporting period.
As part of the acquisition of Tower Cloud on August 31, 2016, we may be obligated to pay contingent consideration upon achievement of certain defined operational and financial milestones. See Note 6. At the Company’s discretion, a combination of cash and Uniti common shares may be used to satisfy the contingent consideration payments, provided that at least
114
The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Less: Income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Less: Income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Amortization of discount on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Impact on if-converted dilutive securities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Mark-to-market gain on share settled contingent consideration arrangements |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration (See Note 5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on if-converted dilutive securities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Effect of dilutive non-participating securities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Weighted-average shares for dilutive earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Note 14. Segment Information
Our management, including our chief executive officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, manages our operations as
115
Leasing: Represents a component of our REIT operations and includes the results from our leasing business, Uniti Leasing, which is engaged in the acquisition of mission-critical communications assets and leasing them back to anchor customers on either an exclusive or shared-tenant basis.
Fiber Infrastructure: Represents the operations of our fiber business, Uniti Fiber, which is a leading provider of infrastructure solutions, including cell site backhaul and dark fiber, to the telecommunications industry.
Towers: Represents the operations of our towers business, Uniti Towers, through which we acquire and construct tower and tower-related real estate and lease space on communications towers to wireless service providers and other tenants in the United States. On April 2, 2019, the Company completed the sale of LATAM and no longer has on-going operations in Latin America. During 2019, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of its ground lease business located across the United States. See Note 6. In February 2020, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell
Consumer CLEC: Represents the operations of Talk America Services (“Talk America”) through which we operate the Consumer CLEC Business, which prior to the Spin-Off was reported as an integrated operation within Windstream. Talk America provides local telephone, high-speed internet and long distance services to customers in the eastern and central United States. We have commenced a wind down of our Consumer CLEC business, which we estimate will be completed during the second quarter of 2020.
Corporate: Represents our corporate office and shared service functions. Certain costs and expenses, primarily related to headcount, insurance, professional fees and similar charges, that are directly attributable to operations of our business segments are allocated to the respective segments.
Management evaluates the performance of each segment using Adjusted EBITDA, which is a segment performance measure we define as net income determined in accordance with GAAP, before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, the impact, which may be recurring in nature, of transaction and integration related expenses, costs associated with Windstream’s bankruptcy, costs associated with litigation claims made against us, and costs associated with the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system, the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs, costs incurred as a result of the early repayment of debt, gains or losses on dispositions, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and financial instruments, and other similar items. The Company believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings metric; however, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA serves as a useful supplement to net income because it allows investors, analysts and management to evaluate the performance of our segments in a manner that is comparable period over period. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income as determined in accordance with GAAP.
116
Selected financial data related to our segments is presented below for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
|
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
117
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
Leasing |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total of Reportable Segments |
|
||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
|
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction related and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (1) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
|
Total assets by business segment as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
(Thousands) |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
Leasing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fiber Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer CLEC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of reportable segments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to claims and administrative proceedings, none of which we believe are material or would be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into with Windstream in connection with the Spin-Off, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us (including our subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees and agents and certain other related parties) for any liability arising from or relating to legal proceedings involving Windstream's telecommunications business prior to the Spin-Off, and, pursuant to the Master Lease, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, any use, misuse, maintenance or repair by Windstream with respect to the Distribution Systems. Windstream is currently a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings, including various claims arising in the ordinary course of its telecommunications business, which are subject to the indemnities provided to us by Windstream. If Windstream assumes the Separation and Distribution Agreement and/or the Master Lease in bankruptcy, it would be obligated to honor all indemnification claims arising
118
under such agreement. If the Separation and Distribution Agreement and or the Master Lease are rejected in Windstream’s bankruptcy, any claims on the applicable indemnity would be treated as unsecured claims, and, if that were to occur, there can be no assurance we would receive any related indemnification payments from Windstream in connection with the applicable indemnity claims.
On July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services, LLC (“Windstream Services”) filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in an adversary proceeding against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, that certain rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and that Uniti breached certain of its obligations under the Master Lease. As further described below, an adverse determination in the adversary proceeding with Windstream could materially adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition and our status as a REIT.
Rejection. In bankruptcy, Windstream has the option to assume or reject the Master Lease. Because the Master Lease is a single indivisible Master Lease with a single rent payment, it must be assumed or rejected in whole and cannot be sub-divided by facility or market. A significant amount of Windstream’s revenue is generated from the use of our network included in the Master Lease, and we believe that the Master Lease is essential to Windstream’s operations. Furthermore, Windstream is designated as a “carrier of last resort” in certain markets where it utilizes the Master Lease to provide service to its customers, and we believe Windstream would require approval from the applicable PUC and the FCC to cease providing service in those markets. As a result, although we can provide no assurances, we believe the probability of Windstream rejecting the Master Lease in bankruptcy to be remote. A rejection of the Master Lease, or even a temporary disruption in payments to us, would require us to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties and avoid the imposition of liens on our properties and could impact our ability to fund other cash obligations, including dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, non-essential capital expenditures and our debt service obligations and could otherwise affect our ability to maintain REIT status.
A rejection of the Master Lease by Windstream could result in an “event of default” under our Credit Agreement if we are unable to enter into a replacement lease that satisfies certain criteria set forth in the Credit Agreement within ninety (90) calendar days and we do not maintain pro forma compliance with a consolidated secured leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of
The Master Lease contains no provision that contemplates renegotiation of the lease and the bankruptcy court has no ability to unilaterally reset the rent or terms of the lease. In addition, our Credit Agreement prohibits us from amending the Master Lease in a manner that, among other provisions, pro forma for any such amendment, would result in our consolidated secured leverage ratio exceeding 5.00 to 1.00, and management has no intention to enter into a lease amendment that would violate our debt covenants. However, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring, including as a result of the adversary proceeding brought by Windstream related to the Master Lease if the Settlement is not implemented.
Mediation. Uniti, Windstream and Windstream’s creditors have been engaged in mediation in the Windstream bankruptcy to resolve claims brought by Windstream against Uniti. We have recently announced an agreement in principle to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement (see Note 22).
We are committed to seeking a successful resolution that would involve release of all claims against us and continuation of the Master Lease. Discussions among the parties to the mediation continue but, to date, no agreement has been reached, and we cannot predict if or when an agreement will be reached or what its impact or terms would be. Although we believe that a successful renegotiation of the Master Lease is in the interests of all
119
parties, any such resolution could result in transfers of value to Windstream that could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
Recharacterization / Pending Master Lease Litigation. On July 25, 2019, in connection with Windstream’s bankruptcy, Windstream Holdings and Windstream Services filed a complaint with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Uniti and certain of its affiliates, alleging¸ among other things, that (1) the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, (2) rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers, (3) the Master Lease is a lease of personal property and (4) Uniti has breached its non-competition obligations to Windstream under the Master Lease, each of which allegations is discussed in more detail below. As described above, the trial for the recharacterization claim has been stayed.
Recharacterization. Windstream asserts that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement. If the Master Lease were recharacterized as a financing arrangement, Windstream has argued that Windstream should be deemed the true owner of the property subject to the Master Lease, and Uniti should be treated as a creditor of Windstream rather than as a landlord. In evaluating a recharacterization claim, the Bankruptcy Court will look to assess, among other things, the “economic realities” of the transaction and may reach conclusions notwithstanding positions previously taken by Windstream or Uniti as to the nature of the Master Lease, whether publicly or otherwise. In assessing claims for recharacterization of a transaction involving a lease, bankruptcy courts have previously considered such factors as (i) whether the lessor retains residual value at the termination of the lease, (ii) whether “rental” payments were calculated to compensate the lessor for the use of the property, or were structured for another purpose, such as providing a specific return on investment, (iii) whether in a sale-leaseback transaction the purchase price charged for the assets related to the fair market value of the assets or a substantially different amount, such as the amount of financing required by the lessee, (iv) whether the property was purchased specifically for the lessee’s use, (v) whether structuring the transaction as a lease conveyed tax advantages for the parties, and (vi) who bears the risk and benefits of ownership, including whether the lessee retains obligations typically associated with ownership, such as responsibility for property taxes and insurance. Because any determination by the Bankruptcy Court will involve complex factual and legal analysis, including with respect to the factors described above, we cannot provide any assurances as to how the Bankruptcy Court may rule on these issues.
Were the Bankruptcy Court to hold that the Master Lease should be recharacterized as a financing arrangement, it could significantly affect or even eliminate current payments to us under the Master Lease and could significantly affect the ultimate treatment of our claims (including potentially through changing our status to that of a creditor that would share in creditor recoveries from the estate rather than receive rent payments). The Bankruptcy Court could determine that Windstream is the true owner of the property subject to the Master Lease, and we have argued that such property would be deemed to be owned by Windstream Holdings as the counterparty to the Master Lease and that Uniti would have a claim against Windstream Holdings that is secured by such property. Windstream has argued that such property would instead be owned by the operating subsidiaries that previously held it and that our claims would be against Windstream Holdings as the counterparty to the Master Lease. In such an event, the Bankruptcy Court would also determine if our claims are secured by an interest in the leased property. If the Bankruptcy Court were to determine that our claims are not secured by an interest in the leased property, our claims could be unsecured and structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors at Windstream Holdings’ subsidiaries, including Windstream Services. Windstream Services is the issuer of substantially all of Windstream’s debt obligations and certain of its operating subsidiaries guarantee such debt obligations. Were we to be treated as an unsecured creditor of Windstream Holdings, we would not be able to recover any value from Windstream Services or such other operating subsidiaries until all of their respective debt obligations have been satisfied and, in such event, the notes and the guarantees of the notes would only be secured on a first-priority basis by certain of our assets that do not constitute the property subject to the Master Lease. In the event of such an adverse determination, our ability to meet our debt and other obligations could be materially impaired. In addition, recharacterization of the Master Lease as a financing arrangement, depending on the findings of fact and law of, and remedies applied by, the Bankruptcy Court, could affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Master Lease, our status as a REIT (see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT—Recent developments surrounding Windstream could adversely affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT”) and could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
120
Constructive Fraudulent Transfer. Windstream alleges that rent payments and tenant capital improvements made by Windstream under the Master Lease since at least the third quarter of 2017 constitute constructive fraudulent transfers. If the constructive fraudulent transfer claim were successful, Uniti may be required to repay Windstream the amount of rent payments made by Windstream above fair market rent as determined by the Bankruptcy Court and the aggregate amount of all tenant capital improvements made by Windstream, in each case since the date on which the Bankruptcy Court found Windstream to have been insolvent. In its complaint in the adversary proceeding, Windstream alleges that it has paid approximately $
Master Lease for Personal Property. Windstream alleges that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property. If the Master Lease were determined to be a lease of personal property, the deadline for Windstream Holdings to assume or reject the Master Lease would be the confirmation of its plan of reorganization by the Bankruptcy Court, which would extend the deadline that would otherwise be applicable under the bankruptcy code if the Master Lease were treated as a lease of real property, and Windstream could seek from the Bankruptcy Court relief from its current performance obligations during the bankruptcy case. In addition, if the Master Lease were determined to be a lease of personal property, this could also impact our status as a REIT if the Internal Revenue Service were to determine that our gross income is not sufficiently derived from real property. See “Risk Factors— Risks Related to the Status of Uniti as a REIT—Recent developments surrounding Windstream could adversely affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT.” On January 21, 2020, Windstream agreed to stay, without prejudice, its action seeking a determination that the Master Lease is a lease of personal property.
Breach of Contract. Windstream alleges that Uniti has breached its non-competition obligations to Windstream under the Master Lease and that Windstream is entitled to damages and/or an abatement of rent as a result of such breach, although no damages amount has been asserted. We believe this claim is without merit and in any event do not believe damages would be material.
While the Windstream Master Lease litigation is currently stayed, it is difficult to predict what could occur in Windstream’s bankruptcy restructuring. However, any adverse determination or judicial decision on one or more of the claims against us could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition or, in certain circumstances, cause us to file for voluntary Chapter 11 protection. As discussed in Note 22, the Settlement, if effectuated, would result in mutual releases with respect to any and all liability related to any claims and causes of action that currently exist between Uniti and Windstream. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are unable to determine what, if any, portion of the consideration to be paid to Windstream would be classified as settlement of litigation, and therefore, we have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. However, we could incur a loss related to the Settlement in future periods.
In addition, pursuant to the Master Lease, Windstream has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, any use, misuse, maintenance or repair by Windstream with respect to the Distribution Systems. Windstream is currently a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings, including various claims arising in the ordinary course of its telecommunications business, which are subject to the indemnities provided by Windstream to us. If Windstream assumes the Master Lease, it would be obligated to honor all indemnification claims. If Windstream were to reject the Master Lease, any indemnification claims would be treated as unsecured claims, and, if that were to occur, there can be no assurance we would receive any indemnification payments from Windstream. While these actions and proceedings are not believed to be material, individually or in the aggregate, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted. The resolution of any such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on Windstream’s business, financial position or results of operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations if Windstream is unable to meet its indemnification obligations.
On July 3, 2019, SLF Holdings, LLC (“SLF”) filed a complaint against the Company, Uniti Fiber, and certain current and former officers of the Company (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, in connection with Uniti Fiber’s purchase of Southern Light, LLC from SLF in
121
July 2017. The complaint asserted claims for fraud and conspiracy, as well as claims under federal and Alabama securities laws, alleging that Defendants improperly failed to disclose to SLF the risk that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. On September 26, 2019, the action was transferred to United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On November 18, 2019, SLF filed an amended complaint, adding allegations that Defendants also failed to fully disclose the risk that the Master Lease purportedly could be recharacterized as a financing instead of “true lease.” The amended complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as reformation of the purchase agreement for the sale. On December 18, 2019, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety. That motion was fully briefed as of February 7, 2020, but no decision has been issued. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss and therefore have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On October 25, 2019, Ibrahim E. Safadi filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers alleging violations of federal securities laws (the “Safadi Action”). The putative class action seeks to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and February 15, 2019. The lawsuit asserts violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. The lawsuit seeks class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss and therefore have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On December 6, 2019, Phil Queder filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers alleging violations of federal securities laws (the “Queder Action”). The putative class action seeks to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and February 15, 2019. The lawsuit asserts violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream. The lawsuit seeks class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss and therefore have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On December 23, 2019, Michael Avery filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against the Company and certain of our officers alleging violations of federal securities laws. The putative class action seeks to represent investors who acquired the Company’s securities between April 20, 2015 and June 24, 2019 (the “Avery Action”). The lawsuit asserts violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, alleging that the Company made materially false and misleading statements by allegedly failing to disclose that the Spin-Off and entry into the Master Lease violated certain debt covenants of Windstream, which would have certain consequences for the Company’s liquidity. The lawsuit seeks class certification, unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and other relief. We intend to defend this matter vigorously, and, because it is still in its preliminary stages, we have not yet determined what effect this lawsuit will have, if any, on our financial position or results of operations. On March 9, 2020, the plaintiff in the Avery Action filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice. As a result, we have not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On December 30, 2019, various putative shareholders of the Company filed motions to consolidate the Safadi, Queder, and Avery Actions and to appoint a lead plaintiff and lead counsel in the consolidated action. The Court has not yet ruled on those motions.
122
Under the terms of the tax matters agreement entered into on April 24, 2015 by the Company, Windstream Services, LLC and Windstream (the “Tax Matters Agreement”), in connection with the Spin-Off, we are generally responsible for any taxes imposed on Windstream that arise from the failure of the Spin-Off and the debt exchanges to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, within the meaning of Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, as applicable, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to certain actions, events or transactions relating to our stock, indebtedness, assets or business, or a breach of the relevant representations or any covenants made by us in the Tax Matters Agreement, the materials submitted to the IRS in connection with the request for the private letter ruling or the representations provided in connection with the tax opinion. We believe that the probability of us incurring obligations under the Tax Matters Agreement are remote; and therefore, we have recorded
Commitments
Bluebird Lease. Under the terms of the Bluebird Lease (see Note 6), we have the right, but not the obligation, to fund growth capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has committed to fund approximately $
Note 16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Cash flow hedge changes in fair value gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Translation adjustments |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at end of period |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at end of period |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note 17. Income Taxes
We elected on our initial U.S. federal income tax return to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least
123
income at regular corporate income tax rates, and we could not deduct dividends paid to our shareholders in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to shareholders. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from reelecting to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.
Subject to the temporary restriction imposed by the waiver and amendment to our Credit Agreement (see Note 11), our ability to make cash distributions to our shareholders in amounts exceeding
We have elected to treat the subsidiaries through which we operate Uniti Fiber and Talk America, as well as certain portions of Uniti Towers, as TRSs. TRSs enable us to engage in activities that result in income that does not constitute qualifying income for a REIT. Our TRSs are subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes.
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 as reported in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income was comprised of the following:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total current expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
State |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total deferred expense |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
124
An income tax expense reconciliation between the U.S. statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Income from continuing operations, before tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Income tax at U.S. statutory federal rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Increases (decreases) resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Benefit of REIT status |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capitalized transaction costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Adjustment of deferred tax balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Permanent differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Rate differential |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations differs from tax at the statutory rate primarily due to our status as a REIT and certain unrecognized tax benefits related to foreign taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
(Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued bonuses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess business interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Lease asset liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
Customer list intangible |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other intangible amortization |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Right of use asset |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred or prepaid costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Debt discount and interest expense |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
125
As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s deferred tax assets were primarily the result of U.S. federal and state NOL carryforwards.
As of each reporting date, the Company’s management considers new evidence, both positive and negative, that could impact management’s view with regard to future realization of deferred tax assets. Given the Company has significant deferred tax liabilities which are not limited by Sec. 269(a)(1) of the Code, management determined that sufficient positive evidence exists as of December 31, 2019, to conclude that it is more likely than not that all of its deferred tax assets are realizable, and therefore,
On
We have total federal NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 2019 of approximately $
With the exception of Tower Cloud, Inc. and Uniti Fiber Holdings Inc., our
The Company or its subsidiaries file tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and local jurisdictions, and certain foreign jurisdictions.
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions related to acquisitions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Additions for tax positions for the current year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Settlements |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Company’s entire liability for unrecognized tax benefit would affect the annual effective tax rate if recognized.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as additional tax expense. The Company recorded $
Note 18. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest expense and income taxes is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Cash payments for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of capitalized interest) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
126
Note 19. Capital Stock
On July 2, 2019, the Company issued
Until June 15, 2019, we had an effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC (the “Registration Statement”) to offer and sell various securities from time to time. Under the Registration Statement, we established an at-the-market common stock offering program (the “ATM Program”) to sell shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $
On April 25, 2017, we issued
We are authorized to issue up to
Note 20. Dividends (Distributions)
Distributions with respect to our common stock is characterized for federal income tax purposes as taxable ordinary dividends, capital gains dividends, non-dividend distribution or a combination thereof.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2019 (1) |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Ordinary dividends |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-dividend distributions |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
|
Note 21. Employee Benefit Plan
We sponsor a defined contribution plan under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which covers employees who are 21 years of age and over. Under this plan,
We sponsor a deferred compensation plan. The plan is established and maintained by the Company primarily to permit certain management or highly compensated employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, within the meaning of Section 301(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), to
127
defer a percentage of their compensation. The plan is an unfunded deferred compensation plan intended to qualify for the exemptions provided in, and shall be administered in a manner consistent with Section 201, 301 and 401 of ERISA and Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Note 22. Subsequent Events
On March 2, 2020, Uniti and Windstream jointly announced that they have reached an agreement in principle (the “Settlement”) to resolve any and all claims and causes of action that have been or may be asserted against Uniti by Windstream, including all litigation brought by Windstream and certain of its creditors in the context of Windstream’s bankruptcy. All litigation between Windstream and Uniti will be stayed while the parties negotiate and prepare the definitive documentation to implement the Settlement.
Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti and Windstream will agree to mutual releases with respect to any and all liability related to any claims and causes of action between them, including those relating to Windstream’s Chapter 11 proceedings and the Master Lease. Under the Settlement, Uniti will agree to make a $
Windstream and Uniti will also agree to bifurcate the Master Lease into two structurally similar, but independent, agreements to govern the ILEC and CLEC facilities, respectively (collectively, the “New Leases”). Certain copper CLEC assets will be governed under the New Lease relating to the ILEC facilities. The initial aggregate annual rent under the New Leases will be equal to the annual rent under the Master Lease currently in effect. Each of Windstream Services, LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and/or newly formed affiliated entities will become parties to the New Leases. The New Leases will contain cross-guarantees and cross-default provision, which will remain effective as long as Windstream or an affiliate is a tenant under one of the New Leases. In addition, the New Leases will be amended to require that Windstream maintain certain financial covenants and to permit Uniti to transfer its rights and obligations and otherwise monetize or encumber the New Leases so long as it does not transfer interests to a Windstream competitor.
Pursuant to the Settlement, Uniti will agree to fund up to an aggregate $
Pursuant to the Settlement, if Windstream is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Leases, Uniti will not be required to fund Growth Capital Improvements. In the event Uniti defaults or otherwise fails to timely satisfy its obligations under the New Leases and Windstream is in compliance with the terms of the New
128
Leases, then Windstream has the right to deduct from the subsequent rent payment or payments, amounts otherwise owed to Windstream.
In connection with the Settlement, Uniti also entered into binding letters of intent on March 2, 2020 (each, a “Letter of Intent”) with certain first lien creditors of Windstream, pursuant to which Uniti will sell an aggregate of
Finally, on March 2, 2020, Uniti, Windstream and certain of Windstream’s creditors (collectively with Uniti and Windstream, the “Parties”) entered into a Plan Support Agreement (the “Plan Support Agreement”). Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, the Parties agreed to support the Settlement and the approval of a plan of reorganization for Windstream (the “Plan”) on the terms and subject to the conditions described therein. The Plan Support Agreement is terminable by the Parties upon the occurrence of certain specified termination events, including, among other things, (i) the failure to meet certain case milestones, including failure by Windstream to file a motion to approve the Settlement by March 12, 2020 and failure to obtain approval of the Settlement from the bankruptcy court by April 6, 2020, (ii) failure by Windstream to timely appeal any order by the bankruptcy court denying the Settlement or any order overturning an order approving the Settlement on appeal, and (iii) the issuance by a regulatory authority of an order enjoining, or the commencement of an action that could be reasonably expected to enjoin, material portions of the settlement or substantial consummation of the Settlement (subject to a 10 day cure period). The parties to the Plan Support Agreement expect the Plan to become effective, and for Windstream to emerge from bankruptcy, by August 29, 2020.
The Settlement is subject to negotiation and execution of definitive documentation and certain regulatory approvals and conditions precedent, including bankruptcy court approval and Uniti’s receipt of satisfactory “true lease” opinions confirming that the New Leases are “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In February 2020, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell
The definitive agreement includes a "go-shop" provision, which permits Uniti's Board of Directors and its advisors to solicit alternative proposals from third parties. Uniti will have the right to terminate the agreement to enter into a superior proposal subject to certain terms and conditions.
On February 10, 2020, the Operating Partnership, CSL Capital, LLC, Uniti Group Finance 2019 Inc. and Uniti Fiber, as co-issuers, issued $
On February 10, 2020, we received a limited waiver from our lenders under our Credit Agreement, waiving an event of default related solely to the receipt of a going concern opinion from our auditors for our 2019 audited financial statements. The limited waiver was issued in connection with the Sixth Amendment to our Credit Agreement. In addition to the restrictions imposed by the Fourth Amendment discussed above, which remain effective, the Sixth Amendment also limits the ability of our non-guarantor subsidiaries to incur indebtedness. The Sixth Amendment increased the interest rate on our revolving facility by
129
ranging from
Note 23. Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)
Selected quarterly information for each of the four quarters in the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
2019 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
||||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Selected quarterly information for each of the four quarters in the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
|
2018 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
||||
(Thousands, except per share data) |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
130
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019, due to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:
|
• |
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and |
|
• |
|
• |
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013).
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 due to the following material weakness. We did not design or maintain effective controls over the identification and valuation of certain assets in the application of the acquisition method
131
of accounting for asset acquisitions, including the determination of appropriate useful lives for certain assets. Specifically, our controls over the development and application of inputs, assumptions and calculations used in fair value measurements were not designed and operating effectively at an appropriate level of precision. This material weakness resulted in immaterial errors to property, plant and equipment and gross intangible assets on the consolidated balance sheets and amortization on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended September 30, 2019, which were corrected in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. While these errors were determined not to be material to the consolidated financial statements, this material weakness could result in misstatements of the aforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has also audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as stated in their report which appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Remediation Plan
Management has taken remedial action to ensure that the deficiency contributing to the material weakness is remediated such that the existing control will operate effectively. The remediation actions we are taking, and expect to take, include: (i) improving the design and operation of control activities and procedures associated with the identification and valuation of assets acquired in asset acquisitions; and (ii) educating and re-training control owners regarding internal control processes to mitigate identified risks and maintaining adequate documentation to evidence the effective design and operation of such processes.
We believe that these actions, and the improvements we expect to achieve as a result, will effectively remediate the material weakness. However, the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting will not be considered remediated until the remediated controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are designed and operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of this material weakness will be completed in fiscal 2020.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
132
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Except as set forth below, the information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act in connection with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
We have a code of ethics as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K, which code applies to all of our directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics, titled “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics & Whistleblower Policy,” is available free of charge in the Corporate Governance section of the About Us page on our website at www.uniti.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, any provision of our code of ethics by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act in connection with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Except as set forth below, the information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act in connection with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table contains information about our equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2019:
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
|||||
Plan category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
||
|
(a) |
(b)
|
(c)
|
||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
- |
- |
5,882,4471
|
||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
- |
- |
- |
||
Total |
- |
- |
5,882,447
|
||
|
|
||||
1 |
Amount includes 3,965,734 shares available for issuance under the Uniti Group Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and 1,916,713 shares under the Uniti Group Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
133
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act in connection with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act in connection with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
134
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statements
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Financial Statement Schedules
Uniti Group Inc. Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant (Parent Company) Condensed Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income and Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes, appearing on pages S-1, S-2, S-3, and S-4 of this report.
Uniti Group Inc. Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 appearing on page S-5 of this report.
Uniti Group Inc. Schedule III – Schedule of Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2019 appearing on page S-6 of this report.
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
2.1 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
2.3** |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
135
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
136
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
4.9 |
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
4.19 |
|
137
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
4.20 |
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
4.22* |
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
138
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.8 |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
10.16 |
|
139
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.17+ |
|
|
10.18+ |
|
|
10.19+ |
|
|
10.20+ |
|
|
10.21+ |
|
|
10.22+ |
|
|
10.23+ |
|
|
10.24+ |
|
|
10.25+ |
|
|
10.26+ |
|
|
10.27+ |
|
|
10.28+ |
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
10.30 |
|
140
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.31 |
|
|
10.32+*** |
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
21.1* |
|
|
23.1* |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm |
31.1* |
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
|
32.2* |
|
|
101.INS |
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
101.SCH |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
104 |
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
* |
Filed herewith |
** |
Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment granted by, and have been filed separately with, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also, certain exhibits and schedules to this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish a supplemental copy of any such omitted exhibit or schedule to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request but may request confidential treatment for any exhibit or schedule so furnished. |
141
*** |
Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K because such portions are both not material and would likely cause competitive harm to the Company if publicly disclosed. The Company agrees to furnish an unredacted copy of the exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request but may request confidential treatment for any supplemental material so furnished. |
+ |
Constitutes a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement. |
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
142
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
UNITI GROUP INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 12, 2020 |
|
By: |
/s/ Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Wallace |
|
Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Mark A. Wallace |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Blake Schuhmacher |
|
Senior Vice President – Chief Accounting Officer |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Blake Schuhmacher |
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis X. Frantz |
|
Chairman and Director |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Francis X. Frantz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jennifer S. Banner |
|
Director |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Jennifer S. Banner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott G. Bruce |
|
Director |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Scott G. Bruce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Carmen Perez-Carlton |
|
Director |
|
March 12, 2020 |
Carmen Perez-Carlton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David L. Solomon |
|
Director |
|
March 12, 2020 |
David L. Solomon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of
The Registrant (Parent Company)
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Thousands, except par value) |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions and losses in excess of investments in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, $ |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total Uniti shareholders' deficit |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock, and Shareholders' Deficit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Uniti Group Inc. included in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
S-1
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of
The Registrant (Parent Company)
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to shareholders |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Uniti Group Inc. included in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
S-2
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of
The Registrant (Parent Company)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payment on debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under revolving credit facility |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Payments of contingent consideration |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Payments for financing costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock issuance, net of costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net share settlement |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from sale of warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Payment for bond hedge option |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Intercompany transactions, net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of convertible preferred stock, Series A Shares |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Settlement of contingent consideration through non-cash consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Uniti Group Inc. included in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
S-3
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of
The Registrant (Parent Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
Note 1. Background and Basis of Presentation
Uniti Group Inc.’s parent company financial information has been derived from its consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes of Uniti and its subsidiaries included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 2. Subsidiary Transactions
Investment in Subsidiaries
During 2017, the parent company completed its reorganization (the “up-REIT Reorganization”) to operate through a customary “up-REIT” structure, pursuant to which we hold substantially all of our assets through a partnership, Uniti Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), that we control as general partner, with the only significant difference between the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries compared to the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations of Uniti is that the results for the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries do not include Uniti’s Consumer CLEC segment, which consists of Talk America Services. The up-REIT structure is intended to facilitate future acquisition opportunities by providing the Company with the ability to use common units of the Operating Partnership as a tax-efficient acquisition currency. As of December 31, 2019, we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and own approximately
Dividends
Cash dividends received from subsidiaries and recorded in Cash Flow from Operating Activities in the Condensed Statement of Cash Flows were $
S-4
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(dollars in thousands)
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
|
Column C |
|
|
Column D |
|
|
Column E |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Description |
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
Charged to Cost and Expenses |
|
|
Charged to Other Accounts |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
S-5
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule III – Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation
As of December 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands)
Col. A |
|
Col. B |
|
|
Col. C |
|
Col. D |
|
Col. E |
|
|
Col. F |
|
|
Col. G |
|
Col. H |
|
Col. I |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition(1) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life on which Depreciation in Latest Income |
||
Description |
|
Encumbrances |
|
|
Initial cost to company(1) |
|
Improvements |
|
Carry Costs |
|
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period(5) |
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
Date of Construction(2) |
|
Date Acquired(2) |
|
Statements is Computed |
|||
Land |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
Indefinite |
Building and improvements |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Poles |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Fiber |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Copper |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Conduit |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Towers |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Finance lease assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 |
Real property interest |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 |
Other assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3 |
(1) Given the voluminous nature and variety of our real estate investment assets, this schedule omits columns C and D from the schedule III presentation.
(2) Because additions and improvements to our real estate investment assets are ongoing, construction and acquisition dates are not applicable.
(3) For the year ended December 31, 2019, the amount of capitalized costs related to the Distribution Systems is as follows (millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant capital improvements(4) |
|
$ |
|
|
(4) Tenant capital improvements represent, maintenance, repair, overbuild, upgrade or replacements to the leased network, including, without limitation, the replacement of copper distribution systems with fiber distribution systems. We receive non-monetary consideration related to the TCIs as they automatically become our property, and we recognize the cost basis of TCIs that are capital in nature.
S-6
(5) Aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes related to our real estate investment assets is $
Uniti Group Inc.
Schedule III – Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation
As of December 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||
Gross amount at beginning |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant capital improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sold or disposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||
Gross amount of accumulated depreciation at beginning |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Total additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of accumulated depreciation for assets sold or disposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
S-7
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
The following is a brief description of the common stock of Uniti Group Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), the only class of the Company’s securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). This description of the terms of our common stock does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) and our charter and bylaws. See “Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws,” below.
Description of Common Stock
General
Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share. Our charter authorizes our board of directors, with the approval of a majority of the entire board of directors and without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we are authorized to issue.
Under Maryland law, a stockholder generally is not liable for a corporation’s debts or obligations solely as a result of the stockholder’s status as a stockholder.
Terms
Subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of our stock and the provisions of our charter that restrict transfer and ownership of our stock discussed in the “Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer” section below, the holders of shares of our common stock are generally entitled to receive dividends on such stock out of assets legally available for distribution to the stockholders when, as and if authorized by our board of directors and declared by us. The holders of shares of our common stock will also be entitled to share ratably in our net assets legally available for distribution to stockholders in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after payment of or adequate provision for all known debts and liabilities.
Subject to the rights of any other class or series of our stock and the provisions of our charter that restrict transfer and ownership of our stock discussed in the “Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer” section below, each outstanding share of our common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors. Under our charter, there is no cumulative voting in the election of directors. Our bylaws require that each director be elected by a plurality of votes cast with respect to such director, except in the case of an uncontested election, in which case our bylaws require that each director be elected by a majority of votes cast with respect to such director.
Holders of shares of our common stock generally have no preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund, redemption or appraisal rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our securities. All outstanding shares of our common stock are fully paid and non-assessable. Subject to the provisions of our charter that restrict transfer and ownership of our stock, all shares of our common stock will have equal dividend, liquidation and other rights.
1
Power to Increase or Decrease Authorized Shares of Common Stock and Issue Additional Shares of Common Stock
Our charter authorizes our board of directors, with the approval of a majority of the entire board of directors and without stockholder approval, to amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of common stock or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have the authority to issue.
We believe that the power of our board of directors to amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of common stock and to authorize us to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of our common stock provides us with increased flexibility in structuring possible future financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs that might arise. The additional classes or series, as well as the additional authorized shares of our common stock, will be available for issuance without further action by our stockholders, unless such action is required by applicable law, the terms of any class or series of preferred stock that we may issue in the future or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed or traded. Our board of directors could authorize us to issue a class or series of stock that could, depending upon the terms of the particular class or series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control of the Company that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or that our common stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The registrar and transfer agent for our common stock is EQ Shareowner Services.
Listing
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “UNIT.”
Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer
In order for us to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), our stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months (other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been made) or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Also, not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, beneficially or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities such as qualified pension plans) during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been made). In addition, rent from related-party tenants (generally, a tenant of a REIT owned, beneficially or constructively, 10% or more by the REIT, or a 10% owner of the REIT) is not qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests under the Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy other requirements as well.
Our charter contains restrictions on the transfer and ownership of our stock. The relevant sections of our charter provide that, subject to the exceptions described below, no person or entity may beneficially own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the applicable constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock or more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock. These limits are collectively referred to herein as the “ownership limits.” The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause stock owned beneficially or constructively by a group of related individuals or entities to be owned constructively by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of our outstanding common stock or less than 9.8% of our outstanding capital stock, or the acquisition of an interest in an entity that beneficially or constructively owns our stock, could, nevertheless, cause the acquiror, or another individual or entity, to own constructively shares of our outstanding stock in excess of the ownership limits.
Upon receipt of certain representations and agreements and in its sole and absolute discretion, our board of directors is able to, prospectively or retroactively, exempt a person from the ownership limits or establish a different limit on ownership, or an excepted holder limit, for a particular stockholder if the stockholder’s ownership in excess of the ownership limits would not result in us being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT. As a condition of granting a waiver of the ownership limits or creating an excepted holder limit, our board of directors will be able to, but is not required to, require an IRS ruling or opinion of counsel
2
satisfactory to our board of directors (in its sole discretion) as it may deem necessary or advisable to determine or ensure our status as a REIT.
Our board of directors is also able to, from time to time, increase or decrease the ownership limits unless, after giving effect to the increased or decreased ownership limits, five or fewer persons could beneficially own or constructively own, in the aggregate, more than 49.9% in value of our outstanding stock or we would otherwise fail to qualify as a REIT. Decreased ownership limits will not apply to any person or entity whose ownership of our stock is in excess of the decreased ownership limits until the person or entity’s ownership of our stock equals or falls below the decreased ownership limits, but any further acquisition of our stock will be in violation of the decreased ownership limits.
Our charter also prohibits:
|
• |
any person from beneficially or constructively owning shares of our stock to the extent such beneficial or constructive ownership would result in us being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT; |
|
• |
any person from transferring shares of our stock if the transfer would result in shares of our stock being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons; |
|
• |
any person from beneficially owning shares of our stock to the extent such ownership would result in our failing to qualify as a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity,” within the meaning of Section 897(h) of the Code; |
|
• |
any person from beneficially or constructively owning shares of our stock to the extent such beneficial or constructive ownership would cause us to own, beneficially or constructively, more than a 9.9% interest (as set forth in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code) in a tenant of our real property; and |
|
• |
any person from constructively owning shares of our stock to the extent such constructive ownership would cause any “eligible independent contractor” that operates a “qualified health care property” on behalf of a “taxable REIT subsidiary” (a “TRS”) of ours (as such terms are defined in Sections 856(d)(9)(A), 856(e)(6)(D)(i) and 856(l) of the Code, respectively) to fail to qualify as such. |
Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire beneficial or constructive ownership of shares of our stock that will or may violate the ownership limits, or any of the other restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock, and any person who is the intended transferee of shares of our stock that are transferred to the charitable trust described below, will be required to give immediate written notice and, in the case of a proposed transaction, at least 15 days prior written notice, to us and provide us with such other information as we may request in order to determine the effect of the transfer on our status as a REIT. The provisions of our charter regarding restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT.
Any attempted transfer of our stock which, if effective, would result in our stock being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons will be null and void and the proposed transferee will acquire no rights in such shares of our stock. Any attempted transfer of our stock which, if effective, would violate any of the other restrictions described above will cause the number of shares causing the violation (rounded up to the nearest whole share) to be automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more charitable beneficiaries, and the proposed transferee will not acquire any rights in the shares. The trustee of the trust will be appointed by us and will be unaffiliated with us and any proposed transferee of the shares. The automatic transfer will be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the violative transfer or other event that results in a transfer to the trust. If the transfer to the trust as described above is not automatically effective, for any reason, to prevent violation of the applicable restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock, then the transfer of the shares will be null and void and the proposed transferee will acquire no rights in such shares.
Shares of our stock held in trust will be issued and outstanding shares. The proposed transferee will not benefit economically from ownership of any shares of our stock held in the trust, will have no rights to dividends and no rights to vote or other rights attributable to the shares of stock held in the trust. The trustee of the trust will exercise
3
all voting rights and receive all dividends and other distributions with respect to shares held in the trust for the exclusive benefit of the charitable beneficiary of the trust. Any dividend or other distribution paid prior to our discovery that shares have been transferred to a trust as described above must be repaid by the recipient to the trustee upon demand. Subject to Maryland law, effective as of the date that the shares have been transferred to the trust, the trustee will have the authority, at the trustee’s sole discretion, to rescind as void any vote cast by a proposed transferee prior to our discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and to recast the vote in accordance with the desires of the trustee acting for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary of the trust. However, if we have already taken irreversible corporate action, then the trustee may not rescind and recast the vote.
If our board of directors or a committee thereof determines in good faith that a proposed transfer or other event has taken place that violates the restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock set forth in our charter, our board of directors or such committee may take such action as it deems advisable to refuse to give effect to or to prevent such transfer, including, but not limited to, causing us to redeem shares of stock, refusing to give effect to the transfer on our books or instituting proceedings to enjoin the transfer; provided that any transfer or other event in violation of the above restrictions shall automatically result in the transfer to the trust described above, and, where applicable, such transfer or other event shall be null and void as provided above irrespective of any action or non-action by our board of directors or any committee or designee thereof.
Shares of stock transferred to the trustee will be deemed offered for sale to us, or our designee, at a price per share equal to the lesser of (1) the price paid per share in the transaction that resulted in such transfer to the charitable trust (or, in the case of a devise or gift, the market price of such stock at the time of such devise or gift) and (2) the market price of such stock on the date we, or our designee, accept such offer. We may reduce the amount so payable to the trustee by the amount of any dividend or other distribution that we made to the proposed transferee before we discovered that the shares had been automatically transferred to the trust and that are then owed by the proposed transferee to the trustee as described above, and we may pay the amount of any such reduction to the trustee for distribution to the charitable beneficiary. We will have the right to accept such offer until the trustee has sold the shares held in the charitable trust, as discussed below. Upon a sale to us, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will be required to distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the proposed transferee, and any distributions held by the trustee with respect to such shares to the charitable beneficiary.
If we do not buy the shares, the trustee will be required, within 20 days of receiving notice from us of a transfer of shares to the trust, to sell the shares to a person or entity designated by the trustee who could own the shares without violating the ownership limits, or the other restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock. After selling the shares, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares transferred to the trust will terminate and the trustee will be required to distribute to the proposed transferee an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the price paid by the proposed transferee for the shares or, if the proposed transferee did not give value for the shares in connection with the event causing the shares to be held by the trust (e.g., in the case of a gift, devise or other such transaction), the market price of such stock on the day of the event causing the shares to be held by the trust and (2) the sales proceeds (net of any commissions and other expenses of sale) received by the trustee from the sale or other disposition of the shares. The trustee may reduce the amount payable to the proposed transferee by the amount of any dividends or other distributions that we paid to the proposed transferee before we discovered that the shares had been automatically transferred to the trust and that are then owed by the proposed transferee to the trustee as described above. Any net sales proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the proposed transferee will be paid immediately to the charitable beneficiary, together with any distributions thereon. If the proposed transferee sells such shares prior to the discovery that such shares have been transferred to the trustee, then (a) such shares shall be deemed to have been sold on behalf of the trust and (b) to the extent that the proposed transferee received an amount for such shares that exceeds the amount that such proposed transferee would have received if such shares had been sold by the trustee, such excess shall be paid to the trustee upon demand. The proposed transferee will have no rights in the shares held by the trustee.
Any certificates representing shares of our stock will bear a legend referring to the restrictions on transfer and ownership described above.
Every owner of 5% or more (or such lower percentage as required by the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder) of our stock, within 30 days after the end of each taxable year, will be required to give us written notice stating the person’s name and address, the number of shares of each class and series of our stock that the person
4
beneficially owns, a description of the manner in which the shares are held and any additional information that we request in order to determine the effect, if any, of the person’s beneficial ownership on our status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the ownership limits. In addition, any beneficial owner or constructive owner of shares of our stock and any person or entity (including the stockholder of record) who holds shares of our stock for a beneficial owner or constructive owner will be required to, on request, disclose to us in writing such information as we may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of the stockholder’s beneficial and constructive ownership of our stock on our status as a REIT and to comply, or determine our compliance with, the requirements of any governmental or taxing authority.
The restrictions on transfer and ownership described above could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control in which holders of shares of our stock might receive a premium for their shares over the then prevailing price.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND OF OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS
The following summary of certain provisions of Maryland law and of our charter and bylaws does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our charter and bylaws, copies of which are filed with, or incorporated by reference, as exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this description is attached, and to the MGCL.
Amendments to Our Charter and Bylaws and Approval of Extraordinary Actions
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot amend its charter, merge, consolidate, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a statutory share exchange or dissolve unless the action is advised by the board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its charter for approval of these actions by a lesser percentage, but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of our outstanding stock is required to approve all charter amendments or extraordinary actions. However, Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to transfer all or substantially all of its assets without the approval of the stockholders of the corporation to one or more persons if all of the equity interests of the person or persons are owned, directly or indirectly, by the corporation.
Our charter also requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of our outstanding stock to amend the provisions of the charter relating to the restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock, amendment of our bylaws, limitation of liability and indemnification of directors and officers, stockholder action and the inability of stockholders to act by written consent, and the amendment of the provision of our charter regarding amendments.
Our board of directors has the authority, without any action by our stockholders, to amend the Company’s charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that the Company has authority to issue.
Any and all provisions of the bylaws may be repealed, altered, amended, or rescinded and new bylaws may be adopted (a) by the stockholders at any annual meeting of the stockholders or at any special meeting called for that purpose (provided that notice of such proposal is included in the notice of such meeting) and (b) by the board of directors at any regular or special meeting of the board of directors; provided, however, the board of directors does not have the power to alter or repeal any bylaw made by the stockholders.
Business Combinations
The Company has elected not to be governed by the Maryland Business Combination Act. If it were not for this election (which is stated in our charter and can be amended only with the approval of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of our outstanding stock), under the MGCL, certain “business combinations” between us and any interested stockholder or affiliate of an interested stockholder would be prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business
5
combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
|
• |
any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or |
|
• |
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation. |
A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which such person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, a board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board of directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
|
• |
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and |
|
• |
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder, voting together as a single class. |
These supermajority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under the MGCL, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. In light of the election in our charter, however, the five-year prohibition and the supermajority vote requirements will not apply to business combinations between us and any interested stockholder of ours.
Control Share Acquisitions
The Company has exempted all of its shares from the application of the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. If it were not for this exemption, Maryland law would provide that issued and outstanding shares of our stock acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or by employees who are directors of the corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to, directly or indirectly, exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
|
• |
one-tenth or more but less than one-third; |
|
• |
one-third or more but less than a majority; or |
|
• |
more than 50%. |
Control shares do not include shares the acquiror is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition may compel the board of directors of the corporation to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting
6
rights of the shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including an undertaking to pay the expenses of the special meeting. If no request for a special meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholder meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the special meeting or if the acquiror does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then the corporation may, subject to certain conditions and limitations, redeem for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. Fair value is determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholder meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The control share acquisition statute does not apply (1) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction, or (2) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Our charter contains a provision that exempts from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of any shares of our stock. This charter provision can be amended only with the approval of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of our outstanding stock.
Subtitle 8
The Company is prohibited by its charter from electing to be subject to the “unsolicited takeover” provisions of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL, which permit a Maryland corporation with a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors to elect to be subject, by provision in its charter or bylaws or by a resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to any or all of five provisions:
|
• |
a classified board; |
|
• |
a two-thirds vote requirement for removing a director; |
|
• |
a requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by vote of the directors; |
|
• |
a requirement that a vacancy on the board be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office and such director shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualified; and |
|
• |
a majority requirement for the calling of a special meeting of stockholders. |
This prohibition may be rescinded or amended only with the approval of at least a majority in voting power of our outstanding stock.
Special Meetings of the Stockholders; Stockholder Action by Written Consent
Our charter provides that special meetings of the stockholders may be called at any time by our board of directors or upon the written request of the holders of not less than 20% in voting power of our outstanding stock. Our charter prohibits stockholders from taking any action by written consent in lieu of a meeting for so long as any security of the Company is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
Transactions Outside the Ordinary Course of Business
Under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation generally may not dissolve, merge or consolidate with another entity, sell all or substantially all of its assets or engage in a statutory share exchange unless the action is declared advisable by the board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of
7
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, unless a lesser percentage (but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter) is specified in the corporation’s charter. Our charter provides that these actions must be approved by a majority in voting power of our outstanding stock.
Advance Notice of Director Nomination and New Business
Our bylaws provide that, at any annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to the board of directors and proposals of business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by or at the direction of the board of directors or (3) by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record at the time of provision of notice and at the time of the meeting, is entitled to vote at the meeting in the election of directors or on such other proposed business and who has complied with the advance notice procedures of our bylaws. The stockholder generally must provide notice to the secretary not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of preceding year’s annual meeting. Only the business specified in our notice of meeting may be brought before any special meeting of stockholders.
Our bylaws provide that nominations of individuals for election to our board of directors at a meeting of stockholders may be made only (1) by or at the direction of the board of directors or (2) by any stockholder of record at the time of provision of the notice and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting in the election of each individual so nominated and who has complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in our bylaws. Such stockholder will be entitled to nominate one or more individuals, as the case may be, for election as a director if the stockholder’s notice, containing the information required by our bylaws, is delivered to the secretary (i) in the case of an annual meeting, not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary of our preceding year’s annual meeting; provided that if the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from such anniversary date, notice must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made, or (ii) in the case of a special meeting, not earlier than 120 days prior to such special meeting and not later than the later of 90 days prior to such special meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the board of directors to be elected at such meeting.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give advance notice of nominations and other proposals is to afford our board of directors the opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees or the advisability of the other proposals and, to the extent considered necessary by our board of directors, to inform stockholders and make recommendations regarding the nominations or other proposals. The advance notice procedures will also permit a more orderly procedure for conducting stockholder meetings.
Effect of Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws
The restrictions on transfer and ownership of our stock will prohibit any person from acquiring more than 9.8% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock or more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock, without the prior consent of our board of directors. Because our board of directors will be able to approve exceptions to the ownership limits, the ownership limits will not interfere with a merger or other business combination approved by our board of directors.
The provisions described above, along with other provisions of the MGCL and our charter and bylaws discussed above, including provisions relating to the removal of directors and the filling of vacancies, the advance notice provisions and the procedures that stockholders will be required to follow to request a special meeting, alone or in combination, could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or other change in control of us that might involve a premium price for shares of our common stockholders or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders, and could increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Exclusive Forum
Our bylaws designate the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (and, in some circumstances, other federal and state courts in Maryland) as the exclusive forum for resolving:
|
• |
any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company; |
8
|
• |
any action asserting a claim for breach of fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of the Company to the Company or its stockholders; |
|
• |
any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of the Company arising out of or relating to any provision of the MGCL, our charter or our bylaws; or |
|
• |
any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Maryland. |
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision that limits the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from (1) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (2) active or deliberate dishonesty that is established by a final judgment and that is material to the cause of action. Our charter contains a provision that limits, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for money damages.
Maryland law requires a Maryland corporation (unless otherwise provided in its charter, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made or threatened to be made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation (which our charter provides for, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law) to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or threatened to be made a party by reason of their service in that capacity unless it is established that:
|
• |
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; |
|
• |
the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or |
|
• |
in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. |
Under the MGCL, we may not indemnify a director or officer in a suit by us or in our right in which the director or officer was adjudged liable to us or in a suit in which the director or officer was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. A court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. However, indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by the corporation or in its right, or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, will be limited to expenses.
In addition, Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation (which our charter provides for, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law) to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon receipt of (1) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification and (2) a written undertaking by him or her, or on his or her behalf, to repay the amount paid or reimbursed if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our charter requires, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, that we indemnify and pay or reimburse the reasonable expenses in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding of (1) any present or former director or officer who is a party to a proceeding (or threatened to be made a party) by reason of his or her service in that capacity, and (2) any individual who, while a director or officer and, at our request, serves or has served as a director, officer, partner, member, manager or trustee of another corporation, REIT, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise from and against any claim or liability to which he or she may become subject or which he or she may incur by reason of his or her service in any of the foregoing capacities.
9
In respect to our obligations to provide indemnification to directors and officers for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and it is therefore unenforceable.
We have entered into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors and executive officers that provide for indemnification of, and advancement of expenses to, each such person in connection with claims, suits or proceedings arising as a result of such person’s service as an officer or director of ours. We also maintain insurance on behalf of our directors and officers, insuring them against liabilities that they may incur in such capacities or arising from this status.
10
Exhibit 21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrants
Subsidiary |
|
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization |
ANS Connect LLC |
|
Georgia |
CSL Capital, LLC |
|
Delaware |
Contact Network, LLC |
|
Alabama |
CSL Alabama System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Arkansas System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Florida System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Georgia Realty, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Georgia System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Iowa System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Kentucky System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Mississippi System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Missouri System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL National, LP |
|
Delaware |
CSL National GP, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL New Mexico System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL North Carolina Realty, LP |
|
Delaware |
CSL North Carolina Realty GP, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL North Carolina System, LP |
|
Delaware |
CSL Ohio System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Oklahoma System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Realty, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Tennessee Realty, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Tennessee Realty Partner, LLC |
|
Delaware |
CSL Texas System, LLC |
|
Delaware |
Hunt Brothers of Louisiana, L.L.C. |
|
Louisiana |
Hunt Telecommunications, LLC |
|
Louisiana |
Information Transport Solutions, Inc. |
|
Alabama |
InLine Services, LLC |
|
Delaware |
Integrated Data Systems, L.L.C. |
|
Louisiana |
Nexus Systems, Inc. |
|
Louisiana |
Nexus Wireless, L.L.C. |
|
Louisiana |
PEG Bandwidth DC, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth DE, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth LA, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth MA, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth MD, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth MS, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth NJ, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth NY Telephone Corp. |
|
New York |
PEG Bandwidth PA, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth Services, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth TX, LLC |
|
Delaware |
PEG Bandwidth VA, LLC |
|
Delaware |
Southern Light, LLC |
|
Alabama |
Talk America Services, LLC* |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Completed Towers LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Dark Fiber LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Fiber Holdings Inc. |
|
Delaware |
|
Delaware |
|
Uniti Group Finance Inc. |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Group Finance 2019 Inc. |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Group LP* |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Group LP LLC* |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Holdings GP LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Holdings LP |
|
Delaware |
Uniti LATAM GP LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti LATAM LP |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Leasing MW LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Leasing LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Leasing X LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Leasing XI LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Leasing XII LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti QRS Holdings GP LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti QRS Holdings LP |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Towers LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Towers NMS Holdings LLC |
|
Delaware |
Uniti Wireless Holdings LLC |
|
Delaware |
____________________________
*Uniti Group LP LLC and Talk America Services, LLC are direct, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Uniti Group Inc. Uniti Group LP is a direct, majority-owned subsidiary of Uniti Group Inc. The remaining subsidiaries are direct or indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Uniti Group LP.
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S‑8 (No. 333-203591 and No. 333-225501) of Uniti Group Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2020 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Little Rock, Arkansas
March 12, 2020
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Kenneth A. Gunderman, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uniti Group Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant, as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
(b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
(c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
(d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
(a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
(b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 12, 2020 |
|
By: |
/s/ Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark A. Wallace, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uniti Group Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant, as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
(b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
(c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
(d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
(a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
(b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 12, 2020 |
|
By: |
/s/ Mark A. Wallace |
|
|
|
Mark A. Wallace |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uniti Group Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Date: March 12, 2020 |
|
By: |
/s/ Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Gunderman |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uniti Group Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Date: March 12, 2020 |
|
By: |
/s/ Mark A. Wallace |
|
|
|
Mark A. Wallace |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |